2013’s ‘Movie 43’ is Gerard Butler’s Worst Movie but Is Not As Bad as Its Reviews Suggest

by

In 2013, Gerard Butler was part of a star-studded lineup for an unusual comedy titled “Movie 43.” With 13 directors, 19 writers, and no discernible plot, this film proved to be a peculiar creation indeed. Despite its intriguing title, “Movie 43” has been universally panned by critics and audiences alike. Known for its raunchy, aimless, and absurd nature, “Movie 43” is an acquired taste that few seem to have developed a liking for. Critics and viewers alike have expressed their disdain for the film. Despite its many flaws, the execution alone warrants more than the abysmal 5% critical rating it currently holds on Rotten Tomatoes.

Movie 43” is a collection of different, unconnected comedic sketches. The connection between them is that they are presented as inventions of a producer (Dennis Quaid), who tries to convince a studio executive about his idea for a new movie starring some of Hollywood’s top actors. A comedy that is both humorous and vulgar, “Movie 43” never strives to surpass its own low standards. Essentially, it’s a whimsical and nonsensical production intended for those who enjoy the humor found in films like “The Three Stooges” and “Shallow Hal“.

A Movie Crafted for Offense… And It Succeeds

The movie titled “Movie 43” seems to be tailored for individuals who appreciate a quick chuckle (people under the influence, teenage boys, or viewers who are multitasking). Produced by the mind behind “It’s Pat” and “Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd“, this movie is characterized by its silliness, lack of intelligence, and reliance on lowbrow humor. However, it’s worth noting that some jokes fall flat, and there are a surprising number of scenes that might make you cringe with secondhand embarrassment. Interestingly enough, this is intentional – the creators seem to be aiming for an awkward, cringeworthy experience.

This movie isn’t suitable for everyone due to its adult humor. It features crude jokes about bodily functions, troubled family dynamics, an unusual take on superheroes meeting for speed dating, and a fair share of genital humor. If you’re someone who appreciates this kind of comedy, rest assured that the film offers plenty of it.

The Critical Rating Is in the Toilet… Which is Fitting

It seems there might be a leniency needed as this film doesn’t appear to aspire towards greatness, but the Rotten Tomatoes reviews suggest otherwise – they call it dreadful, unfunny, and downright terrible. Despite its frequent use of bathroom humor, such feedback wouldn’t have made for good news for the creators or stars like Gerard Butler, Naomi Watts, Kate Winslet (on par with A Kid in King Arthur’s Court), Chris Pratt, Live Schreiber, and Hugh Jackman. This offbeat film seems to be the lowest-rated project for many of its cast members. The audience score for Movie 43 is only slightly better at 24%, indicating that even audiences were left scratching their heads over this production.

As a die-hard cinema lover, I’d strongly recommend you to give the US version of this flick a try, despite its brief 90-minute runtime. The tale of Dennis Quaid’s relentless movie producer character may not be a compelling narrative, but it presents a more structured chaos compared to its international counterpart. In the global edition, we follow three teenagers on an internet quest for the wildest film ever, titled “Movie 43.” Their search leads them to discover the individual sketches that make up this hard-to-find movie. However, unlike the US version where these sketches are tied together by the hopes of a desperate producer, in this version, they stand alone as random films lurking on the dark web. This haphazard replacement adds no value to the film and takes away any semblance of consistency it might have had.

In essence, the movie titled “Movie 43 ” was designed with a particular niche audience in mind. The idea to combine comedic elements across multiple films without a traditional narrative structure didn’t seem to work favorably for its creators. Similar to how Alecko Bialystock and Bloom inadvertently produced a smash hit with their disastrous stage play, the team behind “Movie 43” aimed to create an extremely offensive film that would appeal to their audience. However, the outcome was far from successful, setting a disappointing standard for some of Hollywood’s most prominent stars. Despite its flaws, the movie managed to fulfill its objective. For those who enjoy awkward and tasteless humor, “Movie 43” certainly delivers in abundance.

Read More

2025-01-09 01:03