As a gamer who’s spent countless hours poring over every pixel of retro games like “Myst” and “The Sims,” I can’t help but see a striking resemblance between this Friends continuity debate and the quest for finding hidden Easter eggs in my favorite video games.
People who watched Friends during its original airing in the ’90s and early 2000s might have suspected that it would become one of the greatest sitcoms ever made, but I doubt anyone could have foreseen the extent to which we’d still analyze every scene decades later. Fans have noticed subtle details such as the variations in Rachel’s surname, and now, with Jennifer Aniston’s “commando” dress causing a stir, they’re even scrutinizing potential continuity errors in her wedding dress.
In the debut episode of Friends, for the first time we encounter Rachel Green, she’s wearing a wedding dress following her abrupt exit from the altar with Barry. Fast forward to Season 4, in “The One With All the Wedding Dresses,” Rachel donned white again, this time teaming up with Monica (Courteney Cox) and Phoebe (Lisa Kudrow) to boost their spirits amidst relationship woes. A thoughtful fan on Reddit shared side-by-side photos of the dresses and pondered:
I know it’s a different dress in real life, but in the SHOW is this supposed to be the same dress?
It’s an intriguing question, and it seems that many fans of “Friends” didn’t contemplate this. From a narrative perspective, it could be plausible for Jennifer Aniston’s character to still own the gown from the Barry wedding. However, in terms of continuity, it’s evidently a different dress.
Due to the identical style, numerous viewers assumed that the dress worn in Season 4 was the exact same one from the very first episode. Remarks ranged from surprise to confusion about this apparent wardrobe repetition.
- I always just thought that rachel had kept her wedding dress and this was it! – tobiasfunketheactor
- Wow, I thought this the whole time as well! – ElmarSuperstar131
- That’s what I thought. Why would she get rid of it? – MulberryEastern5010
- I always thought it was supposed to be the same dress – ally_mcgee
- I think it’s supposed to be the same dress. They probably got rid of the original and replaced it for this episode hoping no one would notice it was different. – motheroflostthings
In that Season 4 episode, it’s clear Monica wore Emily’s wedding dress, Phoebe rented her maternity gown from It’s Not Too Late, but the show didn’t explain where Rachel got hers. Many viewers speculated she followed Phoebe’s approach and opted for a rental. Others on Reddit suggested:
- That never occurred to me, I’d always assumed she simply rented it from the same place Phoebe got hers – SammyGuevara
- I thought they said that they were both rented. I just assumed Rachel had a style she preferred – Guardian_Izy
- It’s a rented one isn’t it? – freakstate
- It never occurred to me it would be the same dress! No one is going to feel better about their love life by sitting around in the dress they wore to abandon their cheating fiance at the alter, so I just assumed it’s a different one. – Fedelm
- I never even considered that, I always assumed she rented it like Phoebe did. Great catch! – Hup110516
Initially, I thought she had rented the dress, but upon closer comparison, it’s clear now that the gowns are different. Using a tool I occasionally use called logical reasoning, it seems plausible that she kept the dress stored away in her closet all this time. This is unless… there’s another explanation.
One fan gave a pretty strong argument for why Rachel might not have had her wedding dress on hand anymore:
She probably returned it and got store credit.
Without a doubt, that’s something Rachel Karen Green would do. If you fancy re-living her wedding dress antics or any other hilarious moments from Friends, you can stream all 10 seasons with a Max subscription.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-11-20 17:37