Quick Links
- ’13’ Attempted to Improve on ’13 Tzameti’
- What Makes ’13 Tzameti’ So Great
- How ’13’ Failed Despite Having the Same Director and Star Power
As a film enthusiast with a soft spot for indie films that pack a punch, I found myself utterly captivated by the raw and haunting tale of 13 Tzameti. Having watched both the original (2005) and its remake (2010), I can confidently say that the original is the diamond in the rough.
The remake of a foreign film is one of the biggest gripes of those who embrace cinema on the international stage. As one studio executive says while begging for his life against a film-driven terrorist in John Waters’ Cecil B. Demented when confronted about ruining a beautiful foreign film, “I had to! You know American audiences won’t watch subtitles!” This has long been a joke for many, with the majority of these projects not only falling short of the original but failing to capture nearly the same amount of interest.
Back in 2010, I (as a movie buff) found myself intrigued when the title “13” was announced, being a remake of the 2005 French film “13 Tzameti”. The original had been given a facelift, boasting a contemporary cast and a substantial budget. However, it was director Géla Babluani who returned to guide this remake.
’13’ Attempted to Improve on ’13 Tzameti’
In essence, both films share a similar storyline, albeit with some character name adjustments and additional backstory. The fundamental plot of both “13 Tzameti” and its remake revolves around an individual facing financial struggles who learns that someone they know has obtained a highly lucrative position. Upon the unexpected demise of this person, the protagonist – Sébastien in the original and Vince in the remake – assumes the job without being aware of the specifics. However, upon arrival under the veil of an imposing group, the man discovers that he has been enrolled in a Russian roulette competition alongside others, compelled to participate. If he survives, he stands to win a substantial portion of the wagered money. The film derives its title from the number assigned to the main character.
2010’s movie “13” featured a powerful cast including Sam Riley, Ray Winstone, Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson, Alexander Skarsgård, Micheal Shannon, David Zayas, Mickey Rourke, and Jason Statham. However, contrary to the film’s poster, Jason Statham’s character, Jasper Bagges, plays a supporting role. The main protagonist, Vince, played by Sam Riley, is the film’s central figure. Notably, Riley had just wrapped up his most notable performance at that time, portraying tragic musician Ian Curtis in the semi-autobiographical film “Control.” In contrast, George Babluani made his screen debut as the lead in the original French movie “13 Tzameti,” where he was unwittingly thrust into a lethal game of chance.
What Makes ’13 Tzameti’ So Great
As a movie reviewer, I must say that the original 2005 French film version of 13 Tzameti leaves an indelible mark of bleakness that lingers long after the credits roll. The minimalistic black and white cinematography serves not just as a stylistic choice, but as a powerful tool to amplify the discomfort and terror felt by the protagonist, Sébastien, as he navigates from a struggling young man to an unwilling participant in an incomprehensible tournament. The horror is palpable, with every scene subtly cued towards conveying Sébastien’s raw fear as he plunges deeper into the competition.
Although both films follow a similar storyline, there’s an unpolished intensity about 13 Tzameti that leaves a lasting impression on the viewer. The climax, which is a must-see, is profoundly heart-wrenching (it’s bleak and disheartening), yet somehow fitting given all that transpired before it. George Babluani delivers an exceptional first acting performance, surrounded by other actors who either portray the depravity or desperation typical of the underground gambling world. In essence, 13 Tzameti is one of those uncommon independent films that captures something so ominous, presents it masterfully, and leaves you shaken to your core.
How ’13’ Failed Despite Having the Same Director and Star Power
One aspect of cinema’s ‘star power’ that isn’t typically discussed is this: While audiences adore familiar faces in numerous films, sometimes a newcomer can make a story feel more impactful and profound. As actors gain recognition, fans develop expectations, connect them with past roles, and often find themselves typecast. The film “13 Tzameti” required that fresh face to delve into its themes of isolation, as the inclusion of established actors like Jason Statham or Mickey Rourke might have distracted viewers from the immersion in a gritty, perverse slice of humanity hidden away from public scrutiny.
The decision to broaden the narrative by delving into the backstories of numerous characters engaged in gambling, instead enhanced the spectacle but diminished the original’s appeal for many. This transformation of a captivating film, 13 Tzameti, into something commonplace focused on the cast, 13, was regrettable. Despite efforts to provide greater roles for the main characters, the actors’ talents were not fully utilized. It appeared that director Géla Babluani struggled to translate his previous work’s depth while still attracting audiences to theaters; the movie earned only $3.7 million at the box office against a production budget of $20 million.
As a big fan myself, I highly recommend you to check out both movies and make up your own mind. However, if you’re limited to picking just one, I strongly suggest giving the 2005 film titled “13 Tzameti” a watch. Unfortunately, 13 Tzameti isn’t available for streaming right now, but the 2010 movie with the same name is accessible on Tubi. Enjoy your movie time!
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-12-23 01:01