John Lithgow Trashes Trump, Mum on Cancel Culture, Blacklist 2.0

by

John Lithgow can do it all.

  • Comedy? “3rd Rock from the Sun.”
  • Drama? “Footloose”
  • Horror? “The Rule of Jenny Pen.”
  • John Irving-esque fiction? “The World According to Garp.”

Give credit to the far-Left NPR which effectively summed up Lithgow’s body of work.

It appears that John Lithgow has quite a diverse acting career: he’s been involved in theater, films, and television, portraying both virtuous and villainous characters, with a significant emphasis on complex roles. Notably, he played Winston Churchill in The Crown and a diminutive king in Shrek. This actor is not afraid to step out of his comfort zone, tackle unconventional parts, and bring depth to both the profound and the absurd.

Currently, a 79-year-old individual is challenging President Donald Trump’s plans for revamping The Kennedy Center located in Washington D.C. It remains uncertain what adjustments will be implemented at the institution or if the proposed “new leadership” will positively impact its fiscal health.

It’s too soon to tell.

Not for Lithgow, who attacked Trump as a threat to the arts.

Initially, we faced the coronavirus, but currently, there’s another issue at hand,” he continued, expressing his concern that the state of the arts in America is nothing short of catastrophic and deeply troubling.

Absolutely, that’s a valid perspective, and given Lithgow’s extensive background in the arts, it’s hard to argue with him. However, it raises an uncomfortable yet important question.

Of course, his viewpoint makes sense, especially considering Lithow’s deep involvement in the arts. Yet, it stirs up a somewhat uneasy but essential query.

Where has Lithgow been over the past few years?

Investigating the topic “John Lithgow and Cancel Culture” online, it appears that there isn’t much content about this specific subject on the initial search pages. One might wonder why a renowned figure like John Lithgow, with a significant influence in the industry, didn’t utilize his power to advocate for artists to have the freedom to express their stories as they see fit.

Have we overlooked the comedians who faced penalties or self-restrained due to inappropriate humor? It’s essential to remember that numerous stand-up comics have been cautious out of concern for potential backlash. Desus and Mero, during their peak popularity, openly acknowledged such self-censorship.

Does Lithgow think they were alone in doing so? Does he care?

Is the seasoned actor, who’s not just on screen but also a writer with published work, offering his thoughts on the sensitivity readers who are critically reviewing the works of Ian Fleming, Roald Dahl, and Agatha Christie, making adjustments to their stories?

Is there no issue with the criticisms directed towards author Jeanine Cummins, who wrote a narrative about a Mexican immigrant despite not being of Mexican descent herself?

Cummins could have used an ally like Lithgow at the height of her cancellation.

Additionally, we find ourselves discussing the Hollywood Blacklist Version 2.0. It’s common knowledge that conservatives often face unfair treatment in the Hollywood industry. As a result, many choose to conceal their political beliefs out of concern for potential career repercussions. This has been a recurring issue for quite some time.

Is the actor unaware of it? Perhaps. Could he be oblivious to all of the above?

Unlikely.

It’s important for artists to ensure that President Trump is truthful regarding creative freedom, as he has expressed intentions to suppress criticism from artists, such as “Saturday Night Live,” but has yet to carry out these threats.

It’s all bluster, thank goodness. If that changes, Lithgow could lead the charge against him.

It’d be great if he also expressed opinions about other challenges in the arts, particularly when they don’t align with his progressive perspective.

Just ask James Woods or Kevin Sorbo. Those canceled actors would like a word with Lithgow.

Read More

2025-04-09 04:03