Why ‘Lucky 13’ Became the Biggest Game Show Disaster of 2024!

by

Television game shows are among the most dependable and entertaining formats in broadcasting. They’re simple to create and effortless to binge-watch. Each game show has its unique collection of questions, rules, and rewards. However, they all share a common fundamental belief: if contestants win money on the program, it’s essential to honor their winnings. Unfortunately, it appears that ABC’s latest series Lucky 13 overlooked this crucial piece of advice.

From July to September 2024, this trivia show featured Gina Rodriguez and Shaquille O’Neal as co-hosts, an unexpected combination indeed. Kevin Bacon served as an executive producer, adding another layer of intrigue. The concept was simple enough: contestants answered a sequence of true or false questions and accumulated money when they got the right answer a certain number of times. Unfortunately, internal disputes between the show and its production company disrupted these plans, eventually leading the production company to file for bankruptcy.

The show “Lucky 13” encountered financial difficulties, putting the contestants’ prizes at risk. In an unexpected turn of events, ABC agreed to cover the costs, but how did this popular game show get into such a predicament? While many other shows have successfully paid their prize money, why is “Lucky 13” seemingly jinxed? Is it fair to label it as the worst new game show when it premiered alongside “Beast Games”? The issues with “Lucky 13” might stem from the business strategy used to acquire the show.

How Is ‘Lucky 13’ Played?

As a film enthusiast, let me share my take on the intriguing game show “Lucky 13”. It initially appears to be a regular question-and-answer format, but there’s more to it than meets the eye. In each episode, one lucky contestant is chosen from a pool of thirteen and posed a sequence of thirteen true-or-false questions without any hint about the correct or incorrect answers. The show seems to have a penchant for its title. It’s a thrilling guessing game where the contestant must estimate how many correct answers they think they provided.

Contestants choose a specific category for their prize based on the number of correct answers they believe they’ve given. The categories are:

* 1-3 correct answers: Winning prize is $5,000 plus an additional $30,000 if the selected lucky number matches the exact number of correct answers.
* 4-6 correct answers: Winning prize is $15,000 plus an additional $40,000 if the selected lucky number matches the exact number of correct answers.
* 7-9 correct answers: Winning prize is $25,000 plus an additional $50,000 if the selected lucky number matches the exact number of correct answers.
* 10-12 correct answers: Winning prize is $100,000 plus an additional $125,000 if the selected lucky number matches the exact number of correct answers.
* 13 correct answers: Winning prize is $1,000,000 plus an additional $125,000 if the selected lucky number matches the exact number of correct answers.

They also select a “lucky number” within their chosen category that they think corresponds to the exact number of correct answers they gave. If their actual number of correct responses matches their selected lucky number, their prize will be increased according to the corresponding multiplier (30,000 for 1-3, 40,000 for 4-6, 50,000 for 7-9, or 125,000 for 10-12).

During the progression of responses, the program takes inspiration from “Deal or No Deal.” The contestant is given an opportunity to exit the game prematurely and receive a portion of their potential winnings, thanks to a buyout offer. If they choose not to accept it, all remaining answers are disclosed. However, there’s always a chance they might end up beyond their chosen range.

For example, if a contestant chooses “between 7 and 9 correct answers” but manages to answer all 10 questions correctly after turning down the buyout, they walk away with nothing – a unique twist that makes this game show perhaps the only one where you could be punished for having too many correct responses. However, if they end up within the specified range of “7 to 9”, they take home the prize. By the end of the first season’s 10 episodes, the contestants had accumulated a total of $461,500 in winnings.

The Way It All Went Wrong for ‘Lucky 13’

The potential reason for everything going awry could be traced back to the unique business strategy employed by “Lucky 13”. Instead of following a regular distribution system, the production company Studio 1 agreed to finance the show upfront in return for a portion of ad and product placement earnings. Initially, the series had a good start, outperforming summer game show norms in terms of ratings. However, the numbers soon plummeted, leading to financial troubles for Studio 1. The frequent ad breaks that were essential for revenue generation ended up causing viewer exhaustion with the show. Consequently, the ad earnings from “Lucky 13” fell significantly below Studio 1’s projections, resulting in the series being canceled in November 2024.

As a loyal fan, I found myself disheartened when Studio 1, in an attempt to overhaul its business approach, unfortunately faced financial ruin (as reported by Deadline). This unfortunate turn of events meant that the likes of Shaquille O’Neal, Jennifer Lopez, contractors, producers, and contestants like us were left uncompensated for our contributions. ABC and the associated production companies tirelessly pursued Studio 1 for payment, yet to no avail.

Even more alarming was the revelation that Studio 1 faced investigation in the UK due to unpaid debts. Despite assurances from both Studio 1 and ABC that we’d receive our winnings, the promised deadline of 120 days post-filming came and went without resolution. In February 2025, ABC stepped up as a hero by covering the $460k owed to us contestants, even though they had no legal obligation to do so. Studio 1 seemingly declined to comment on the matter.

In essence, it seems that networks might be wary about adopting this financial model again due to its high cost, especially given the current climate where broadcasters are trying to minimize expenses. A bill amounting nearly to half a million dollars isn’t exactly what they’re after in these cost-cutting times. However, game shows, as a category, generally present a secure financial venture because they can be efficiently and swiftly produced, and they typically draw a sizable audience. Consequently, it is likely that networks will persist in favoring less expensive, unscripted programming over time, as the majority of viewership continues to shift towards streaming platforms.

Read More

2025-04-12 20:02