Late-Night Liars Hide Biden’s Decline (Again!)

by

“‘Original Sin?’ What ‘Original Sin?’”

This year’s highly discussed book has been on shelves for several weeks now. Its disclosures have sent shockwaves through Washington D.C. and media communities, alike.

The fallout has only begun.

Indeed, there have been allegations that President Joe Biden experienced some form of unacknowledged cognitive issues during his tenure in the Oval Office, and these claims suggest a significant impact on his time in office. The book’s investigations expose what appears to be widespread bias and manipulation within mainstream media, although it seems the authors themselves may not acknowledge this openly.

The book poses a question that remains unresolved, urgently seeking clarification. Specifically, who served as the President during the last four years?

Comedians who perform late at night show little interest in finding out the solution. In fact, they’ve largely chosen to disregard the astonishing facts presented in authors Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson’s book, with only a few exceptions like Greg Gutfeld from Fox News.

Fox News reviewed the latest comedy shows by Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, and others. Their findings showed that they collectively chose not to address or comment on the content of the recently published book or its shocking disclosures.

The most vocal late-night talk show hosts have fallen quiet following the latest disclosures about President Joe Biden’s perceived cognitive issues, which some attribute to their longstanding friendly associations with the ex-president.

Regardless of the buzz surrounding the book, comedians like Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, and Seth Meyers haven’t brought up any of its revelations in their shows, as per Grabien transcripts.

Truthful commentary on powerful figures? Humor drawn from current news events? Regrettably, these comedians were accused of not being satirical.

It gets worse.

Fox News highlights another aspect linked to late-night liberal TV hosts, a subject HiT has been discussing for several months now. In the past summer, Colbert and Kimmel alternated in hosting fundraisers for President Biden, yet they didn’t disclose to their viewers the extent to which the President appeared weakened after having close encounters with him.

Kimmel deceived viewers regarding Biden’s cognitive ability, advising Americans not to trust their own perceptions. This came after late-night comedians declined to make jokes about the leader’s noticeable deterioration for years – until the June 27 debate where Biden’s mental confusion seemingly ended his re-election hopes.

Kimmel did it again last week on a separate but vital matter.

Last year, prior to the election, it was noticed by many Americans that the news program “60 Minutes” had edited an important interview with Vice President Kamala Harris in a way that raised some eyebrows. They particularly highlighted a brief exchange between Harris and her interviewer concerning the Israel-Palestinian conflict, which seemed to portray a challenging question posed to Harris.

Later in the show, the same question was posed to Harris again, but this time she responded with a clearer and more concise answer, thanks to the editing team at CBS. Her demeanor shifted from uncertain to determined.

Essentially, that’s a lesson in misleading video editing techniques. This is one of the reasons President Donald Trump is taking legal action against CBS News and has declined their proposed settlement of $15 million.

We saw and heard the two very different Harris responses. It’s clear as day.

The “60 Minutes” edit took place during Harris’ response to Bill Whitaker’s question about Israel. In the preview, Harris said, “Our efforts have led to some significant actions taken by Israel in that area, which were heavily influenced or consequences of various factors, including our advocacy for what should transpire in the region.

Word Salad 101.

In the broadcasted interview after editing, Harris responded to the repeated query by saying, “We won’t cease our efforts to make it unequivocal that the U.S. stands firm on the requirement for this conflict to conclude.

Cue Kimmel lying once again despite the truth being available for all to see.

Trump, known for seizing chances to complain and manipulate the law, asserted, without any proof, that ’60 Minutes’ deceitfully edited the interview in a way that unjustly enhanced his adversary’s image.

Isn’t it obvious that Trump’s case would be dismissed without merit if there was no evidence supporting his claim? And isn’t it also clear that we, the public, have the ability to compare Harris’ two responses and observe the differences ourselves?

Maybe yes. Maybe no. It doesn’t matter.

Comedians working late at night often manipulate or conceal facts to align with their personal beliefs, which can be troubling and not amusing.

Read More

2025-06-02 22:03