Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds Fan Theories & Ending Explained

by

As a cinephile who has spent countless hours delving into the depths of cinema history, I find Alfred Hitchcock’s masterpiece, “The Birds,” to be nothing short of a cinematic tour de force. The way Hitchcock uses symbolism, psychological tension, and suspense to create an eerie and unsettling atmosphere is truly remarkable.

In 1963, Alfred Hitchcock, famously known as the Master of Suspense, unveiled “The Birds.” This movie sparked various interpretations among film enthusiasts regarding its underlying message. While Hitchcock hinted at the story being a form of revenge against humans’ mistreatment of birds, he deliberately kept the reasons behind the sudden attack by swarms of aggressive birds vague. This ambiguity further fueled speculation.

Over time, additional interpretations surfaced, connecting the movie to various aspects of Sigmund Freud’s psychology, feminine sexuality, human disregard for nature, among others. The narrative also carries underlying themes such as romantic love and a mother’s envy. However, the ending remains enigmatic, failing to provide a definitive explanation.

Different movie enthusiasts categorize Alfred Hitchcock’s oeuvre as either horror or thriller. Some hold firm to the first, while others prefer the latter. Many of his timeless films, such as “The Birds”, straddle this boundary. Nevertheless, there is general consensus on one point: it’s a haunting, unsettling, and thought-provoking masterpiece that maintains its impact more than six decades after its creation.

How Much of The Birds Is Fact or Fiction?

Hitchcock, known for directing more than 50 films, frequently has “The Birds” recognized as one of his best works. What makes this film unique among his other classics is its focus on ordinary birds transforming into sudden and ominous threats, rather than humans. As reported by Popular Science, Hitchcock drew inspiration from real-life incidents. In 1961, while adapting Daphne du Maurier’s book “The Birds” into a screenplay, there was news that eight individuals in Santa Cruz, California, were attacked without provocation by sooty shearwater birds.

As a cinephile, I found myself immersed in the intriguing tale spun by the masterful Hitchcock, where an initially unsympathetic lead character, socialite Melanie Daniels (played brilliantly by Tippi Hedren), crossed paths with lawyer Mitch Brenner (Rod Taylor) in a pet store. Brenner made light of Daniels, which she retaliated against playfully by sending two lovebirds as a surprise to his home in Bodega Bay. This act symbolized the contrast between tamed affection (and perhaps repression) and unfettered freedom, with the caged birds representing the former and their wild counterparts, the latter.

The setting shifts to a diner, where conversations revolve around the apocalyptic atmosphere echoing the storyline Hitchcock partially drew from. Initially, it’s proposed that the birds are disoriented by the fog. A customer suddenly interjects, “Hey, something similar occurred in Santa Cruz not long ago.” To which another replies, “A massive group of seagulls got trapped in the fog and mistakenly flew towards the town with all its lights.” However, this straightforward explanation leaves many wanting to explore further depth.

Another Mother and Son Dynamic?

As a cinephile, I often find myself pondering if Alfred Hitchcock intentionally crafted his films with multiple layers of meaning. According to Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic theory, our unconscious mind is a treasure trove of repressed emotions, hidden memories, habits, thoughts, and desires that our conscious mind seeks to suppress. Hitchcock seemed to delve into this concept in several of his films, such as the tormented character Norman Bates from Psycho (1960) and the enigmatic Marnie from the 1964 film bearing her name.

In the movie “The Birds,” it is suggested that the aggressive birds might symbolize the repressed emotions of Lydia Brennan (played by Jessica Tandy), a possessive, neurotic mother who fears losing her son to another woman. Interestingly, Alfred Hitchcock had recently directed “Psycho,” another film exploring complex mother-son relationships. The character Annie, who smokes frequently and may be sexually frustrated, hints at Mitch’s lack of romantic involvements with women, saying, “Perhaps there has never been anything between Mitch and any girl.” However, filmwriter Jonathon Simmons is less convinced, noting that the birds start amassing over Union Square before Lydia and Mitch have even met Melanie.

The Birds & Women’s Sexual Liberation

During that era, the term “Bird” was often used as slang for women, especially in Alfred Hitchcock’s homeland, which is why the title brings to mind the colloquialism, “the birds and the bees.” Let’s discuss the topic of sexuality. The 1960s in America was a period marked by sexual experimentation. Women gained control over their bodies with the introduction of the contraceptive pill. The character Melanie Daniels, hailing from liberal San Francisco, posed a threat to the more traditional housewives of Bodega Bay. Notably, Daniels aggressively pursued a man, and there were whispers about her reportedly stripping naked and jumping into a fountain in Rome.

Daniels led an unfettered existence in San Francisco, disregarding societal opinions. The bay’s women found her both repulsive and intriguing, even eliciting a touch of envy. Their subconscious thoughts regarding sexuality and their role in society resurface, manifesting as birds. This ties into Freud’s concept of the uncanny, where childhood beliefs that we have since outgrown suddenly appear real. According to James Ruers, “The uncanny emerges when old beliefs unexpectedly seem true again. Freud termed it ‘the return of the repressed.'” In The Birds, Daniels introduces sexuality to Bodega Bay, igniting a surge in the suppressed desires of its sexually frustrated inhabitants.

Explaining The Birds’ Eerie Ending

The film’s underlying message is about the environment. It shows that while humans may claim to care for the planet and its wildlife, their actions often fall short of fairness. Instead, it’s humans who bring misery to Earth, not birds. In a preview for the movie, Hitchcock humorously comments, “The film centers on the birds and their timeless bond with man.” However, he uses irony when he calls birds ‘man’s friends.’ He then goes on to illustrate this irony by discussing the imprisonment of hens for their eggs and the confinement of birds in small cages as pets, preventing them from enjoying the sunshine.

As the story nears its climax, I find myself recognizing the importance of the strong bonds between women – a sisterhood that gives us strength. In a poignant moment, Daniels begins to see Lydia Brennan as a maternal figure, her comfort after the vicious raven attack in the attic serving as a turning point. A hush falls over the scene as Brennan, with Daniels in her arms, and his mother and sister Cathy slip into the car. It’s almost as if, once Daniels, Mitch, and his mother found acceptance and love within each other, the rage of the birds subsided.

In a curious twist, the affectionate duo from the bird shop likewise departed in their vehicle. Interestingly, Daniels’ attire throughout the movie matched the green hue of the lovebirds confined within their enclosure. It seems that perhaps Melanie Daniels yearned for love all along – whether caged or free. However, as Hitchcock intended, that interpretation remains up to the viewer.

Watch The Birds

Read More

2024-11-14 04:33