As a lifelong fan of the Joker, I must admit that I approached the premiere of “Joker: Folie à Deux” with great anticipation. Having grown up watching and rewatching Heath Ledger’s iconic portrayal of the Clown Prince of Crime in The Dark Knight, Joaquin Phoenix’s first outing as the Joker left me spellbound. So, when I heard that a sequel was in the works, I couldn’t contain my excitement.
Opinions were divided among critics during the premiere of “Joker: Folie à Deux” at the Venice International Film Festival last month. On one hand, some reviewers like Eric Eisenberg from TopMob found it hard to endure due to its persistent brutality and excessive musical sequences. Conversely, others were thrilled, particularly praising Joaquin Phoenix’s acting performance. For our own Sean O’Connell, the film significantly altered his perspective on the original one. As audiences begin to voice their opinions ahead of its 2024 release, it appears that the upcoming Batman movie is receiving some harsh criticism.
In the critical evaluation at Rotten Tomatoes, the following chapter of Arthur Fleck has earned a 48% rating. However, it’s the audience responses where the Todd Phillips sequel appears to be experiencing significant setbacks. For example, one verified user named Paul only awarded the film 1 out of 5 stars and commented:
This movie wasn’t enjoyable for me. Despite having excellent actors, it felt like a bizarre blend of “A Star is Born” and “The Joker.” It was overly dramatic with too much singing throughout, making it rather frustrating to watch. The action didn’t start until the very end, which made the beginning quite slow. I enjoyed the original film, but this sequel left much to be desired. Most of the movie took place in a jail or courthouse setting, and I found it tedious to watch. In all honesty, I don’t think you would miss out on anything by skipping this movie; it’s not really worth investing your time into.
I find the title description for the sequel, “A Star Is Born: Joker Spinoff,” particularly appealing given that Lady Gaga deliberately sang off-key in her portrayal of Lee Quinzel (also known as Harley Quinn). It seems that many viewers’ complaints revolve around the musical aspects of the sequel. Other responses encompass a range of opinions.
- Didn’t realize it was a musical. Terrible ending for a joker film. – Marie
- I was excited to see this but was disappointed. They tried to make it a musical but most of the singing wasn’t good. Not much of a story and little to no comedy. It was depressing really. – Bryan
- Save your money. I do enjoy broadway but not for joker movie. – German G.
- Ridiculously unnecessary and boring. – WTF
- Awful movie, waiting this long for the second part and they made so bad. – Raul E.
- Hated it and left with a headache. Such a disappointment. – Ayssa
If you find it puzzling that the 2019 Oscar-winning film’s sequel could become a musical, you’re in good company. The creators appear to be uncertain about the genre themselves, as Lady Gaga, one of the key figures, initially stated it wasn’t a musical, yet later characterized it as what one would typically associate with a musical.
As a gamer diving back into Gotham City, I can confirm that Todd Phillips’ “Joker: Folie à Deux” is more than just a continuation of Arthur Fleck’s tale from the first movie. In fact, Phillips views this as something other than a traditional sequel. However, some viewers like myself have found ourselves somewhat distracted by the catchy tunes, and I must admit, I’m skeptical about the claims that it’s not a musical. After all, when the rhythm takes over, it’s hard not to tap your toes!
Independent of how WB, Todd Phillips, or anyone else characterizes this movie, there’s no argument that it’s a musical. Although it doesn’t have extensive musical sequences like traditional musicals, there are brief, one to one and a half verse songs scattered throughout the film. However, I found it rather dull, particularly when compared to the original. I couldn’t invest myself in it, instead, I found myself eagerly anticipating the next moment of singing.
Another authentic cinema-goer, ELI, expresses his opinion that the upcoming film “Joker 2” may not live up to expectations for fans of the iconic Batman villain, as he feels it might be disappointing.
It seems they overlooked Joker enthusiasts when making decisions, as the music came off as dull and awkward. I really hoped to enjoy this film, but unfortunately, it turned out to be a major disappointment of the year.
Despite some unfavorable reviews, it’s still probable that numerous cinema-goers will flock to theaters this weekend, primarily due to their fondness for the initial film. However, critiques such as the one from Moon might not boost those box office figures significantly.
This movie seems devoid of purpose, as the musical sequences appear to stall the narrative rather than advance it. If these elements were removed, one could argue that the story would have been suitable for a 40-minute television special. Sadly, this sequel undermines the significance and impact of the initial film (which I adored deeply). I find myself astonished by the direction taken in this movie. Here’s hoping others appreciate it more than I do, but personally, I believe this film diminishes an exceptionally remarkable first film.
What stands out the most is that the critics of the movie “Joker: Folie à Deux” seemed to be expecting to adore it. It’s possible that the musical aspect shifted the mood too drastically for their taste, but whatever the reason, the feedback has been harsh. If you’re curious about the commotion, the sequel will premiere in theaters on October 4. If you prefer to revisit the original, “Joker” is currently streaming with a Max subscription.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-10-03 17:37