As a researcher with experience in the crypto industry, I share Jai Massari’s concerns over SAB 121’s veto. The treatment of digital asset custody by large, regulated financial institutions under this policy seems unfair and lacks a solid regulatory foundation. The negative effects on consumer convenience and choice are significant, and it stifles competition and innovation in the crypto space.
Jai Massari, the co-founder and Chief Legal Officer of Lightspark, has voiced concerns over the SAB 121 veto. According to him, this action goes against the consumer protection, innovation, and competition-promoting intentions in crypto regulations.
In a recent tweet, she highlighted her concern with SAB 121, stating, “This rule unfairly penalizes the custody of digital assets by large, regulated financial institutions compared to other types of assets, lacking any substantial justification or regulatory foundation.”
I, as an analyst, would put it this way: Massari argues that SAB 121 unjustifiably targets regulated financial institutions for their handling of digital asset custody due to its weak policy and regulatory foundation. She underscores the detrimental impact on consumer convenience and selection, while tackling concerns related to the SEC staff’s application of accounting advice.
Massaru pointed out, “Maybe crypto regulations aren’t a priority for the Administration right now. However, the repercussions of such an approach could cause significant harm beyond just this issue.”
As a cryptocurrency analyst, I’ve noticed a strong consensus within the community that calls for fair and transparent regulation. This sentiment resonates with Massari’s concerns. The general belief is that Securities Act Bulletin 121 (SAB 121) inadvertently suppresses competition and innovation, favoring regulations that prioritize consumer protection and market growth instead.
Some propose reevaluating regulatory approaches to tackle broader concerns in the cryptocurrency industry.
As a crypto investor, I can’t help but express my disappointment in the recent regulatory decision, especially since Senator Cynthia Lummis, a fellow supporter of digital assets, has voiced her criticism as well. She believes that the administration missed an opportunity to reconsider its stance on cryptocurrencies.
Read More
- MVRDV Designs Solar-Powered “Sports Club in a Shipping Container” For Refugees
- BICO PREDICTION. BICO cryptocurrency
- For K-Pop Superstars Twice, Sky’s the Limit: “We Want to Be a Part of History”
- EXCLUSIVE: Decoding the importance of suspense around cameos in cinematic universe films
- Abhijeet Bhattacharya’s son expresses displeasure over Dua Lipa and Shah Rukh Khan’s Levitating X Woh Ladki Jo mashup for not giving him credit; ‘Why has it always been about actors…’
- Roddy Ricch Taps Terrace Martin for Reflective “Lonely Road”
- FORT PREDICTION. FORT cryptocurrency
- RSR PREDICTION. RSR cryptocurrency
- Netflix’s Action Thriller Hit ‘Rebel Ridge’ Included on Coveted Best of 2024 List
- EUR INR PREDICTION
2024-06-01 23:32