Alec Baldwin ‘Rust’ Case Judge Calls Out “Deliberate Misconduct” By Prosecutors

Alec Baldwin ‘Rust’ Case Judge Calls Out “Deliberate Misconduct” By Prosecutors

As a seasoned gamer who has spent countless hours navigating through labyrinthine virtual worlds, this real-life drama unfolding in New Mexico feels strangely familiar. The intricate twists and turns, the hidden evidence, the characters that leap from one plotline to another – it’s like I’m playing an immersive narrative game where truth is often stranger than fiction.


The judge in New Mexico who dropped the involuntary manslaughter charges against Alec Baldwin has criticized the prosecutors for wrongdoing, stating they knowingly and purposely hid crucial evidence from the defense team.

Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer from the First Judicial District recently issued an order on a Wednesday, criticizing prosecutors for intentional and deliberate misconduct that led to the dismissal of charges against the actor. The lead special prosecutor, Kari Morrissey, was found by Sommer to have consistently failed to meet discovery obligations and also provided “inconsistent” testimony regarding the evidence she had withheld.

The trial for Baldwin’s involuntary manslaughter came to a sudden halt on July 12 in a surprising twist, during a complex hearing concerning the handling of some bullets by the police and prosecutors. This was connected to retired Arizona officer Troy Teske handing over a batch of live ammunition to the Santa Fe Sheriff’s Office. Although crime scene technician Marissa Poppell received the bullets, they were not logged as evidence in the Rust case, thereby concealing the proof from Baldwin and armorer Hannah Gutierrez.

According to Baldwin’s legal representatives, as Teske stated, the rounds he passed on contained Starline brass casings and nickel primers, which corresponded with the live bullet that fatally struck Halyna Hutchins, the cinematographer on the set of “Rust”.

In an unusual turn of events, when Morrissey chose to testify to uphold the case’s integrity, essentially finding herself in a position where she had no choice but to intervene, she declared, “The ammunition that Troy Teske possessed holds no significant evidential value for the Gutierrez case.” On multiple occasions, Morrissey emphasized that the bullets found were not a match for the round that took Hutchins’ life, and therefore, had no necessity to be shared with the defense.

As I stood there, facing both the prosecution and defense during the trial, I couldn’t help but notice that some of the bullets looked strikingly similar to those discovered on the movie set post-shooting, when Sommer was examining them in open court.

In its ruling on Wednesday, the court stated that Morrissey knowingly and intentionally kept the ammunition provided by Teske in a case not related to Rust, with the aim of hiding pertinent evidence. This material, according to the court, could have cleared Baldwin’s name.

“As a fan trying to understand the details, it seems the judge was referring to the evidence about who supplied the live bullet that tragically took Ms. Hutchins’ life on the ‘Rust’ set, along with information on how this bullet ended up there. This evidence could significantly impact the jury’s decision-making process regarding who might have been negligent or careless in a third party or parties.”

As a seasoned lawyer with years of experience in criminal defense, I have seen many cases where critical evidence has been withheld or mishandled, leading to a miscarriage of justice. The recent case involving Baldwin is one such instance that deeply concerns me. The late disclosure of crucial evidence has significantly altered the course of his defense. In my career, I’ve learned that forensic analysis of physical evidence can make or break a case, and in this instance, the failure to analyze the bullets leaves many questions unanswered.

As a gamer diving into this intriguing case, I took over after Andrea Reeb, the previous special prosecutor, made some questionable moves. For instance, she cited a firearm law that wasn’t applicable at the time of the shooting incident, and went on a media spree discussing case details prematurely. Her actions led to her stepping down due to a conflict of interest with her position in the New Mexico House of Representatives. Private emails suggested that she aimed to exploit this case for political benefits.

Read More

2024-08-03 02:25