Did WazirX casually omit 337 Bitcoin worth Rs 156 crore from affidavit?

As a seasoned crypto investor with years of experience navigating the volatile and unpredictable world of digital currencies, this latest development regarding WazirX is nothing short of alarming. I’ve seen my fair share of market fluctuations, scams, and regulatory challenges, but this discrepancy between declared and actual Bitcoin holdings by WazirX is a whole new ball game.


Following WazirX exchange seeking a moratorium from the Singapore High Court, there has been growing scrutiny about the assets listed by Zettai Pte Ltd, the holding company of the exchange, in their sworn statement.

A conflicting claim about the Bitcoin holdings of WazirX versus Zettai has surfaced, with multiple users stating that there’s a discrepancy amounting to 337 Bitcoins (approximately Rs 156.49 crores) between the real bitcoins held and those declared in the affidavit. This revelation follows Zettai seeking time from the Singapore High Court, approximately six months, to facilitate a restructuring plan for their users.

Based on tweets by well-known Indian crypto expert Aditya Singh (@cryptooady), there seems to be a discrepancy between the reported and actual Bitcoin held in WazirX’s main wallet. The affidavit submitted to the Singapore High Court indicates 1,138 BTC, while Aditya claims that the current balance stands at 1,475 BTC. This difference of approximately 337 Bitcoins, valued at about Rs 156.49 crores, has caused a stir and raised concerns regarding WazirX’s transparency and financial reporting.

Did WazirX casually omit 337 Bitcoin worth Rs 156 crore from affidavit?

Initially, Aditya Singh exposed a difference in the records; he then disclosed his discoveries about X. Through his investigation, it was found that the amount of Bitcoin owned by WazirX, as stated in the court document, is much lower than their actual holdings.

Did WazirX casually omit 337 Bitcoin worth Rs 156 crore from affidavit?

In the context of a petition seeking to reorganize WazirX’s financial commitments (a moratorium petition), the affidavit was anticipated to present an authentic and comprehensive account of their assets. However, Singh’s examination suggests discrepancies in the reported values, fueling suspicions about potential reasons for understating their Bitcoin reserves on the exchange.

Potential Implications

This disclosure has sparked debate among cryptocurrency enthusiasts, as some doubt the accuracy of WazirX’s financial records due to discrepancies in their Bitcoin reserves. These inconsistencies might suggest various possibilities, such as accounting mistakes, an effort to hide the actual state of the exchange’s finances, or a calculated move linked to its ongoing legal issues.

Both regulatory agencies and users express worry regarding the potential outcomes of this inconsistency. This situation might lead to additional examinations by authorities for WazirX, a platform that has previously been under scrutiny concerning regulatory compliance and internal controls. Such investigations could potentially damage the trust its users have in the service.

Legal and Regulatory Repercussions

In simpler terms, if WazirX’s stated and real Bitcoin holdings differ significantly, they could face legal repercussions. Providing false financial details in a court document, especially in a place like Singapore where the law is very strict, could result in harsh penalties.

In the Republic of Singapore’s High Court – where the affidavit was filed – there could be a request for more information regarding this inconsistency. If wrongdoing is proven, it might escalate into a legal proceeding.

Additionally, this matter might draw scrutiny from regulatory bodies in India, given that WazirX functions within India’s developing cryptocurrency laws. This event further complicates the regulatory hurdles that WazirX is already facing.

Read More

Sorry. No data so far.

2024-09-09 16:20