As a seasoned researcher with years of experience delving into intricate legal battles, I find the ongoing Nvidia securities fraud lawsuit to be a fascinating case study. The involvement of multiple high-profile entities such as the U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission adds credibility to the allegations against Nvidia.
The U.S. Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission have requested the Supreme Court to move forward with the legal action against Nvidia regarding alleged securities fraud.
In a legal document submitted on October 2nd, the U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar and senior lawyer from the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission), Theodore Weiman, expressed that America has a stake in the Nvidia case because it revolves around the conditions for accusing false statements and intent in private securities fraud class actions under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Both agencies argued that the class action had “sufficient details” that warrant the case to be reopened despite a prior court dismissal in 2021, adding the Supreme Court should greenlight its revival by an appeals court.
Given its significant stake, the U.S. has a vested concern in ensuring the correct formation of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). Previously, it has offered insights as a friend of the court in legal cases that dealt with understanding and implementing the PSLRA.
The U.S. Department of Justice
On the same day, twelve ex-SEC officials also submitted a supporting document (amicus brief) for the class action lawsuit. This document emphasized the crucial role of individual enforcement in upholding the honesty of U.S. stock markets under federal security laws.
Additionally, they argued that Nvidia demanded the class group be granted early access to “confidential company documents and databases” prior to the discovery phase, and sought to prohibit the use of experts during the initial stage of the case. However, these requests, according to the former officials, lack both legal backing and sound policy.
Nvidia faces crypto misrepresentation allegations
Furthermore, six more amicus briefs were submitted on October 2nd, each one coming from quantitative experts, legal scholars, institutional investors, the American Association for Justice, and the Anti-Fraud Coalition – all backing the class group.
Back in 2018, a group of people initiated a collective lawsuit against both Nvidia and its CEO, Jensen Huang. Their allegation was that Nvidia had deceived investors by understating the percentage of their revenue coming from cryptocurrency-related transactions.
In simpler terms, the party bringing the lawsuit claimed that the company broke the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by providing inaccurate or deceptive information about how much Nvidia’s earnings were tied to cryptocurrency mining.
2021 saw the dismissal of the lawsuit; however, a 2-1 decision by the San Francisco-based Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated it later. In 2022, Nvidia opted to settle accusations from U.S. officials by forking over $5.5 million. The allegations claimed that the company failed to provide sufficient information regarding the impact of crypto mining on its gaming operations.
Later in a Q2 2022 earnings conference, Nvidia’s Executive Vice President, Colette Kress, revealed that the company plans to exit entirely from the cryptocurrency market as a result of significant losses in revenue from their crypto-related operations.
In simple terms, Nvidia originally estimated that it would make approximately $400 million this year from producing hardware for cryptocurrency mining, but in reality, it earned only about one fifth (or 18%) of that projected amount.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-10-04 10:48