“I am very uncomfortable with Stablecoins”:India’s RBI Governor

by

As a seasoned researcher with extensive experience in global finance and economic policy, I find myself in agreement with Shaktikanta Das’ perspective on stablecoins and cryptocurrencies. Having witnessed the evolution of various financial systems and their impact on economies, I understand his discomfort with the idea of private entities controlling the payment system. The concept of ‘stable’ before stablecoins itself raises a fundamental question about their role in the ecosystem.

As a crypto investor, I found myself nodding in agreement at the sentiments expressed by Reserve Bank of India Governor Shaktikanta Das during the G30 39th Annual International Banking Seminar in Washington DC. In essence, he voiced his discomfort with the notion of “private money” like stablecoins and cryptocurrencies gaining dominance over our payment systems, potentially eroding the authority of local governments. This perspective resonates with me as an investor because it underscores the importance of maintaining a balance between innovation and preserving the integrity of financial systems.

Das expressed enthusiasm for Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), viewing them as the potential evolution of traditional currencies, and mentioned that India has received encouraging feedback regarding its CBDC trial programs. These statements were made amid discussions within the Indian government about a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. Despite crypto earnings being heavily taxed in India without any formal regulations, there have been speculations that the government may impose an outright ban on cryptos to encourage the use of CBDCs instead.

In simpler terms, Das pointed out that it seems odd to need to attach a ‘stable’ prefix before stablecoins, as he harbors significant doubts and questions about them. Specifically, he wonders if we are content with private money like stablecoins taking over the payment system, or if we should instead let traditional government-issued currencies continue to do so.

In essence, he highlighted that private currencies such as stablecoins and cryptocurrencies could potentially allow a select number of multinational corporations to control the payment system, resulting in a diminished control over currency matters for local governments. For those interested, the full conference can be viewed on YouTube.

In summary, Das pointed out two key points: first, fiat currency transactions do not carry settlement risk because once payment is made via Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), it’s backed by the government and central bank, eliminating the need for collateral; this is unlike CBDCs, where he finds stablecoins to be advantageous. However, Das expressed discomfort towards stablecoins, stating that he sees no benefits and perceives numerous risks associated with them. Furthermore, he foresees a potential monopoly of large companies in the ecosystem, which could lead to individual governments losing control over their monetary systems.

In essence, they enthusiastically endorsed Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) and emphasized their importance in shaping the future of physical currency. They highlighted various potential applications, such as facilitating quicker cross-border transactions.

In simpler terms, Das mentioned that India is leading the way in innovative payment solutions through United Payment Interface (UPI), making transactions safer, quicker, instant, and less costly. Remarkably, UPI processes approximately 500 million transactions daily. Moving forward, the focus is on integrating UPI with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). India initiated pilot projects for CBDCs two years ago and has received encouraging feedback. However, they’re taking their time before launching a nationwide rollout to ensure thorough testing of the design, features, security, and durability of CBDCs first.

Read More

2024-10-28 10:44