Jussie Smollett’s Conviction in Alleged Hoax Street Attack Overturned by Illinois Supreme Court

Jussie Smollett’s Conviction in Alleged Hoax Street Attack Overturned by Illinois Supreme Court

As a long-time fan of Jussie Smollett and his captivating performances in Empire, I have been following this rollercoaster ride of events with bated breath. The latest development, where the Illinois Supreme Court overturned his conviction, is indeed a relief.


In a decision made on Thursday by the Illinois Supreme Court, Jussie Smollett, the actor previously accused of staging a hate crime in Chicago in 2019, saw his conviction overturned. The ruling stated that it was unconstitutional for him to be prosecuted again after his case had initially been settled, as this infringed upon his right to fair legal treatment (due process).

Since the renewal of the case six months ago, following the dismissal of charges, Smollett has approached it from various perspectives. On Thursday, in a unanimous 5-0 decision, with two justices choosing not to participate, the court ruled that initiating a second legal case against Smollett infringed upon his right to due process.

In this case, we believe another trial after the one already conducted would be considered an infringement on due process rights. Consequently, we are overturning the defendant’s conviction as stated in the opinion by Judge Rochford.

Jussie Smollett, an African-American and gay actor who gained fame on Fox’s TV series “Empire,” declared in January 2019 that he was assaulted in the streets of Chicago by two African-American men. These individuals, Abimbola Osundairo and Olabinjo Osundairo, asserted that Smollett had directed them to attack him. According to their testimony, the actor planned the assault, detailing exactly how it should be carried out to the brothers. They also claimed that Smollett paid them $3500 to carry out this staged attack. However, Smollett continues to assert that his account of the incident was not a fabrication.

As a captivated spectator, I can’t help but recount the electrifying tale that unfolded when Chicago detectives unearthed an astonishing revelation. This narrative, which intertwined themes of race, sexuality, fame, social media, and political power, quickly sent shockwaves through the nation. The story broke out just as Trump ascended to the White House and the MAGA movement gained momentum. In the end, prosecutors proposed a deal: they would drop the charges against Smollett if he was willing to relinquish his $10,000 bond and carry out community service.

Despite strong public backlash, the District Attorney faced accusations of bias, leading to a reopening of the case that had previously been dropped. The new prosecutor claimed Smollett orchestrated the attack himself due to dissatisfaction with the TV studio’s handling of hate mail he received. Subsequently, a grand jury convicted Smollett on six counts of lying to police about the fabricated incident. In November 2021, he was found guilty of five out of the six charges. He served six days in prison for a five-month sentence before being released on appeal in 2022.

On Thursday, Justice Elizabeth M. Rochford of the Illinois State Supreme Court ruled that the special prosecutor’s case against Smollett infringed upon his constitutional rights.

Nenye Uche, who led Smollett’s defense team, expressed his gratitude for his client’s legal win. 

He stated this case wasn’t about facts, but rather it seemed vengeful and unjust, which has no business in our legal system. In a statement following the verdict, he expressed relief as justice prevailed. We are grateful to the Supreme Court of Illinois for reinstating fairness in the state’s criminal law decisions.

Read More

Sorry. No data so far.

2024-11-21 22:24