After ‘Wicked’, You Should Give the Unofficial ‘Wizard of Oz’ Sequel a Shot

After 'Wicked', You Should Give the Unofficial 'Wizard of Oz' Sequel a Shot

Quick Links

  • ‘Return to Oz’ Is a Bizarrely Delightful Dark Fantasy
  • ‘Return to Oz’ Becomes an ’80 Cult Classic
  • Hollywood Can’t Get Enough of the Timeless Tale

As a film enthusiast who’s seen my fair share of adaptations and sequels, I must say that “Return to Oz” is a hidden gem that deserves more recognition than it got back in the day. Having grown up watching classic films like “The Wizard of Oz“, I was initially skeptical about this darker, edgier take on the beloved tale. But let me tell you, my dear reader, after giving it a chance, I found myself utterly captivated by its strange and delightfully peculiar charm.


With moviegoers worldwide buzzing about the grand premiere of the enchanting musical “Wicked”, many are still thrilled by the excitement surrounding the high-profile adaptation. For those who wish to continue the fun and magic, there’s a wealth of past Hollywood adaptations to binge-watch and savor, either as preparation or as an afterglow to this sensational production.

1985 marked the release of a less conventionally understood film adaptation of L. Frank Baum’s beloved novels, “The Wonderful Land of Oz,” featuring Fairuza Balk in the timeless role of Dorothy Gale in “Back to Oz“. This dark fantasy follows sleep-deprived Dorothy as she embarks on another journey to Oz to rescue her cherished companions and the citizens of Emerald City, who are threatened by the malevolent Nome King and Princess Mombi after their destructive rampage through the magical realm.

‘Return to Oz’ Is a Bizarrely Delightful Dark Fantasy

After 'Wicked', You Should Give the Unofficial 'Wizard of Oz' Sequel a ShotAfter 'Wicked', You Should Give the Unofficial 'Wizard of Oz' Sequel a ShotAfter 'Wicked', You Should Give the Unofficial 'Wizard of Oz' Sequel a Shot

Return to Oz, released in 1985, serves as an unofficial sequel to the legendary 1939 film masterpiece, and offers a captivating, oddly enchanting continuation of the beloved tale. This time around, we follow Dorothy (played by Fairuza Balk) as she gets swept away once more to the magical realm of Oz. After being sent to a sanatorium due to her persistent fascination with this fantastical world by Aunt Em and Uncle Henry, Dorothy unexpectedly finds herself in the shattered remains of Emerald City.

In a shocking turn of events, Dorothy uncovers that the malicious Nome King and his cunning sidekick, Princess Mombi, have seized control over Oz. As a result, they’ve transformed its residents, including her cherished companions like the Cowardly Lion and Tin Man, into stone statues. Upon hearing that Scarecrow is in captivity under their oppressive rule, Dorothy teams up with her comrades Tik-Tok, Billina, Gump, and Jack the Pumpkinhead to reclaim Oz’s charm and restore tranquility among its inhabitants. Throughout this grand adventure, Dorothy will need to trust her intuition and kindness as she confronts powerful enemies and deceitful opponents in her quest for victory.

‘Return to Oz’ Becomes an ’80 Cult Classic

After 'Wicked', You Should Give the Unofficial 'Wizard of Oz' Sequel a ShotAfter 'Wicked', You Should Give the Unofficial 'Wizard of Oz' Sequel a ShotAfter 'Wicked', You Should Give the Unofficial 'Wizard of Oz' Sequel a Shot

Initially released in 1985, the musical film Return to Oz, similar to its predecessor The Wiz (1978), was met with disappointing results. It struggled both critically and commercially, earning only $11.1 million against a production budget of $28 million. Many viewers found the film’s content and overall tone to be overly dark and edgy for younger audiences, feeling that it failed to recreate the charm and magic of the original. Critics labeled the unofficial sequel as “bleak,” “creepy,” and even “occasionally terrifying.” Some even went so far as to call it a “horror show disguised as family entertainment.

Despite initially being met with a cool response by moviegoers, the movie “Return to Oz” has since gained renewed admiration for staying true to L. Frank Baum’s fantasy novels. Those who can distinguish it from “The Wizard of Oz” and appreciate it as a unique creation may find its strange yet charming qualities appealing. As Empire Magazine noted in hindsight, the film effectively captures the whimsical spirit of the original source material.

Each film stands on its own, with no shared themes except for sharing the same origin story. One is a timeless classic, while the other offers a compelling picaresque narrative along with intriguing fabrication.

The polarizing picture marked Balk’s first silver-screen role, and she beat out over 1,000 children to portray Dorothy, with the talented actress and iconic “goth girl” going on to appear in popular movies like The Craft, American History X, The Waterboy, and Almost Famous. When asked to compare Return to Oz to its iconic predecessor, the then 11-year-old Balk said, “It’s a different story and a different picture, and I didn’t try to copy anything Judy Garland did. It’s not that much scarier, but it isn’t as bright.”

Hollywood Can’t Get Enough of the Timeless Tale

After 'Wicked', You Should Give the Unofficial 'Wizard of Oz' Sequel a ShotAfter 'Wicked', You Should Give the Unofficial 'Wizard of Oz' Sequel a ShotAfter 'Wicked', You Should Give the Unofficial 'Wizard of Oz' Sequel a Shot

Despite not appealing to everyone’s taste, Return to Oz effectively paid tribute to both the 1939 classic and acclaimed books, as it showcases unique characters, vivid imagery, and an engaging narrative that continues to captivate audiences almost four decades on. The silver screen can’t resist adapting this timeless story, with the upcoming musical Wicked starring Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande promising another captivating retelling, boasting memorable songs and stunning performances that are sure to enchant audiences.

Read More

Sorry. No data so far.

2024-11-25 03:32