US Congress May Doom Altcoins: The Stablecoin Catastrophe No One Saw Coming!

by

Ah, dear reader, once more civilization finds itself on the edge of a precipice, peering into the abyss of legislative inaction—or, as Bitwise’s own Matt Hougan calls it, “business as usual.” Surely, Washington’s taste for suspense rivals a Dostoevskian gambling den, with the fate of altcoins dangling—like a thief—over the Seine. The Senate prepares to debate the GENIUS Act, and somewhere in the shadows, an ICO scammer giggles nervously.

Altcoins, Stablecoins, and the Legislative Opera 🎭

The disciple Hougan utters apocalyptic warnings of “a long summer for non-bitcoin crypto assets” should nothing be done—visions of sweating programmers gnawing their knuckles while speculators count Satoshis, not sheep. Bitcoin continues to puff out its chest in the café, enjoying the embrace of bankers and politicians; meanwhile, altcoins are left shivering outside, faces pressed to the frosted window, longing for some regulatory warmth.

Stablecoins! They are the crumbling foundation, the Dostoevskian underground man’s only reliable friend—until, suddenly, they might not be. Without sturdy rules and the legitimization of institutions, watch as Wall Street’s slick traders evaporate like dew after a fevered Russian night, taking their liquidity (and their wry tweets) with them. The SEC, solemn as a provincial magistrate, stands ready to close the doors on any whiff of ambiguity. The altcoins? They become mere ghosts, haunting the empty husks of trading apps.

Picture the plot: The GENIUS Act, a grand experiment in bipartisan harmony, collapses into bitter reversal. At first there was solidarity—Democrats and Republicans arm-in-arm, singing “Kumbaya.” But, as traditions dictate, a few betrayals here, a twist of ideology there, and suddenly nine Democrats bolt, four of them switching sides like bored Dostoevsky characters changing their philosophies mid-novel. The vote? Set for May 26. But who among us has faith in the calendar, when the soul is so unpredictable?

Altcoin investors watch, disillusioned but unable to look away. “Will institutional money ever return?” they ask, gazing into their MetaMask wallets with existential dread and a flicker of hope no larger than a satoshi. Without law, there is only rumor, only chaos, and…well, Coinbase’s CEO shaking his fist at Capitol Hill like a beleaguered Raskolnikov.

Clouds Parting? Or Merely a Hallucination? ☁️🙃

Still, Hougan dares to hint at optimism—a reckless move! The cryptocurrency space has seen actual positives, or at least the appearance thereof. The President, perhaps seduced by the philosophical pageantry of digital assets, amasses a bitcoin reserve. America, land of the free, now counts 200,000 BTC in its state coffers—a number as fantastic as any Dostoevsky anecdote. The White House utters “digital assets” and visions of a new utopia swirl through the heads of hopeful speculators. The SEC, perhaps feeling magnanimous (or merely tired), pulls back on accounting rules, letting banks gingerly tiptoe into the wild, unregulated cryptoscape.

If stablecoin and market structure legislation grind to a halt in DC, it’s going to be a long summer for non-bitcoin crypto assets.

— Matt Hougan (@Matt_Hougan) May 6, 2025

But let’s not lose ourselves entirely to hope! Hougan wagers on new all-time highs, dreams of Bitcoin at $200,000, but even he glances nervously at the roulette wheel of legislation. All progress has been by presidential whim rather than law; and, as any reader of Russian literature knows, the whims of the powerful are capricious indeed. Today’s “national priority” is tomorrow’s forgotten cause, abandoned for a good scandal or a particularly amusing meme.

Stablecoin regulations, should they pass, may bring order to the circus, summoning institutional maestros to the center ring. Without them, we are left with shadows, indecision, and—naturally—a touch of melancholy. What is crypto if not a Dostoevskian search for meaning, conducted via pseudonyms, memes, and the eternal longing for validation by the powers that be?

Read More

2025-05-06 22:59