In the Bombay High Court‘s view, while it may be impossible to achieve absolute justice, fairness should always serve as the benchmark. The court affirmed a compensation amount of 62 lakh rupees granted to the family of an employee connected with Shah Rukh Khan’s production company, who tragically passed away from injuries sustained in a hit-and-run accident.
On May 9th, a two-member panel made up of Justices Girish Kulkarni and Advait Sethna declared that they found no errors or inconsistencies in an earlier ruling issued by the tribunal on November 2020. As a result, they chose not to reverse this decision.
In simpler terms, the Bombay High Court emphasized that the Motor Vehicles Act was designed primarily for public welfare. They also highlighted that it’s essential for courts to respect the fundamental right to live with dignity, as guaranteed by Article 21 of our Constitution.
Quoting a previous Supreme Court ruling, the judges underscored that though no monetary amount can fully compensate for a life lost, it’s essential to provide damages as a means of addressing the injury sustained fairly. The court reaffirmed that attaining perfect compensation might be unattainable, but pursuing a fair and reasonable one should always be the goal.
In this particular case, the court validated the grant of 62 lakh rupees to the relatives of Charu Khandal, an animator employed by Shah Rukh Khan’s Red Chillies Entertainment, who passed away following severe injuries in a hit-and-run accident. The judges stated that this compensation was the least appropriate action to ensure justice was served.
In a poignant and sorrowful portrayal, the Bombay High Court labeled the incident as a deeply moving narrative about a promising, skilled individual whose life was prematurely ended in a devastating accident, resulting in her unfortunate demise at an early age.
In 2017, Charu Khandal, an animator who played a key role in the VFX of Shah Rukh Khan’s film Ra.One, sadly passed away. This tragedy occurred five years after she experienced devastating spinal injuries in a road accident in 2012. In that incident, a high-speed car collided with the autorickshaw she was riding in, leaving her unable to move from the neck down. She was just 28 at the time and had been attending a party celebrating her team’s award win.
After the unfortunate accident occurred, her relatives submitted a claim for compensation to the Motor Accident Compensation Court back in June 2014. Then, in November 2020, they were granted approximately 62 hundred thousand rupees as compensation by the court.
As a devoted fan, I must express my thoughts about an intriguing turn of events involving Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. Initially, a ruling suggested a connection between the accident and Khandal’s unfortunate demise, which took place more than four years after the incident. However, the insurance company disputed this finding, positing that no clear link could be established between the accident and her passing.
Additionally, they asserted that the tribunal had erred in attributing her death to quadriplegia, a condition she suffered from as a result of the accident. This is an interesting twist, isn’t it? I can’t wait to see how this unfolds further!
The High Court unequivocally dismissed these points, making it clear that her passing was due to septicaemia, a complication directly linked to the injury that left her quadriplegic. Moreover, the court acknowledged the significant sum of Rs 18 lakhs that the family had expended on her medical care and support.
The judges pointed out that scrutinizing each bill to the very last penny in a case like this, where prolonged suffering and eventual death were involved, would be an unjust and excessively strict application of the law. They underscored that Khandal’s condition necessitated ongoing care, such as an assistant and physical therapy, for five years following the accident.
As a relentless admirer of justice, I can’t help but express my indignation at the insurance company’s underhand tactic of employing overly technical jargon to dodge their responsibilities. It’s simply unacceptable that such maneuvers are used to deprive a victim’s family of their rightful recompense. The court made it clear: such deceit should never stand in the way of justice being served.
Read More
- CRK Boss Rush guide – Best cookies for each stage of the event
- Ludus promo codes (April 2025)
- Mini Heroes Magic Throne tier list
- DEEP PREDICTION. DEEP cryptocurrency
- Summoners Kingdom: Goddess tier list and a reroll guide
- CXT PREDICTION. CXT cryptocurrency
- Castle Duels tier list – Best Legendary and Epic cards
- Maiden Academy tier list
- Adriana Lima Reveals Her Surprising Red Carpet Secrets for Cannes 2025
- Kingdom Rush 5: Alliance tier list – Every hero and tower ranked
2025-05-13 18:23