As someone who has spent countless hours navigating dark corridors and outsmarting enemies as Sam Fisher, I cannot help but feel a deep sense of disappointment at the cancellation of the Splinter Cell movie. Having grown up with the franchise, I have witnessed its evolution from humble beginnings to a complex and engaging series that captured the hearts of millions.
Fans of the game Splinter Cell may find themselves even more disheartened, as any hopes for a movie adaptation appear to be dashed. The producer Basil Iwanyk, who has been involved with the project for much of the past decade, has effectively squashed any prospects of a film. Despite the involvement of Tom Clancy’s branding, and the addition of Oscar-nominated writer Sheldon Turner and director Doug Liman (renowned for The Bourne Identity), the Splinter Cell movie seemed poised for release in the near future.
Approximately a decade ago, the director at that time, Liman, enthusiastically sketched out what seemed like the foundation for a broader series. The first film served as an introduction to the backstory of Fisher and possibly how he encountered his partner and sidekick, Irving Lambert. Sam Fisher, an elite trouble-shooter from the NSA, was initially given voice by experienced action movie character actor Michael Ironside. To bring this character to life on screen, a rough-edged actor with a gravelly voice and suitable physique was sought. In 2013, there were rumors that Tom Hardy would portray secret agent Sam Fisher. Regrettably, it seemed that Fisher’s night vision goggles were doomed.
The highly anticipated Sam Fisher project we initially shared news about in 2014 aligned with Ubisoft’s rapid rise in the gaming industry and foray into cinema. However, the latest update on this project is significant as it emerges during a challenging period for Ubisoft, marked by years of mismanagement, creative stagnation, and tarnished public image that has significantly impacted their game portfolio. Lacking solid proof to the contrary, the intriguing idea seems to have suffered not from its own flaws, but rather from shifting market trends and a license holder that failed to capitalize on opportunities.
Banking on a Pre-Built Media Franchise
As a movie critic looking back, I must admit my anticipation for the long-awaited New Regency Productions/Ubisoft collaboration, originally brewing in rumors over a decade ago, has sadly come to an end. This project was spawned from the widespread appeal of author Tom Clancy, whose works revolving around Jack Ryan had already inspired numerous films like “Hunt for Red October,” “Patriot Games,” and “The Sum of All Fears.
Initially, having Tom Hardy on board suggested that the film could overcome its long-term development troubles. However, according to Iwanyk, the script proved too intricate and demanding for a satisfactory execution. At the time of writing, specific reasons behind its sudden cancellation after years in production remained undisclosed, but Iwanyk implied that they struggled to secure a substantial budget needed to create a film worthy of the source material.
The production for this movie started around the same period as the “Assassin’s Creed” film featuring Michael Fassbender, which was a cinematic interpretation of the Ubisoft game series, and wasn’t well-received by either fans or critics. Its sequels were also unexpectedly scrapped. This potentially marked the beginning of the end for the big-screen adaptation of Splinter Cell, although the unpredictable economics of creating blockbusters has made things more complicated.
Assembling the Building Blocks of a Cinematic Universe
Skilled in undercover work, hidden intelligence operations, and covert monitoring, the Fisher character, patterned after the protagonist from the Metal Gear Solid series, is quite recognizable. Ironside’s subtle humor added an air of world-weariness and a touch of nihilism to his portrayal, transforming a typical, run-of-the-mill secret agent into one of the most adored characters of that gaming era. The gameplay focused on stealth rather than killing everyone in sight. In essence, Splinter Cell can be seen as a playable adaptation of the Mission: Impossible movies. Interestingly enough, the Mission: Impossible films share a composer with the Splinter Cell games.
Although Fisher’s methods may echo the spy genre, his tactics are more reminiscent of Batman, leaping from shadows to knock out enemies, utilizing advanced equipment for intelligence gathering and neutralization without leaving a trace. The somber atmosphere of the melodrama is occasionally lightened by Fisher’s dark humor and AI adversaries who were prone to getting stuck on doors or falling off ladders. Interestingly, these games had an underlying satirical tone, as the developers expressed disdain for Clancy’s style and political views. As they stated to NME in 2023, “The more tropes we included, the more it resembled Clancy.” Nonetheless, the formula proved successful.
For longtime enthusiasts, there was much anticipation due to the abundance of material from six main games (depending on how one counts them) for storytelling. The complex spy-themed series, reminiscent of Clancy’s “airport novels,” seemed ripe for live adaptation, following in the footsteps of Clancy’s earlier work, Jack Ryan. Later installments, less favored by fans, featured Fisher engaging in undercover prison operations, hunting Electromagnetic Pulses (EMPs), and uncovering his deceased daughter’s faked death, all while evading typical terrorist elements. With exceptional voice acting, a Grammy-winning composer Lalo Schifrin providing the music, and an over-the-top yet realistic spy ambiance, the games exuded a cinematic polish that seemed destined for the big screen… or so it appeared.
The Real Reason(s) Why the Wheels Come Off the Splinter Cell Movie
As a movie critic looking back, it’s clear that the decision to shelve the upcoming Splinter Cell film feels like Ubisoft is letting go of a character who hasn’t had his own game in over a decade. For today’s younger audience, or ‘Zoomers’, this character might as well be a stranger, making marketing a challenge. Yet, the Splinter Cell franchise has proven its adaptability with multiple novelizations, suggesting that it could still find success in a different form.
Just wanted to mention, the “Minecraft” film is yet to hit screens, despite some puzzlement about its intended audience and purpose. Unfortunately, Yves Guillemot, the Ubisoft Chairman/CEO, decided to postpone the “Splinter Cell” project, but he emphasized to journalists that the Tom Clancy character is not being abandoned as they explore new trends – according to IGN.
I may not be able to divulge much right now, but rest assured, all the Tom Clancy games are being attended to diligently. Our team is currently juggling quite a few tasks, but fret not, Splinter Cell is definitely on our radar and progressing smoothly.
Seven years have passed since that statement was made, and it seems they overlooked Splinter Cell in the process. It’s no wonder that Guillemot is under scrutiny, with the company potentially being bought by a Chinese tech giant, tarnishing its reputation within the industry. Another possible factor behind the movie’s cancellation might be the upcoming Metal Gear Solid film, which boasts a more popular IP and could overshadow everything else.
Another concerning scenario arises from the post-production phase of “Watchdogs,” which was adapted this past summer and has so far generated minimal buzz. Ubisoft and their Hollywood collaborators are likely fretting about the film’s potential profitability, given the stiff competition from movies like “The Super Mario Bros. Movie” and “Borderlands.” With their stock in a slump, Ubisoft can’t afford to take any risks. Fans may find some comfort in Netflix’s upcoming animated series “Splinter Cell: Deathwatch,” set to air next year.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-12-02 00:03