Does Beetlejuice 2 Live Up to the Original?

Does Beetlejuice 2 Live Up to the Original?

As a die-hard fan of Tim Burton’s eccentric and enchanting universe, I eagerly anticipated the release of “Beetlejuice Beetlejuice.” Having grown up with the original 1988 classic and cherishing its quirky charm, I approached this sequel with a mix of excitement and apprehension.


36 years ago, on March 30, 1988, Tim Burton’s movie “Beetlejuice” premiered in theaters. In this film, Michael Keaton played the main character, a bio-exorcist, with Alec Baldwin and Geena Davis portraying a married couple who hired him. The movie also introduced Winona Ryder to the world as Lydia Deetz, an iconic role. At that time, “Beetlejuice” was only the second film Tim Burton had directed, following “Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure” in 1985. It was this movie that significantly boosted Burton’s popularity.

Beetlejuice, originally, played a crucial role in shaping Tim Burton’s unique style, and ever since its debut, it has become a cherished cult film. It’s a movie that generations have enjoyed, passing it down from parents to their children. For numerous individuals, it’s an annual tradition to re-watch this film during Halloween. Given the upcoming sequel this Halloween season, the timing couldn’t be more fitting. However, the question remains: Can this eagerly anticipated sequel match the charm of the original?

What Challenges Does the Sequel Face?

As a film enthusiast, I can’t help but marvel at the enduring appeal of Tim Burton’s first masterpiece, “Beetlejuice.” The movie’s ingenious blend of practical effects, mesmerizing stop-motion animation, and exceptional performances from both leads and supporting actors has ensured its timelessness. It’s no surprise that this film remains an intensely loved staple among Burton fans. Forty years after its initial release, its status as a cult classic is unquestionable, solidified by the dedication of its ever-loyal fan base.

Any sequel, reboot, or continuation of a popular property often faces a degree of apprehension and criticism, and that’s certainly true for the case of Beetlejuice. Some fans view the creation of a sequel to such an influential film in their childhood as an unwelcome intrusion, and for them, it seems almost impossible for the sequel to win their favor. However, most reactions seen online through articles and early reviews suggest a more nuanced stance – a mix of skepticism tempered with a glimmer of hope and eagerness.

As a passionate film enthusiast, I must admit that I’ve found myself questioning the approach taken by the sequel film when it comes to its reliance on CGI and lesser practical effects. This shift has stirred concerns among many fans of the original, who worry about the movie’s ability to recapture the enchanting look and feel that made the first film a classic. The volume of this critique has only grown louder after the release and success of Alien: Romulus, a movie that beautifully demonstrates the power of well-executed practical effects. Alien: Romulus also serves as a testament to the value of a director’s commitment to authenticity and staying true to the original aesthetic of a cherished franchise.

Despite the widespread use of computer-generated imagery (CGI) in modern films, some viewers yearn for a resurgence of traditional and tangible special effects, particularly in remakes and continuations of series that originated before CGI was an option. This sentiment appears to be particularly relevant when discussing the potential quality of the Beetlejuice sequel compared to its predecessor. Nevertheless, it seems that the absence of practical effects may not deter audiences from watching and even appreciating this follow-up film.

New and Returning Cast Members Blend Seamlessly

Does Beetlejuice 2 Live Up to the Original?Does Beetlejuice 2 Live Up to the Original?Does Beetlejuice 2 Live Up to the Original?Does Beetlejuice 2 Live Up to the Original?

Instead of many modern sequels that have been criticized for their quality, this movie has generated excitement due to its compelling trailers, smart marketing, and the involvement of the original director as well as Catherine O’Hara, Winona Ryder, and Michael Keaton. Additionally, Jenna Ortega, a rising star in Tim Burton productions, is joining the cast as Lydia Deetz’s daughter, which adds to the anticipation surrounding the film.

This sequel doesn’t fail to impress, with outstanding acting performances by both old and new cast members. Ortega skillfully portrays Astrid, offering a balanced counterpoint to Lydia Deetz’s supernatural beliefs, while Willem Defoe brings humor as a former actor playing a ghostly police officer. Remarkably, the characters seamlessly blend with the original cast, as if they had always been part of the Beetlejuice universe. The returning actors, including O’Hara, Ryder, and Keaton, flawlessly reprise their roles, making it seem like they never left these characters, as if three decades haven’t passed since the last film.

Beetlejuice 2‘s Writing Retains the Original’s Charm

Does Beetlejuice 2 Live Up to the Original?

Similar to many sequels, especially those produced years after the original, there’s a common feeling among critics and fans that it’s challenging for the upcoming film to rekindle the precise enchantment and allure of the original. After all, recapturing the magic of a movie that is deeply cherished and nostalgically adored by viewers is nearly impossible. However, the sequel has been praised in early reviews as an enjoyable and thrilling continuation of the beloved first film, even though it may not possess the late ’80s charm of Beetlejuice. Nevertheless, it seems plausible that it will become a classic on its own merits; a new Beetlejuice for a new audience to embrace.

This new addition to the Beetlejuice series maintains the same biting, clever, and eerily charming wit as the initial film. The humor and intelligent writing seem like a reaffirmation of Burton’s style, making this film a standout in his collection of work. The vibrant and eccentric afterlife setting, coupled with the Netherworld’s set design inspired by German Expressionism, will resonate with fans as a nod to the unique aesthetic that the first Beetlejuice helped introduce.

Modern Special Effects Aren’t Always Better

Does Beetlejuice 2 Live Up to the Original?

Although advanced CGI might have given the new film a sleeker appearance, removing some of the quirks from the original’s claymation, stop-motion, and body horror effects, it still retains a sense of familiarity for viewers. In other words, despite appearing more polished, some fans may argue that the sequel lacks the raw charm of the original due to its use of modern special effects. However, the passion and devotion evident in this new film make it feel like a genuine continuation of the first movie’s legacy.

Furthermore, unlike the flamboyant Beetlejuice from the 1988 film, Keaton’s portrayal in this movie might appear more toned down. However, he skillfully retains the captivating charm that initially won audiences over, making this film a delightful addition to the franchise for fans of the original Beetlejuice movie. Although it may not reach the iconic status or cult classic acclaim of its predecessor, it remains a worthy watch for those who appreciate the first Beetlejuice film.

A Critical and Commercial Success

Does Beetlejuice 2 Live Up to the Original?

At present, the second installment boasts an impressive 77% rating from critics on RottenTomatoes, which is only 5% lower than the initial movie. Similarly, it has an audience score of 81%, barely missing the original by a percentage point. Although it’s uncertain if and how these scores may fluctuate as more viewers share their reviews, the favorable feedback and positive reception since its premiere have provided a promising foundation for Beetlejuice 2. The early acclaim from critics and audience enthusiasm towards this sequel have given it an opportunity that many sequels and new entries in cult film franchises rarely receive – the chance to establish its own identity and demonstrate its value as both a standalone film and a worthy successor to a cherished classic.

Read More

2024-09-19 04:01