Experience a New Film Every Time: The Revolutionary Story of ‘Eno’

by

As a fervent admirer, I can confidently say that I am captivated by the groundbreaking contributions made by Brian Eno in the realm of popular music. Kicking off my journey in the early ’70s as the keyboardist for Roxy Music, this visionary has since catapulted himself into an iconic figure, recognized globally for his pioneering work. His solo adventures have significantly impacted the birth and evolution of electronica and ambient music. Moreover, his production prowess has graced the albums of legendary artists such as David Bowie, U2, Talking Heads, Peter Gabriel, and Coldplay.

In an unexpected fashion, reflecting Eno’s avant-garde and technology-oriented style in music production, a fresh documentary about him, titled Eno (2024), stands out as an innovative piece itself. This groundbreaking work, directed by Gary Hustwit, employs cutting-edge generative software that varies the combination of Hustwit’s interviews with Eno and archival footage during each screening, ensuring no two viewings are alike. This unique approach offers a fresh and exclusive cinematic experience, aiming to stimulate and inspire future filmmakers.

Billions of Movies in One

In an interview with The Verge, Hustwit shared that the concept of ‘Eno‘ was birthed from his ambition to create a movie whose content could change with each viewing, reflecting the transition of filmmaking from physical reels to digital formats. He referred to this innovative film style as a natural progression, stating, “This film is never truly finished; we can continually add elements, enhance the diversity, observe the combinations, and keep developing it.” Hustwit believed that Brian Eno, who provided the soundtrack for Hustwit’s 2018 documentary ‘Rams,’ would be an ideal fit for this method due to his own history of generative exploration in his avant-garde music career. Initially reluctant about being featured in a documentary, Eno eventually agreed to Hustwit’s project upon seeing a demonstration of the software that would power the film’s unique, ever-evolving nature.

Hustwit and his buddy, digital artist and coder Brendan Dawes, named their generative software system “Brain One,” which is an anagram for Brian Eno. This software selects at random from a collection of more than 30 hours of interviews and over 500 hours of archival footage belonging to Eno, displaying the selection on the screen. As stated by The New York Times, this means there are approximately 52 quintillion (or 52 billion billion) unique combinations of this film, making it highly improbable for anyone to witness the same sequence twice. Moreover, Hustwit and Dawes collaborated with Swedish tech firm Teenage Engineering to develop a hardware system called Brain One, intended for theater screenings, that also employs the same random algorithm.

Occasionally, the content disparity between screenings is so immense that certain critics remarked they seemed to have watched distinct films instead of varying presentations of the same one. For instance, Alissa Wilkinson from The New York Times noted the stark contrast between her two viewings: “In the initial screening I attended, a significant portion delved into how pop musicians such as Eno and many of his collaborators – like David Bowie and Talking Heads – construct and portray an identity during performance, integrating that persona into their medium. […] The second screening focused more on the importance of boundary-pushing and attempting unconventional experiments (such as those embodied in Eno’s ‘Oblique Strategies’) deck…

The Creative Potential of Generative Art (Not Artifical Intelligence)

When referring to Eno, the term “generative” might conjure up unfavorable connotations related to AI and the rehashing (or plagiarism) of pre-existing content. However, it’s crucial to clarify that the technology behind Eno is distinct from generative AI as we commonly understand it. To put it simply, generative AI systems like ChatGPT or Midjourney are taught on existing works, which can then generate outputs that are inherently based on those original works. In contrast, code-based generative art employs rules written by a human to create something entirely new. Moreover, Hustwit underscores the fact that there was no content theft in the making of the film, as the dataset used is exclusively their own material and not sourced from other people’s documentaries.

Indeed, Hustwit and Dawes find tremendous promise in the emerging cinematic approach they pioneered for Eno. To underscore this, during the making of Eno, they established a film production company called Anamorph. This venture’s primary objective is to delve into the capabilities of generative technology across various types of films and genres, not restricting themselves to documentaries alone. Hustwit shared with TechCrunch his conviction that generative films could be a lifesaver for the movie theater industry: “In the current state, theaters are in desperate need of a reason to attract audiences, and if there is an allure associated with the one-of-a-kind live cinema experience, that could potentially be achieved.

‘Eno’ the Film and Eno the Man

As a cinephile, I’m thrilled about the emergence of generative filmmaking, although it’s yet to fully permeate mainstream cinema. The backing of a titan like Brian Eno, a towering figure in modern music, gives it a significant boost and undeniably attracts attention. Even if it doesn’t become standard practice, the innovative spirit that defines Eno serves as a testament to one of the most impactful figures in contemporary music today.

Read More

2025-04-06 23:32