Historian Rates the Accuracy of Some of the Best Movies About Presidents

by

As a history buff who’s spent countless hours poring over dusty old books and sifting through archives, I can say with confidence that History Hit’s latest Deep Dive into presidential movies is a must-watch for any film enthusiast with a passion for America’s past. The way Dan Snow dissects the historical accuracy of these films, from Lincoln to Oppenheimer, is like having a personal tour guide through the annals of time.

History Hit has unveiled a fresh video on their YouTube channel within the Deep Dive collection; this time, it delves into the subject of presidential films. In anticipation of the 2024 U.S. presidential election, Historian Dan Snow scrutinizes the authenticity of movies portraying the President of the United States. He examines how Hollywood recalls presidents and influential political figures from past eras. History Hit provides a variety of series, documentaries, and podcasts featuring esteemed historians from around the world. You can find the entire video below for viewing.

Since 2012’s movie “Lincoln,” Dan verifies that it accurately portrays Lincoln visiting battlefields, conversing with soldiers and commanders during the ongoing Civil War. He even interacted with wounded Confederate rebels in hospitals. The film also highlights the unfair wage gap between African-American soldiers in the Union Army and their white counterparts, a disparity rectified by 1864 when they started receiving equal pay. Additionally, Snow praises the inclusion of extensive debates about the 13th Amendment in the script, providing a political backdrop for viewers.

As a movie critic, I was thoroughly impressed by the meticulous portrayal of Abraham Lincoln’s eloquent words, speeches, and unique knack for employing analogies in this cinematic masterpiece. The script subtly acknowledged Lincoln’s humble origins and his towering stature, as recorded in 19th-century photography, which added authenticity to the film. The filmmakers appear to have successfully encapsulated the spirit and ideologies of our 16th U.S. President. Daniel Day-Lewis, an Oscar-winning actor, delivers a compelling performance as Abraham Lincoln. His choice of projects that strive for authenticity, backed by historical sources such as photographs, speeches, and firsthand accounts, makes him a favorite among film enthusiasts like myself. MovieWeb also ranks this film among the top movies depicting American Presidents.

U.S. Presidents As Seen By Hollywood

In this analysis, Dan reviews several movies, such as the upcoming film “Oppenheimer” (2023), along with “Thirteen Days” (2000), “All The Way” (2016), “Frost/Nixon” (2008), and “Vice” (2018). Christopher Nolan’s hit summer blockbuster, “Oppenheimer,” features Cillian Murphy as the creator of the atomic bomb and Gary Oldman portraying Harry S. Truman, the 33rd U.S. President. Delving into the pivotal Oval Office meeting between Truman and the physicist in 1945, Dan dissects Truman’s surprising ascent to the presidency and his stance following the use of the bomb. The movie “Thirteen Days” centers on John F. Kennedy’s management of the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962. This period is often considered the zenith of his Presidency, as tragically, less than a year later, President John F. Kennedy was assassinated. Dan offers astute analysis to shed light on Kennedy’s background with war and his thought process before engaging in conflict with the Russians and Cuba.

The movie “All the Way,” starring Bryan Cranston, shows Lyndon B. Johnson’s efforts to pass the Civil Rights Bill through the U.S. Senate and his handling of the Vietnam situation. The film emphasizes L.B.J.’s ability to get into the details, lobby, negotiate, and persuade senators to support his legislation. Snow also appreciates Cranston’s portrayal of L.B.J.’s imposing presence. Later, Dan discusses the depiction of Vice-President Dick Cheney’s influence over President Bush in the movies “Frost/Nixon” and Adam McKay’s “Vice.” He points out that director McKay uses visuals to illustrate political maneuvering and power struggles, but believes that Cheney is portrayed as a villain too heavily in the film, with Bush taking less responsibility historically.

In my opinion, nailing down a compelling historical film boils down to the finer points. Whether it’s the dialogue, setting, or character development, creative adjustments are inevitable – sometimes out of necessity, other times by choice. It’s all about weaving in an authentic historical context, showcasing the motivations and passions that drove key figures through their actions or visual storytelling, and ensuring performances feel genuine.

Read More

2024-12-25 23:32