How Clint Eastwood’s Relationship with Warner Bros. Unraveled

by

Quick Links

  • Clint Eastwood Was Owed a Wide Theatrical Release for ‘Juror #2’
  • ‘Juror #2’ Was Punished for the Box-Office Failure of ‘Cry Macho’
  • Eastwood Is Hollywood’s Last Studio Star

As a dedicated cinephile, I’d like to share a bit of behind-the-scenes trivia about the legendary Clint Eastwood. His directorial journey in the world of cinema began with the gripping 1971 thriller “Play Misty for Me,” which was proudly distributed by Universal Pictures. Interestingly, his production company, Malpaso Productions, found a home at Universal until 1975. However, following some disagreements over the handling of his 1975 thriller film “The Eiger Sanction,” I, Clint Eastwood, decided to make a move and joined forces with Warner Bros., where I’ve continued my cinematic journey ever since.

Spanning around 45 movies over a period of 50 years, Clint Eastwood’s extraordinary association with Warner Bros. has generated over $3.5 billion in unadjusted box-office earnings, plus billions more through additional income streams, and earned him two Best Picture Oscars. Given Eastwood’s unprecedented reputation as the most accomplished director, producer, and actor in Warner Bros.’ history, it was anticipated that his latest film, the legal thriller “Juror #2“, would be promoted extravagantly and have a broad cinematic release.

Instead of having a wide theatrical release for Juror #2, Warner Bros. chose to bury the film on their Max streaming service. They gave it a minimal theatrical run in just 35 cinemas, which seemed more like a polite gesture towards Eastwood and an attempt to spark buzz for the Max release. However, despite initially being marketed as an awards-qualifying run, no promotional campaign has been launched, even though Juror #2, with its 92% Rotten Tomatoes rating and 91% audience score, is now considered one of Clint Eastwood’s most praised films in the past three decades.

The strong viewership of “Juror #2” doesn’t change the fact that Eastwood was unfairly treated with it. Essentially, the current management at Warner Bros. quietly released the film without much promotion, clearly signaling that they consider the 94-year-old Eastwood as an anomaly in Hollywood, an outdated artifact rather than a historical figure worthy of protection and respect.

Read Our Review

Clint Eastwood Was Owed a Wide Theatrical Release for ‘Juror #2’

Contrary to rumors suggesting that Warner Bros. had planned to release Juror #2 directly on streaming platforms, the studio has not officially confirmed this plan. It’s interesting to note that this decision is surprising since Clint Eastwood has consistently delivered successful films for Warner Bros., including box-office hits like American Sniper, The Mule, and Sully.

As a die-hard fan of Clint Eastwood’s work, I can’t help but notice that despite some box office flops, like his 2021 Western movie “Cry Macho”, his films have an uncanny ability to thrive beyond the theater. His budget-focused approach and the timeless appeal of his cinematic masterpieces ensure they remain crowd favorites long after their initial release.

The move to withhold a fitting theatrical release for “Juror #2,” potentially Eastwood’s last film, felt like a disrespectful action, reminiscent of the myopia that led to Christopher Nolan leaving Warner Bros. for Universal Pictures. Given the emotional attachment associated with “Juror #2” and the possibility that it would be Eastwood’s farewell movie, there was substantial expectation that cinemagoers, particularly older audiences who are often underserved, would have flocked to see this critically acclaimed film. Made on a budget of approximately $35 million in characteristic Eastwood style, economical and cost-effective.

The way Warner Bros. handled Juror #2, which made over $21 million overseas, was lackluster and symbolic. They chose not to reveal the film’s domestic box office gross, seemingly to avoid embarrassing Clint Eastwood if the performance was poor. In essence, it seems as though Warner Bros. wanted the movie and Mr. Eastwood to fade into obscurity.

‘Juror #2’ Was Punished for the Box-Office Failure of ‘Cry Macho’

The reason behind not having a broad theater release for “Juror #2” was largely due to the poor performance of Clint Eastwood’s last film, “Cry Macho,” released in 2021. This Western movie, which was one of his final starring roles, only made around $10 million at the domestic box office, a relatively low figure compared to his usual earnings. According to The Wall Street Journal, David Zaslav, CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery, criticized the executives who approved “Cry Macho” during a well-known conference call and also questioned Eastwood’s current worth to the studio.

During the conference call, it’s said that Zaslav commented on Eastwood’s substantial association with the studio, stating that no favor debts were owed, evidently alluding to Eastwood. Over the last 50 years, Eastwood has provided more financial and non-financial value to Warner Bros. than any other star has given to a studio in their entire career.

Eastwood Is Hollywood’s Last Studio Star

If Clint Eastwood weren’t a renowned movie actor, he would likely be celebrated for his exceptional work as a filmmaker over the last 50 years. The treatment of Juror #2 by Warner Bros., which seems to undervalue Eastwood, demonstrates that the unique creative autonomy he has had with Warner Bros. during the past five decades is no longer viable in today’s studio system. This system tends to shy away from funding the kind of low-budget dramatic films that Eastwood has excelled in for the last two decades.

In his capacity as Warner Bros.’ representative, he faithfully narrated two documentaries chronicling the studio’s history: “Here’s Looking at You, Warner Bros.” in 2001 and “You Must Remember This: The Warner Bros. Story” in 2008. Interestingly, despite his own experience with “Juror #2,” the titles of these documentaries echo iconic lines from what many consider the studio’s masterpiece, the 1942 romantic drama “Casablanca.” If made today, this classic film would likely be a direct-to-streaming release, and indeed, “Juror #2” is now available on Max.

Read More

2025-01-15 01:31