John Lithgow Tells Cancel Culture Mob to Stuff It

“Oh, heavens no!”

John Lithgow’s response to the persistent inquiries from journalists about his potential role in the upcoming “Harry Potter” series effectively conveys his stance on the matter.

This isn’t 2020 anymore.

I’m thrilled to be stepping into the shoes of the esteemed Albus Dumbledore in the highly anticipated Max series, one of the most buzzed-about productions in Tinseltown. Previously brought to life by the talented Richard Harris and Michael Gambon, this character is a pivotal figure in the magical world of Harry Potter.

Most actors of a certain age would jump at the chance. Lithgow, 79, did just that.

Now, select media outlets are trying to either cancel him or force him to resign. Why?

The series belongs to J.K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter” fictional world, and the writer is significantly influencing it off-stage. Due to Rowling’s controversial comments about certain aspects of the transgender community, she has been labeled Public Enemy number one by many far-left activists and journalists.

But we repeat ourselves.

If this casting announcement had happened in 2020, during the peak of “woke” culture, there’s a possibility that Lithgow might have turned down the part due to sensitivity surrounding the role.

Not today.

Indeed, it was a significant choice as it likely marks my final leading role… It’s an eight-year contract, which made me ponder life’s passage and consider this part as a suitable swan song.

I found myself questioning, ‘What relevance does this have?’ I’m intrigued as to how J.K. Rowling has integrated it into her work. I guess one day I might get the chance to chat with her, and I’m eager to learn more about her perspective.

And, when pressed about reconsidering his decision, he answered, “Oh, heavens no.”

In a show of strong criticism, Deadline.com exclaimed dramatically, immediately positioning its article as a critique of John Lithgow from the outset. This lengthy opening was designed to cast a negative light on the esteemed actor.

Even though J.K. Rowling has faced criticism and rebuke from figures such as Nicola Coughlan, Pedro Pascal, David Tennant, and others, and given the escalation of anti-trans rhetoric from the current administration, John Lithgow is puzzled by how the author’s views influence his choice to play Albus Dumbledore in HBO’s upcoming serialized adaptation of Harry Potter.

And they would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren’t for woke’s sudden, glorious decline.

Lithgow seems to be oblivious to the concept of “Cancel Culture,” as evidenced by his recent remarks advocating for freedom of expression in the arts. However, he’s about to learn more about it now. Notably, unlike some others who have recently faced similar situations, he is not giving in easily.

Lithgow stands firm in supporting Rowling, and the public is on her side. However, one wouldn’t realize this from the media’s pressure on Lithgow to change his mind about the role. This tactic may have worked in the past, but times have changed.

It’s unlikely to change Lithgow’s mind now.

Read More

2025-04-28 22:03