Johnny Depp’s Lawyer Has Some Thoughts About Justin Baldoni’s Legal Strategy: ‘Usually You Would Not Do That’

by

Since Blake Lively first lodged her lawsuit against Justin Baldoni, numerous lawsuits have ensued, revealing a wealth of information that’s been spreading like wildfire. This ongoing It Ends With Us controversy is being likened to the infamous Amber Heard vs. Johnny Depp trial. Now, Baldoni’s legal representative, Ben Chew, has spoken out about Baldoni’s litigation approach, describing it as “bold” and “aggressive,” a tactic not often employed in such cases.

Lawyer Ben Chew was questioned about the updated lawsuit by Baldoni and the website created by the actor’s team on “Law & Crime – Sidebar with Jesse Weber”. The host remarked that he found it courageous to take such an action, and then inquired if this move was a wise decision. In reply, Chew stated:

– Instead of “asked” you could say “questioned” or “interrogated”
– Instead of “the host explained” you could use “the host commented” or “the host observed”
– Instead of “he thought it was a ‘bold’ move” you could say “he found it courageous”
– Instead of “then he asked the lawyer if this move was a good idea” you could say “then he inquired if this move was a wise decision”
– Instead of “In response, Chew said:” you could use “Chew responded by saying:” or simply “Chew replied:

In simpler terms, I concur with your assessment that the action was quite assertive, even bold. It’s not common practice to act so forcefully before a hearing, but considering they would have carefully reviewed the material, it might be justified. Sharing court documents like pleadings, which are public records, seems acceptable. However, when we delve into work product or advocacy pieces, we get closer to pushing boundaries.

Jesse Weber pointed out that sharing such details came shortly after it emerged that Lively and Reynolds were attempting to secure a gag order for Baldoni’s attorney, which he found quite strategic. As mentioned earlier, acting in such a manner seems unusual prior to the start of a hearing.

Reiterating that point, he said:

But, it’s a novel approach, a bold approach.

As a devoted cinema enthusiast, I’d maintain my neutral stance in the ongoing debate about who might emerge victorious in the “It Ends With Us” contest. Nonetheless, it’s fascinating to observe both teams strategically releasing behind-the-scenes footage and audio messages recently, such as Baldoni’s team doing so over the past few weeks to bolster their argument. To echo this tactic, the lawyer elucidated:

In my opinion, utilizing audio and video recordings as evidence is exceptionally compelling because it allows everyone to witness the events directly. This kind of proof carries more weight than mere statements, especially those made by counsel. When it comes to text messages, I believe that putting someone in a situation where they have to clarify what they meant can be detrimental, as the saying goes, “When you’re explaining, you’re losing.” Thus, on either side, having actual recordings or using the exact words of the opposition makes for a successful day.

Indeed, numerous text messages have been employed on both sides of this dispute. Lively’s original grievance was supported by texts aimed at demonstrating that Baldoni had sexually harassed her and orchestrated a smear campaign against her. Subsequently, the director’s lawsuit against the New York Times and his lawsuit against co-star Ryan Reynolds (and his wife) utilized text messages to provide a clear account of events, suggesting that Lively and her team were selectively presenting information.

In summary, the situation is flooded with information and legal disputes from both sides, making it challenging to stay updated. Chew’s remarks suggest a brave strategy by releasing everything, but he also emphasized that utilizing evidence such as audio and video recordings is highly impactful. Now we can only anticipate how this saga unfolds in the courtroom.

Read More

2025-02-06 18:37