‘Jurassic Park’ Waded Into One of the Biggest Scientific Battles

by

In the 1990s, particularly with the debut of “Jurassic Park” and its subsequent sequels, was an exhilarating era for enthusiasts of paleontology. The Steven Spielberg series, adapted from Michael Crichton’s books, ignited a fresh wave of curiosity in the field. Interestingly, many witty references might have been missed by the average viewer, especially during “The Lost World: Jurassic Park” released in 1997. This was one of Spielberg’s subtle jabs at the confrontation between the two leading American paleontologists in the film, a nod to those who closely follow the science world. If you ever doubted that Spielberg lacked respect for science just because it’s a monster movie, think twice.

When Steven Spielberg created the Jurassic Park films, he spared no expense, gathering top-tier and highly esteemed professionals to create a realistic portrayal of long-extinct creatures. However, even these leading experts couldn’t reach a consensus on crucial aspects about the Tyrannosaurus Rex, such as its diet, movement patterns, and physiology. Interestingly, subtle tributes to two prominent dinosaur researchers, Robert Bakker and Jack Horner, can be found in the early films. Their ongoing debate, which was famously dramatized in Jurassic Park and its sequel, has now been preserved for posterity. Kudos if you recognized the joke – your college education certainly paid off!

Any Similarities to Persons, Living or Dead, Are Purely Intentional

Despite some variations from the original sources, both the Spielberg films adhere to the essential facts. When Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park premiered in 1993, Jack Horner and Robert Bakker were two prominent figures in their field during the late ’80s and early ’90s, playing crucial roles in the film’s development. Interestingly, Dr. Alan Grant, portrayed by Sam Neill, was inspired by Jack Horner, while his frequent on-screen rival, characteristically pronounced as “Bocker” (Bakker), appeared in a less flattering role as Dr. Robert Burke in the sequel. It is said that during the production of the sequel, Jack Horner, serving as an advisor, suggested that the grizzled, arrogant paleontologist with a cowboy hat who bore a resemblance to Bakker should be devoured by a T. rex as a tribute.

The Great Dinosaur Debate Spreads to Theaters

When the book was being written, Bakker’s theories about dinosaurs being warm-blooded, caring for babies, and capable of high speeds dominated, particularly the idea that a T. rex possessed the speed necessary for hunting. However, Horner arrived at contrasting findings. In an interview with the Deseret News in 1994, he challenged the name “king lizard tyrant,” stating that the T. rex lacked upper-body strength and its arms were more of a hindrance than helpful. He argued that predators needed their arms to stabilize prey before biting, contrasting this with the agile hunter, the Velociraptor.

Moreover, he argues that T. rex may have possessed an exceptional sense of smell, which is suggested by its skull structure. Animals seeking decaying meat often have large olfactory lobes, and this seems to be the case with T. rex. However, mathematical models published in the journal PeerJ support Horner’s scavenger hypothesis, while the “must go faster” scene is considered fictional. Regretfully, T. rex was probably a slow-moving creature whose anatomy was more similar to that of a large, terrestrial vulture with a correspondingly large appetite.

When Five-Ton Farm Animals Ruled the Planet

The film series, Jurassic Park, was influenced by authentic scientific methods and research, a field Michael Crichton was well-versed in. However, despite having an intelligent team, Spielberg made some errors. Horner attempted to extract dinosaur DNA from amber, but it didn’t work out. Moreover, as the film premiered, Horner admitted to the Las Vegas Review-Journal that while they were starting to understand dinosaurs had feathers, they couldn’t change the dinosaurs in the movies because they needed to remain consistent across all films. Similarly, Bakker consulted on Jurassic Park, advocating for the theory that dinosaurs are ancestors of modern birds, nicknaming the T. rex as “the ten-thousand-pound chicken from hell.”

The film series, Jurassic Park, was based on real scientific research, but Spielberg made mistakes. Horner tried to get dinosaur DNA out of amber, but it didn’t work. Also, while we were learning that dinosaurs had feathers, the dinosaurs in the films couldn’t be changed because they needed to stay consistent. Bakker helped make Jurassic Park and said that dinosaurs are like giant chickens.

On that particular topic, Bakker and Horner found common ground. Despite the apparent rivalry suggested by these movies, Horner and Bakker never allowed their professional disagreements to affect their friendship, always keeping a friendly rapport. They were both thankful for the attention the films brought to their field, as it was a subject they had dedicated their lives to, and at long last, it was receiving the global recognition it deserved.

Read More

2025-01-12 22:31