News Diddy Made ‘Freak Off’ Partygoers Sign NDAs Is Running Around, But A Lawyer Sounded The Alarm Bell About These Months Ago

News Diddy Made ‘Freak Off’ Partygoers Sign NDAs Is Running Around, But A Lawyer Sounded The Alarm Bell About These Months Ago

As a seasoned gamer who has navigated through countless virtual worlds and real-life situations, I find myself deeply concerned about the latest developments surrounding P. Diddy‘s “freak offs” saga. The use of NDAs to maintain a culture of silence and intimidation is troubling, to say the least.


Over the weekend, one of the main stories circulating about P. Diddy and his notorious “freak offs” involved claims that he made people sign Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs). The news added a fresh twist to the ongoing saga, as some attendees of these parties have previously spoken out – discussing topics like women weighing themselves and their experiences at Diddy’s parties. However, it turns out that we have known for several months that Sean “Diddy” Combs is a strong advocate for NDAs. In fact, a lawyer raised concerns about the use of NDAs as early as months ago, labeling them as “terrifying”.

In early 2024, when Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) associated with P. Diddy’s arrest and imprisonment prior to his trial were initially disclosed alongside other news reports, The Miami Herald interviewed a lawyer named Gavin Tudor Elliot regarding these NDAs. He cautioned that they might have fostered an atmosphere of fear and oppression among individuals interacting with the rapper. Additionally, he elucidated to The Miami Herald (and has access to the original copy) why those specific NDAs were particularly “frightening.

As a devoted admirer, let me tell you, this nondisclosure agreement I’ve encountered seems remarkably comprehensive, surpassing any I’ve come across before. What leaves me apprehensive is the vague demarcation of who is and isn’t permitted to be discussed within its confines – a blurry line that’s downright chilling.

Additionally, Elliot points out that the document encompasses a wide range of “intimidation,” stating that it seems to suggest one should simply stay quiet about the matter. The lawsuit in question was initiated as far back as February, and since then, some prominent figures such as Kevin Hart have started distancing themselves from the situation, given their close ties with Diddy.

So, How Do We Know About P. Diddy’s NDAs?

In February 2024, Rodney “Lil Rod” Jones brought a lawsuit against his previous employer, who is also a well-known rapper. Jones claimed that he carried out producing and videography tasks for Diddy during the years 2022 and 2023. As part of this work, he was required to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA), which was referenced in the papers supporting his $30 million claim. The lawsuit also asserted that Diddy had inappropriately touched Jones, and further alleged that Jones was drugged and sexually assaulted during one of the previously mentioned “freak offs.

As a gamer, I’ve recently responded to Rodney “Lil Rod” Jones’ $30 million lawsuit against me. My legal representative, Shawn Holley, has spoken up on my behalf, stating (through Page Six)…

His casual mentioning of non-existent, fabricated events as if they were real, is clearly just an effort to gain attention through sensational news headlines.

Independent of this case, Sean Combs (Diddy) is also dealing with other lawsuits. The existence of this lawsuit triggered the disclosure of a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA), which initially related to an alleged incident involving a shooting that took place at a studio in 2022. Justin Combs, a friend of Sean’s son, was reportedly the victim in this case.

It appears that the Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) are resurfacing due to TMZ obtaining a separate NDA from an event hosted by Diddy, which introduces a fresh complexity to our understanding of how he safeguards information. The latest NDA specifically mentions social media and other platforms, indicating that those who sign cannot discuss what they witnessed backstage. Moreover, this agreement also prohibits individuals from writing books or granting interviews about their behind-the-scenes experiences.

One intriguing detail is that the NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement) remains applicable for as long as 70 years, or an additional 20 years following the demise of Diddy.

Read More

Sorry. No data so far.

2024-11-04 20:07