‘P.I. Moms’ Was a Train Wreck for Lifetime. Now It’s a ‘Trainwreck’ on Netflix

by

The TV network known as Lifetime, often referred to as “Television for Women,” primarily focuses on empowering females, although it may occasionally feature stories involving women killing their husbands (but not necessarily). One of the most compelling demonstrations of this mission is evident in the 2010 series called “P.I. Moms“, if only the show were real.

Seventeen years past, Lifetime commissioned a reality TV show featuring an investigation agency run by soccer moms. From a marketing and branding perspective, it was undeniably smart. However, in practice, it turned out to be an unfortunate disaster. Strangely enough, this might have been the reason why it ended up as one of the eight episodes in Netflix’s critically acclaimed documentary series, Trainwreck, produced by Raw.

In this episode directed by Phil Bowman, we follow the story of Chris Butler, the proprietor of a private investigator firm and a key character in the ‘P.I. Moms’ series. This narrative illustrates how he transitioned from enjoying success with a popular show or potentially a franchise, to finding himself handcuffed instead.

The private investigators, who happened to be mothers, required an efficient detective. However, their investigations consistently collapsed, not due to bad fortune or poor investigation skills, but rather from within – they were being undermined by their own actions.

Carl Marino, who was both a colleague of the moms (including Butler) and an aspiring actor seeking his big break, felt greatly disappointed not to have a leading role in the show P.I. Moms (note: Carl is not actually a mom). In retaliation, he sabotaged the show from within by orchestrating investigations that were intentionally designed to make the main cast members appear inferior, ultimately boosting his own status. Marino, being another private investigator, also involved the cameras and budget of Lifetime in these misguided hunts.

When additional underhandedness was required to sabotage the show, Marino chose to expose the shadiest figure among them: his employer. Known as Butler, the founder of Private Investigations, Inc., and the brain behind the notion that attractive women make the best private investigators, had an illicit activity on the side. In league with a corrupt policeman, Butler and his partner were illegally dealing with drugs that had been confiscated by the authorities, and aggrieved Marino leaked this information to a journalist. It’s puzzling why none of the PI Moms seemed to have noticed or taken action.

The PI Moms series got axed, leaving Butler and Marino jobless from their two positions. Check out the interview with Bowman below to learn more about his Netflix movie that sheds light on this situation.

***

You got only half of the P.I. Moms to participate in the film. Who was the hardest to convince?

Every individual was presented with an open invitation, and Raw Productions meticulously delved into the story’s depth during its development phase. Netflix echoed this sentiment: “Let’s uncover the full extent of the narrative, let’s conduct research, reach out… and discover who is willing to participate.” I find Ami [Wiltz] and Denise [Antoon] delightful, and it was a pleasure getting to know them. Our interactions were effortless because they were prepared to discuss this topic at that specific moment in time. It seems that the right timing for them occurred after a span of 12 to 13 years had elapsed.

It probably helps being on Netflix.

While I’ve worked on various platforms, the approach remains somewhat consistent. It’s not about compelling people to participate, but rather addressing those who are eager to share their experiences. Whether it’s true crime or deeply emotional personal accounts, the individuals must have a genuine motivation to be involved. In a way, their decision to participate creates its own validation.

You’re not always seeking individuals who volunteer for television appearances merely to be on screen; instead, you’re looking for those with genuine intentions. This certainly applies to our Moms. An intriguing aspect of the situation is that they had valid motivations for participating in the reality TV show initially: On one hand, they aimed to inspire other moms by demonstrating a career path they might not have considered before. On another hand, they wanted to spread the message far and wide. Additionally, their personal stories were significant, but unfortunately, these narratives were overshadowed. I felt strongly about creating this film because it provided them with a second opportunity to share their stories and regain what was taken from them.

What was your relationship with Charmagne Peters, Michelle Allen, and the others – namely, Chris (recently released from prison) and Carl – like, and how closely did you interact with them?

Raw and Netflix invited all of us to contribute to the narrative, providing ample chances for participation. However, it’s worth noting that there are some crucial figures in this tale who, for various reasons, decided not to join the project at this particular moment.

In the year 2010, the cable television industry was thriving significantly, with reality shows being its main source of profit. Can you give an idea of the amount that might have been lost in this scenario?

Wow, what an intriguing query! From a financial standpoint, probably not, but if they could franchise the series Butler was part of, expanding it to cities like Atlanta or Chicago, it would have been financially rewarding. You can hear it in the tapped conversations where he persuades Carl [Marino] to cease hindering the show – he wanted its success and saw potential gains from it.

Operating a lucrative segment of a popular reality TV franchise seems to yield greater financial returns, not to mention it’s undeniably safer compared to street drug dealing.

It seems like a pivotal moment similar to the film “Sliding Doors” (1998), where if things had turned out slightly better for the show and events hadn’t gone awry, the outcome could have been drastically different, and this documentary might not have been made. However, it’s possible that the entire “P.I. Moms” network of shows would have thrived instead.

In the narrative provided, both Chris and Carl seem to have played detrimental roles. However, if we are to assign blame, it appears that Carl’s repeated attempts to sabotage the project might make him more culpable compared to Chris, who committed an illegal act but may not have had such a persistent negative impact on the project as Carl did.

Essentially, determining the answer to that question relies on the perspectives of the creators, viewers, and fans of the show, Lucas. It seems that this topic revolves around understanding people’s motivations, deciding what actions are justified, and balancing empathy for others with empathy for oneself. The beauty of the show lies in its complexity, as there are multiple interpretations of the characters’ actions – making it intriguing to consider.

***

Trainwreck: P.I. Moms is now streaming on Netflix.

Read More

2025-07-22 23:55