As a seasoned political analyst with over two decades of experience observing the ebb and flow of American politics, I must say that the recent shift in the Polymarket predictions for the U.S. presidential election has piqued my interest. The trajectory of Donald Trump’s campaign, once seemingly unstoppable, now appears to be facing a challenging road ahead.
As an analyst, I’ve observed a noteworthy shift in the polling data. In the decentralized prediction market, Polymarket – which operates on the Polygon blockchain – Democratic candidate Kamala Harris has surpassed Republican contender Donald Trump.
As an analyst, I would rephrase the statement as follows: Just under a month ago, I was observing that Trump was leading the race for the U.S. presidency and seemed likely to win the election. The successful survival of an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania and his delivery of a significant Bitcoin (BTC) reserve speech in Nashville significantly increased Trump’s chances of victory, with my calculations showing over a 70% likelihood on Polymarket.
Reflecting on the past, I’ve noticed quite a shift in the landscape, and it seems that the certainty of President Trump’s re-election is no longer as strong, judging by predictions made on an on-chain forecasting platform. Currently, Vice President Harris stands at about a 52% chance of winning the November elections, while President Trump hovers around 46%. The remaining 2% of possibilities are scattered among other contenders, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., indicating a tight race ahead.
There’s a lot of uncertainty about whether Trump can carry out his proposed crypto policies, unlike Harris whose stance on digital assets remains unclear. On one side, Trump and Republican representatives such as Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis advocate for keeping America’s Bitcoin reserves and even expanding them by buying more Bitcoin, as suggested in a bill Lummis proposed.
More recently, Harris selected Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate, a choice met with disapproval from the crypto sector due to perceived anti-crypto sentiments. Notably, Matthew Sigel, head of digital asset research at VanEck, pointed out Walz’s past advocacy for stricter crypto regulations aimed at safeguarding U.S. financial security.
Supporters of cryptocurrencies also voiced concerns that the future of blockchain technology might be uncertain if Democrats win another term in the presidency.
In recent times, the “Operation Choke Point 2.0” – a term often used, has ignited strong reactions within the Web3 community. Notably, regulatory bodies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have implemented a broad crackdown on numerous cryptocurrency companies, which includes firms like Coinbase, Kraken, and Ripple.
Additionally, there’s been pushback within the cryptocurrency sector regarding efforts to exclude digital asset companies from conventional banking systems and restrict access to blockchain services. Last week, Customers Bancorp, Inc., a bank known for its crypto-friendly stance, was examined by the Federal Reserve concerning adherence to the Bank Secrecy Act and anti-money laundering regulations.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-08-12 19:34