SHOCK: Orwell’s ‘1984’ Slapped with Trigger Warning

The term “Orwellian: has gotten a workout in recent years.

Elements of George Orwell’s “1984” kept coming to mind as the woke revolution rolled on.

  • Cancel Culture
  • Comedians under fire for … jokes
  • Sensitivity Readers
  • Trigger warnings
  • Apology ToursTM from celebrities

In a startling revelation, author Walter Kirn, well-known for his work “Up in the Air”, disclosed an alarming instance of the contemporary cultural and artistic community being targeted by the so-called ‘woke mob’. Regrettably, this incident surrounds George Orwell’s seminal book.

On “America This Week,” Kirn and fellow host Matt Taibbi, a renowned journalist, delved into the latest edition of “1984.” They shared that this revised version boasts a new preface penned by Thomas Pynchon, an esteemed literary figure. Before unveiling the surprising aspect of the narrative, they discussed it.

“This version of ‘1984’ has trigger warnings,” Kirn said on the podcast.

In celebration of its 75th anniversary, I have the honor of introducing Dolen Perkins-Valdez, a remarkable author whose work includes “Take My Hand.” She elucidates her insights on why some modern readers may find George Orwell’s timeless classic, “1984,” a bit unsettling.

According to Kirn, “I’m appreciating the book for what it offers inherently, not based on its status as a classic, but rather for being an engaging story – that is, up until the main character, Winston, emerges as a complex and challenging figure.

Taibbi starts to laugh as Kirn continues.

[Winston] holds a strong disdain towards most women, particularly the young and attractive ones… Initially, Winston’s views on women may come across as repugnant to modern readers… He is a character who can make one set aside a book.

I wonder, as Kirn casually mentions amidst Perkins-Valdez’s introduction, how many of Hemingway’s and Tolstoy’s books have I discarded?

Back then, as a less experienced reader, I might have acted similarly. However, now, having grown more accustomed to literature, I can distinguish between a character with flaws and a story with issues. I remember that this is a dystopian novel, and Orwell seems to imply that misogyny could be prevalent in such totalitarian societies. Winston, as the protagonist, appears to be a reflection of the society he lives in.

As a discerning movie-goer, I’d like to express my gratitude for the heads-up about ‘1984.’ Reading it feels more prophetic than any other work I’ve encountered. It’s downright Orwellian!

RELATED: TRIGGER WARNINGS WE ACTUALLY NEED!

In simpler terms, Kirn outlines the remainder of the cautionary notice, hinting at allegations that the book may contain racial bias.

Taibbi piles on.

As a movie lover diving into today’s digital landscape, I can’t help but feel overwhelmed by the vast system that seems to be solely dedicated to spreading approved thoughts across every platform – a kind of global thought homogenizer. The algorithms seem to mute voices deemed controversial or outdated, often labeled as ‘Oldthink.’ What truly chills me is the specter of editorialists becoming omnipresent, like silent observers in our minds, weaving their influence into our thoughts, similar to spiders spinning intricate webs within our brains.

As a passionate cinephile who appreciates quality content, let me express my gratitude for your enlightening articles at ebaster.ru. Your independent journalism is a beacon in these challenging times for the media landscape. If you find value in what we’re doing, I kindly invite you to consider contributing to our Tip Jar – your support helps us continue delivering thought-provoking content.

Read More

2025-06-03 20:03