As a researcher with experience in the financial and regulatory landscape of South Korea, I believe that the Democratic Party’s intention to bring spot Bitcoin ETFs into the country is an important step towards modernizing its financial market. However, it will not be an easy feat as the Financial Services Commission (FSC) currently holds a strong stance against such products due to the lack of clear legal framework for cryptocurrencies.
The Democratic Party of South Korea, having secured 175 seats out of a total 300 in the recent elections, intends to carry out their pledged initiative to allow the use of cryptocurrency funds within the country.
As a financial analyst, I would recommend reaching out to the Financial Services Commission (FSC) in South Korea with the intention of requesting a reconsideration of Bitcoin spot Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). This action is crucial for our goal of facilitating the local issuance and trade of these funds.
As a researcher studying the regulatory landscape of cryptocurrencies in finance, I’ve come across the Financial Services Commission (FSC)’s current stance on spot Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). At present, the FSC prohibits their issuance and trading due to the lack of legal recognition for Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as underlying assets. However, there’s a potential shift in the regulatory landscape. The Democratic Party has expressed its readiness to amend existing financial laws if necessary, should the FSC persist in its reluctance to approve spot crypto funds.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs in South Korea
Starting in June, the 22nd National Assembly is set to commence. During this assembly, the Democratic Party plans to introduce a policy enabling local financial institutions to oversee the management of crypto Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) in the spot market. This policy aims to provide retail investors with easy access to these funds without the burden of taxes.
The role of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) in deciding on Bitcoin ETFs is significant, shaping the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrency-related financial products within the country.
A Democratic representative has advocated for reevaluating our regulatory framework in light of emerging global trends. However, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) expresses caution due to the absence of a solid legal foundation and the party’s determination to press on with their current agenda.
Read Also: South Korea Excludes Crypto from Donations Law Amendments
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-05-07 18:46