The Jurassic Park Franchise’s Biggest Plot Holes Explained

The movie ‘Jurassic Park’ is among the most impressive blockbusters ever produced. Its subsequent films are indeed part of the cinematic world, but it’s clear that there’s a substantial difference in quality between the original and its successors. However, as you follow the entire saga of the ‘Jurassic Park’ series, one commonality emerges: The films are filled with inconsistencies.

In the Jurassic Park series, since it involves cloning dinosaurs, it’s expected that some artistic license is needed because the science may not always align perfectly. Sometimes, the science in these films can be puzzling or even contradictory to what was previously established. The Jurassic Park series delves into the perils of mankind meddling with scientific mysteries they don’t fully grasp, acting as a god. However, when you start contemplating the plot inconsistencies too deeply, it becomes challenging to concentrate on those themes or any other aspect of the story.

How can they clone plants and water-based dinosaurs?

In essence, the “Jurassic Park” films depict dinosaur cloning through Dr. Hammond (Richard Attenborough) and his team, using blood samples from mosquitoes preserved in amber and supplementing with contemporary DNA as a placeholder. However, this portrayal raises questions about how they could’ve cloned ancient plants that have been extinct for millions of years. In reality, such a process remains speculative and not yet feasible by current scientific standards.

Ellie Sattler (played by Laura Dern) is surprised to encounter a plant believed extinct since the Cretaceous era. She wonders if mosquitos could have ingested chlorophyll or any other means for plant genetic material to be transported inside them, but suggests that there must be alternative ways for plant matter to be preserved. This preserved matter might be found in fossilized fecal matter from herbivores trapped within amber, which can then be recreated using contemporary plant DNA.

One questionable aspect of the DNA creation in “Jurassic World” is the existence of the mosasaurus, as it’s highly unlikely that a mosquito would have had the opportunity to feed on mosasaurus blood while the creature was momentarily above water. A prevalent fan theory suggests that none of the dinosaurs in “Jurassic Park” were actually created with legitimate dinosaur DNA. Instead, the team led by John Hammond may have engineered entirely new mutations based on popular perceptions of what dinosaurs should look like. In “Jurassic World,” Dr. Wu (B.D. Wong) acknowledges that they’ve always genetically modified the dinosaurs to explain their lack of feathers, but accepting the movies’ premise that these creatures were partly made from real dinosaur DNA requires a significant stretch of logic.

Jurassic Park – Where does the T-Rex come from in the ending?

In the finale of “Jurassic Park”, humans find themselves surrounded by a group of velociraptors. Suddenly, without warning, a Tyrannosaurus rex appears and chomps down on one of the raptors, effectively rescuing the humans. This event underscores that the T-rex isn’t malicious; it’s just an animal, reminding us that we are ultimately at nature’s mercy. It can be helpful or harmful, depending on the situation. However, this scene leaves us wondering about the origin of this particular T-rex.

Since the construction is ongoing, there might have been a gap big enough for a T-rex to squeeze through. However, this doesn’t clarify why no one detected the T-rex before it suddenly appeared on camera to devour a raptor. It’s particularly odd given that we know the T-rex’s strides are forceful, as demonstrated in the well-known scene where its footsteps create ripples in the water. Yet, neither the raptors, who should be sensitive to loud noises, nor Dr. Grant and his companions seem to notice its approach until it attacks the raptors. This becomes even more preposterous when you consider that they were looking right where the T-rex would have been, yet remained unmoved until it took action against the raptors.

Many movie directors manipulate what we perceive as hidden areas in a film, creating an impression that there is more to the story off-camera. As viewers, we often sense a larger world beyond the camera frame. Filmmakers can employ this off-screen space to surprise us, be it for comedic or frightening effect. This technique enhances suspense, but it doesn’t address why no one seemed aware of an approaching T-rex in the story.

The Lost World: Jurassic Park – What kills the crew?

In “The Lost World: Jurassic Park,” dinosaurs make their debut on the mainland for the very first time. A T-Rex is shipped to San Diego and manages to escape upon arrival, wreaking havoc. However, an unusual circumstance arises regarding the T-Rex’s voyage. By the time the S.S. Venture reaches California, all of its human passengers have perished, yet the T-Rex remains confined in its transport cell. So, the question is: what befell the ship’s crew?

There are rumors circulating online suggesting a different version of this sequence initially had velociraptors secretly boarding the ship and wiping out the crew, but this idea appears to have been abandoned. Since no concrete proof supports this theory, we can only assume that the T-rex was responsible for the massacre. The dinosaur was tranquilized prior, so it would’ve had to regain consciousness, consume everyone on board, and then end up back in the cargo hold again.

In a scenario that seems more like a product of creative storytelling than reality, it appears that the widely-accepted explanation suggests the T-rex caused destruction on the ship prior to its arrival at land. However, considering the sequence of events, this idea seems rather implausible. It’s worth pondering if this might be another instance where director Steven Spielberg aimed to craft an exciting, suspenseful scene using a derelict ship crew as a chilling precursor to the forthcoming events. Regrettably, upon even brief reflection, the logical consistency of this narrative begins to unravel.

Jurassic Park III – How does Eric Kirby survive for eight weeks on his own?

In the “Jurassic Park” series, some truly gruesome deaths have occurred over time. It seems that even experienced combatants and hired guns are no match for dinosaurs. Surprisingly, against all odds and common sense, a 12-year-old boy named Eric Kirby (played by Trevor Morgan) was able to endure on a dinosaur-filled island for eight weeks without help until his parents and Dr. Grant arrived to rescue him.

It seems this scenario might be highlighting Eric’s cleverness, but it challenges our understanding of the franchise up until now. For weeks, Eric has been hiding in a delivery truck stocked with food, yet getting there initially appears to have been an enormous task for a child. After eight weeks, a T-rex or spinosaurus would likely have detected him within the truck and destroyed it trying to get at him. The only plausible explanation is that Eric has remarkably good luck on his side.

There’s also the issue of him having a vial containing T-rex urine. When Grant inquires about its origin, Eric simply replies, “You don’t want to know.” The substance within that vial is undoubtedly urine; it wasn’t obtained by digging it out from the ground or anything like that. Moreover, he is aware that this liquid deters smaller dinosaurs but attracts spinosauruses. If his knowledge of this effect came from personal experience, it would mean he had to evade one of those creatures, which seems highly unlikely. Normally, a character in the “Jurassic Park” franchise should have perished almost instantly upon being stranded on the island. However, a child’s death might be too extreme for the series, but under regular circumstances, Eric would have met his end shortly after being trapped there.

Jurassic Park III – Why can’t the spinosaurus break through a door?

In “Jurassic Park III,” the spinosaurus makes a formidable entrance, proving itself capable of defeating a T-rex and earning the title of the most fearsome dinosaur. Numerous sequences highlight the ferocity of this beast, such as when Alan Grant and Eric narrowly avoid it in a cage. Even after they’ve escaped, they remain in danger as the spinosaurus rams through a barrier fence and pursues them relentlessly. It appears invincible until, surprisingly, it encounters an obstacle – a door – just a few minutes later.

Although the door appears sturdy, it doesn’t seem much more robust than the enclosure a Spinosaurus easily demolished. Even if we assume the door is unbreachable, what would have prevented the Spinosaurus from smashing through the walls to gain entry into the building instead?

In simpler terms, the Spinosaurus is like a character in a story that can be extremely formidable when needed, but becomes less strong when the protagonists require respite. The designer of this island’s enclosures might as well have built them entirely out of doors, because it seems the Spinosaurus’ main vulnerability lies there.

Jurassic World – Why did scientists make the Indominus Rex invisible?

As a die-hard Jurassic Park fan, I was thrilled when the franchise was reborn in 2015 with “Jurassic World,” setting box office records as the highest-grossing film within the series. However, this revival seemed to introduce a swarm of plot inconsistencies and conundrums, particularly concerning the Indominus Rex, a genetically modified dinosaur. Unlike the T-rex and velociraptor, which are based on real-life creatures, the Indominus Rex was an entirely new entity, boasting powers unmatched in the animal world. Its intelligence allowed it to communicate with velociraptors, while its ability to blend seamlessly into its surroundings raised questions about its design from the start.

The camouflage ability enables the I-rex to approach security personnel undetected and eliminate them, yet it’s puzzling why the scientists at Jurassic World would grant it such power initially. After all, the primary purpose of designing this creature was to serve as a dazzling new attraction at the park. If it can essentially become invisible, making it impossible for visitors to spot it, then how are tourists expected to enjoy their visit? Visitors who have paid a substantial sum to experience the park would likely seek refunds if the main attraction opted to hide all the time.

A recurring idea in the “Jurassic Park” series is that because humans are capable of doing something, it doesn’t necessarily follow that they should. It seems the researchers, whom we presume to be intelligent individuals, might have given more careful consideration to their actions.

Jurassic World – What’s the deal with the gyrospheres?

Upon reflection, Jurassic World seems to have numerous design flaws. For example, consider the gyrosphere ride. These spheres accommodate two passengers who can explore among herbivores, reminiscent of safari rides in zoos where people get close to zebras. However, it’s concerning that these spheres aren’t tethered to a track, leaving one to wonder about the safety precautions if someone were to collide with a dinosaur, potentially causing harm.

Apart from the time limit issue, how long should this gyrosphere tour typically last? Given that only a certain number of gyrospheres are available, with two individuals per sphere, one could potentially hog a gyrosphere for extended periods, preventing other visitors from enjoying the experience. There’s no option to recall them, as demonstrated by Zach (Nick Robinson) and Gray (Ty Simpkins), who ignore the return-to-station directive and venture deeper into the attraction.

As a gamer, I must admit that the concept of being in charge of a gyrosphere sounds like an exhilarating experience, especially when things take a turn for the wild with the Indominus Rex running amok. However, from a practical standpoint, it doesn’t hold up as a ride design.

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom – Why would you build the theme park near an active volcano?

We’ve discussed several puzzling elements about the fully operational Jurassic World park, and none compare to the most bewildering question: Why construct a theme park on an island with an active volcano? It truly boggles the mind!

In the latest installment of “Jurassic Park”, characters Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard) and Owen Grady (Chris Pratt) revisit Isla Nublar with a mission to rescue as many dinosaurs as they can, given the island’s impending volcanic eruption. It’s hard not to question why a theme park was ever built on such a volatile location. Although it is mentioned in the original 1990 novel that Isla Nublar is an extinct volcano with active steam vents, this detail wasn’t highlighted in any of the previous films.

Interpreting generously, constructing a theme park on an island with a dormant volcano could be seen as another cost-saving measure by John Hammond. Despite his claims in the initial “Jurassic Park” film about prioritizing safety, numerous incidents suggest he was stingy. This situation may follow suit, as Hammond might have assumed the volcano was harmless due to its prolonged dormancy. However, if there’s one area where Hammond should never have cut corners, it would be in hiring a geologist to confirm the volcano’s stability before construction.

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom – Why don’t the tranquilizers kill humans?

It’s wise to view the science depicted in the “Jurassic Park” films with a significant pinch of skepticism, given they are works of fiction. While some aspects might stretch believability, even disregarding cloning, the way certain elements like using a real-life drug in “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom” are presented in the plot is questionable at best.

The hired guns administer carfentanil-laced tranquilizers to subdue the dinosaurs, as this powerful drug in reality is 100 times stronger than fentanyl. A minuscule amount can be lethal to humans, implying Owen Grady should definitely be deceased. However, when Owen and the mercenaries find Blue, they shoot at her to make the raptor drowsy. Later, they aim their guns at Owen, realizing he’s betrayed them, and fire him with the same tranquilizers laced with carfentanil. Since the dose was meant for a dinosaur, it seems implausible that Owen would have regained consciousness after such a nap.

As a gamer, I find it hardly relevant that Zia seems to withdraw the dart before administering its full dose. Frankly, even a tiny bit should have proven fatal. Instead of being vague about what those tranquilizers are made of, they chose to mention a specific substance, which only sparks more curiosity and unanswered questions.

Jurassic World Dominion – Why does Owen’s hand trick work on other dinosaurs?

In the movie “Jurassic World,” Owen is depicted as a skilled raptor trainer, particularly with a dinosaur named Blue. He communicates with them using an unusual method – extending his arm straight out in front of him while keeping his palm open. This technique helps him maintain control over the raptors when they become agitated. Throughout the series, this method is used whenever Owen needs to manage Blue due to her familiarity with it. However, in “Jurassic World Dominion,” Owen starts using this hand gesture with all dinosaurs he encounters, surprisingly, and it proves effective each time.

In ‘Jurassic World Dominion,’ one aspect that seems illogical is that a wild parasaurolophus calms down when Owen simply puts a rope around its neck and extends his hand. This doesn’t seem plausible because it’s similar to teaching your own pet trick and expecting an unfamiliar dog to follow the same commands. Since the dinosaur wouldn’t have received the same training, why does it obey Owen?

In the dinosaur market scene, he repeats the same actions, and it seems like a habit or instinct for him. If things go as planned, that’s wonderful. However, if the dinosaurs continue to be unruly, his next move is to switch to Plan B – which essentially means he flees.

Jurassic World Dominion – What exactly are Maisie’s origins?

In the film “Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom,” a new character named Maisie (played by Isabella Sermon) is introduced. The narrative suggests that Lockwood, portrayed by James Cromwell, created Maisie as a means to keep a part of his deceased daughter alive. This act of human cloning ultimately led to his rift with Hammond. However, in “Jurassic World Dominion,” her origins are rewritten, making Maisie a more complex and puzzling figure within the Jurassic series.

In the revised version of “Dominion”, it is revealed that Maisie was actually born as a clone from Dr. Charlotte Lockwood, her biological mother. To save Maisie from the disease that ultimately claimed her life, Lockwood removed the fatal condition from Maisie’s DNA. At first, Lockwood may have wanted to keep this truth hidden from Maisie for some time, but it seems deceptive actions were taken because the franchise struggled with how to develop her character further. However, it appears as though they changed Maisie’s origin story when they needed a different direction for the plot.

2025-06-29 07:01