This 1970s Universal Monsters Classic Is One of the Best Adaptations You Might’ve Missed

This 1970s Universal Monsters Classic Is One of the Best Adaptations You Might've Missed

As a long-time aficionado of all things dark and gothic, I must say that the 1979 adaptation of Dracula has been a hidden gem for me. It’s one of those films that often gets overshadowed by its predecessors and successors, but it truly deserves a spot in any Count Dracula completist’s library.


Dracula is a character who constantly changes with each passing generation, often appearing in multiple forms. In recent times alone, we’ve witnessed fresh interpretations of the character in “Renfield”, “Abigail”, and “The Last Voyage of the Demeter”. Besides these, there have been numerous adaptations straight from Bram Stoker’s cherished novel. The Count is quite versatile, so it’s easy to overlook some of his many transformations.

1979 saw an overlooked yet captivating adaptation of Dracula by Universal Pictures. Similar to the 1931 original, this version was influenced by a successful stage production, boasting grand sets, a star-studded cast featuring notable actors, a score by John Williams, and a charismatic new lead playing the title character. Over the past 45 years, it has often been overshadowed by portrayals from Bela Lugosi, Christopher Lee, and Gary Oldman. However, with its recent availability on Peacock (perfect timing for Halloween), a fresh audience can now appreciate this cinematic gem. It’s a rich Gothic treat that should not be missed.

For More on Dracula

Exploring the Terrifying Onscreen Interpretations of Dracula

Why 1979’s Dracula is essential viewing for Count Dracula completists

about:blank

Similar to Bela Lugosi, Frank Langella refined his portrayal of Dracula on the stage. In 1977, he headlined a Broadway production of the story, derived from Hamilton Deane and John Balderston’s 1924 stage play. The performance was met with great acclaim, especially among female theater-goers who were captivated by his alluring character. Langella, while embodying Dracula, started to view him as a charming yet misunderstood hero, a solitary figure whose sole comfort lies in the women he entices. The Count’s beastly nature is evident, but so too is a vein of tragic romance that paints Dracula as someone who, though he may be momentarily loved, remains forever unknowable.

When it was time to transition the latest Broadway play into a film, producers Marvin and Walter Mirisch pitched the idea by highlighting its differences from previous, more sensual portrayals of Count Dracula. Actors like Christopher Lee had portrayed the character as both fearsome to men and alluring to women captivated by his supernatural abilities. This new Dracula, as marketed, was not only feared but adored by females. Tony Curtis’s portrayal exuded romantic charm with his sleek, well-groomed hair and tailored tuxedos. The imposing stature and more menacing side of Bela Lugosi and Christopher Lee were absent in this version. Instead, this Dracula embodied sophistication at its finest.

In the movie version directed by John Badham, legendary actor Laurence Olivier was brought in to portray Abraham Van Helsing, while Donald Pleasence took on the role of Dr. Jack Seward, a long-time figure in the genre. The duo of Van Helsing and Seward as vampire hunters might be recognizable to fans of “Dracula”, as is the presence of Renfield (Tony Haybarth). However, some changes have been made to the cast. Mina (Jan Francis) and Lucy (Kate Nelligan) are still present, but their roles have been switched: Mina becomes an early victim in a tragic turn, while Lucy takes on the role of Dracula’s love interest. Interestingly, both women are depicted as the daughters of the main characters, with Lucy being Seward’s daughter and Mina being Van Helsing’s.

Instead, let me rephrase it in a more natural and easy-to-understand way: The plot takes a turn, but it keeps things intriguing as Seward and Van Helsing struggle to save their children’s lives and souls. This adds a very personal aspect to the narrative, especially when Van Helsing contemplates an unimaginable act to preserve his daughter’s eternal soul. Both Pleasence and Olivier deliver compelling performances in this respect.

This 1970s Universal Monsters Classic Is One of the Best Adaptations You Might've Missed

In this movie, Langella truly stands out as a powerful figure. Initially, his portrayal of Dracula might seem somewhat restrained, but it’s in his eyes where the magic lies. He skillfully plays the Count as if he were just a wealthy gentleman trying to court a beautiful lady. However, with a simple shift in his demeanor, he transforms into a fierce beast who yearns to devour everything around him, in any manner possible. It’s an outstanding performance, a perfect example of an actor breathing new life into an iconic role. Anyone who is a Dracula enthusiast or simply wants a fresh take on the character should definitely watch it.

Beyond Langella’s captivating performance, what truly resonates about the 1979 production is its overwhelming Gothic intensity. From John Williams’ enchanting music to the sets, and how Badham masterfully blends the opulent nature of Dracula with the gloominess of the Yorkshire coastline, this interpretation is far from the glamorous London version of Dracula. Instead, it offers a more authentic feel that makes Count Dracula even more striking. The production achieves an impressive balance between realism and tonal depth.

Although it may not be the most outstanding Dracula film ever produced, the 1979 version of Dracula is nonetheless crucial in understanding the on-screen evolution of the character. This Halloween, consider watching it on Peacock for a spooky viewing experience.

Read More

2024-09-17 01:16