As a connoisseur of cinema who has traversed the silver screen since the age of popcorn and flickering reels, I must say that the original 1969 version of “The Italian Job” holds a special place in my heart. While the remake from 2003 is an enjoyable romp with its own merits, it simply cannot match the charm and charisma of the classic film.
As a die-hard movie enthusiast who’s got a soft spot for heist films, let me tell you that “The Italian Job” stands tall in this genre, boasting not one, but two unique interpretations. The initial flick graced the silver screen back in 1969, while its contemporary version hit cinemas in 2003. Both pictures revolve around a gold heist set against a breathtaking Italian backdrop. While certain elements link them, each film also offers distinct differences that set them apart.
The Cunning Plot of 1969’s The Italian Job
In 1969, I found myself starring in an exhilarating, colorful comedy heist film. As Charlie Croker, a charismatic rogue fresh out of prison, I masterminded an audacious scheme to pilfer from the Italian automobile giant, Fiat. With a nod from the notorious gangster John Bridger, played by none other than the legendary playwright Noël Coward, I assembled my band of misfits.
As a passionate cinephile, I can’t help but reminisce about the thrilling tale where I found myself in the thick of a heist. The mafia had caught wind of our daring plan, yet somehow, Croker, our crafty protagonist, outsmarted them all and snatched the gold from their convoy. Using an audacious trio of Mini Coopers, we sped through bustling shopping piazzas and descended steep church steps in one of the most iconic and impactful car chases of the 20th century.
2003’s Version of The Italian Job Stands on Its Own
2003’s film, titled “The Italian Job,” is not a straightforward remake. It begins with a gold heist in Italy as an introduction, but the main story unfolds in America. The characters Bridger (Donald Sutherland) and Croker (Mark Wahlberg), along with Handsome Rob (Jason Statham) and Steve Frazelli (Edward Norton), execute the heist. However, it’s revealed that Frazelli is a traitor who keeps the gold for himself, abandoning the team to their fate.
Croker is determined to reclaim the gold, so he gathers his team, including Stella, Bridger’s daughter played by Charlize Theron, who is skilled at opening safes. The Mini cars make a comeback as they execute the heist at Frazelli’s mansion, then speed through the labyrinth of Los Angeles’ subways and freeways. A helicopter pursues them relentlessly, piloted by Frazelli, tracking their movements throughout the chase.
Two Italian Jobs Competing for the Gold
The spirit of camaraderie permeates both movies; the group members stand by each other, and some character names are consistent. Both films showcase their memorable escape sequences in Mini Coopers adorned with red, white, and blue, though the chase in 1969 takes place in Italy, while the one in 2003 occurs in the United States. Regardless of the location, these colors seem to symbolize their home nation’s flag (the Union Jack or the American flag).
Two women exude confidence in every movie they’re in. In the original storyline, Lorna, Croker’s girlfriend, adds a touch of playfulness and liveliness to the screen without participating in the heist. However, in the updated version, Stella is deeply involved with the team, even driving one of the Minis, mirroring another film from that year featuring powerful female action roles, Kill Bill.
The 1969 version, while not overly dramatic, maintains a playful tone; the dialogue among characters is sharp and fast-moving. In one instance, Arthur accidentally destroys an entire van instead of just blowing off the doors during a rehearsal for the heist. Croker quips with another iconic remark, “You were only meant to blow the bloody doors off!” This line has become widely recognized, often imitated by Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon in their portrayals of Michael Caine in The Trip, symbolizing classic British wit.
2003’s film has less overall silliness compared to its counterpart, but it does provide moments of humor, such as Lyle (Seth Green) pretending to be a girl that Handsome Rob is flirting with. The focus here seems to be more on action sequences and daring stunts, rather than character growth. One standout scene is the high-speed boat chase through Venice at the beginning, which has a polished Hollywood touch. However, it lacks the memorable performances that the ’69 version offers.
Which Movie Does the Better Job?
For numerous reasons, the initial release of “The Italian Job” stands out as a superior film compared to its 2003 remake. A significant factor is the nostalgic charm of the ’60s backdrop and set design that exudes an infectious enthusiasm missing in the latter version. Moreover, the acting is more captivating and enduring, and given it was the original, it undoubtedly paved the way for other British movies, earning the label as one of the quintessential British films.
The 2003 remake of “The Italian Job” can be seen as a continuation rather than a direct follow-up. With an impressive cast and a fresh take on the story, it appeals to new viewers, but fails to capture the original’s appeal. It’s enjoyable, but doesn’t surpass any lists of ‘best movies ever made’. Recognizing its differences is important, yet the powerful screen presence of Michael Caine and the unforgettable climax in the 1969 version make it the superior choice.
Watch The Italian Job
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-11-29 02:02