10 War Movies Military Experts Denounced

As someone who has spent countless hours delving into the intricacies of war movies and their historical accuracy, I must say that these films are always a mixed bag. On one hand, they offer an exhilarating glimpse into the raw intensity and unpredictability of combat, but on the other, they often fall short when it comes to historical authenticity.

Many film directors and scriptwriters lack personal experience in war situations, which can lead them to form somewhat distorted perceptions about what war truly entails. As a result, some of their productions may stir disapproval among military professionals and veterans due to inaccuracies or exaggerations. However, it’s important to note that this is not always intentional. In an effort to provide the most engaging content possible, they occasionally produce films that distort or misrepresent war experiences, either subtly or significantly.

War films frequently encounter greater criticism due to geopolitical connections and because war is seldom a casual affair for those involved. It’s reasonable that those putting their lives on the line would be sensitive about the accuracy of portrayals of events. Therefore, it’s understandable that military experts feel justified in correcting perceived inaccuracies, while directors also have the freedom to innovate in their storytelling. So, which war movies sparked disagreements among war experts and participants?

10 The Hurt Locker (2009)

The Hurt Locker plunges viewers straight into the war-torn landscapes of Iraq, where Sergeant JT Sanborn (Anthony Mackie) and Specialist Owen Eldridge (Jeremy Renner), members of the Explosive Ordnance Disposal unit, find it challenging to accept their demanding new team leader, Staff Sergeant William James. He is overly aggressive and frequently takes dangerous chances, causing the two main characters constant unease. Fresh off the loss of their former leader, they grapple with adjusting to the new situation, leaving them emotionally drained.

Soldiers Need to Communicate

Katheryn Bigalow is renowned for creating hard-hitting films that compel viewers to grapple with the harsh realities of war. Her groundbreaking work won the prestigious Best Picture award, making her the first woman to achieve this milestone. The movie, characterized by its subtle and tender nature, was meticulously crafted, as demonstrated by the intricate cinematography and exceptional performances delivered by the two principal actors.

It’s quite astonishing to note that ex-military personnel expressed unfavorable opinions about the film. In an article for Bouhammer, combat veteran Troy Steward was taken aback by the fact that a film receiving numerous awards could be so poor in quality. Likewise, Iraq War veteran Kate Hoit penned a piece in The Huffington Post, highlighting several inaccuracies in the movie such as incorrect uniforms and lack of radio communication. A similar sentiment was expressed on Vet Voice.

In actual situations, Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD) technicians don’t carry out risky operations as self-reliant three-person teams without communication equipment. It is also unlikely to hear an EOD Sergeant First Class (E-7) proposing to two or three of his colleagues that they depart the scene of an explosion in an Iraqi city by saying: “Alright, let’s go separate ways. We can cover more ground this way.

Well, Bigalow will be glad the Academy panel had no vets.

Stream it on AMC+ or rent it on Apple TV+

9 Jarhead (2006)

The character played by Jake Gyllenhaal, named Anthony “Swoff” Swofford, exhibits a typical eagerness often associated with warfare, envisioning himself taking down enemies from miles away. However, during Operation Desert Shield in the Gulf War, he finds the reality to be far less action-packed than anticipated. Surprisingly, throughout the entire conflict, he never had the opportunity to discharge a single shot.

“Jarhead” Isn’t a Common Term

In an unprecedented reception among American viewers upon its debut, this unconventional, insightful film garnered numerous Satellite award nominations and propelled Jake Gyllenhaal to international fame. Sam Mendes’ meticulous, vibrant cinematography and Thomas Newman’s captivating musical score harmoniously accentuated the narrative. The movie remains a must-watch for those seeking exceptional films about the Gulf War. Remarkably, despite being adapted from a real marine memoir by Swofford, it faced criticism from a marine captain.

On Slate, Captain Nathaniel Fick voiced his opinions about the film, stating that it fails to provide a reason for soldiers participating in unofficial leisure activities during their assignments. He also argued that the depicted strain isn’t as harmful as shown in the Sam Mendes movie. Lastly, he clarified that the term “Jarhead” is not as frequently used by Marines as portrayed in the film.

8 Green Zone (2010)

According to the 2006 non-fiction book “Imperial Life in the Emerald City” by investigative journalist Rajiv Chandrasekaran, the movie “Green Zone” centers around U.S. Army Chief Warrant Officer Roy Miller (played by Matt Damon), who leads a Mobile Exploitation Team (MET). He’s dispatched to Iraq in search of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). However, he uncovers that much of the information provided to him is incorrect, and his attempts to discover the truth are obstructed by an official from the U.S. Department of Defense.

A General Lack of Caution

In a more relaxed and conversational tone: Green Zone boasts breathtaking aesthetics and a classic film noir vibe. At the time, it featured Matt Damon at the peak of his Jason Bourne stardom, yet it failed to impress at the box office, even with Paul Greengrass as its director. While some appreciated its exposé on government deception, many military personnel took issue with it. As a former Iraq War soldier, Jay Dorleus found himself bothered by the film’s portrayal of careless soldiers in his analysis for Insider.

I’m rating this as a 4 out of 10, primarily due to their handling of the situation involving the sniper. With the sniper at large and everyone exposed, it seemed risky as he could have effortlessly taken them down before they even reached the building.

Among the rare mistakes in their career, it’s one that Damon and Greengrass might find hard to forget, but one they can certainly learn from.

Stream it on Prime Video

7 Platoon (1986)

In the movie titled “Platoon”, we witness the transformation of Chris Taylor, portrayed by Charlie Sheen, from a hopeful young man to a disillusioned one. Upon arriving in Vietnam, he encounters the brutal truths of war. What adds to his distress is an internal conflict within his unit, which arises due to a disagreement between Staff Sergeant Barnes (Tom Berenger) advocating for the mistreatment of nearby villagers, and Sergeant Elias (Willem Dafoe), who shows compassion towards the locals.

Racism Rears Its Ugly Head Once Again

Influenced by Oliver Stone’s personal experiences as a U.S. infantry soldier in Vietnam and beautifully captured on the verdant, coastal island of Ludon in the Philippines, this poignantly crafted story of internal conflict serves as a powerful testament to the filmmaker’s empathetic perspective, skillfully weaving dark emotional undertones into every frame. The film garnered the accolade of Best Picture and its enduring legacy was further solidified by the iconic image of Willem Dafoe’s character kneeling with his arms raised aloft. Stone aimed to portray Vietnam more authentically, having been critical of John Wayne’s The Green Berets, however, it seems he encountered some missteps along the way.

Wallace Terry, a war correspondent who covered Vietnam for two years, expressed his dismay to People magazine, stating that the representation of black troops in the film was “an insult.” He emphasized that none of the characters were portrayed as officers, and all three black soldiers depicted in the movie were shown as cowards. A year after the release of the movie, Bennie J. Swans, a black war veteran, expressed similar concerns to The Chicago Tribune.

6 Pearl Harbor (2001)

10 War Movies Military Experts Denounced

The story of Pearl Harbor revolves around two childhood friends from America, Rafe McCawley (Ben Affleck) and Danny Walker (Josh Hartnett). Upon the outbreak of World War II, they both sign up as pilots, with Rafe heading off to battle in Europe alongside the Royal Air Force of England. Meanwhile, at home, his girlfriend, Evelyn (Kate Beckinsale), finds herself drawn to Danny. A romantic entanglement develops, but before it can be resolved, the Japanese launch their surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.

Bay Gets the Explosions Right, But Not the Facts.

One popular war film, “Pearl Harbor,” skillfully paints love and camaraderie against the backdrop of conflict. Known for his expertise in explosive scenes, Michael Bay made a commendable attempt with this movie, but it falls short in portraying the actual attack accurately. As reported by The Washington Post, pilot Kenneth M. Taylor, who flew the P-40 Warhawk during the raid and served as inspiration for the film’s characters, criticized the movie as an overly sensationalized work of fiction.

Stream it on Hulu and Tubi

5 The Wall (2017)

During the War in Iraq, one enigmatic sniper named Juba, affiliated with the Islamic Army in Iraq, posed a significant threat to American troops. He was revered by locals after recording many of his deadly shots. The movie “The Wall” portrays Juba’s exploits, primarily focusing on two U.S. soldiers (portrayed by Aaron Taylor Johnson and John Cena), who find themselves pinned down while hiding behind a damaged wall, trying to strategize their next move.

The Soldiers Are Dumb

Doug Liman’s gripping, intense narrative features moments that may make you wince due to its graphic violence and vibrant landscapes. However, the true pleasure comes from observing the predicament of the two main characters. Their failed attempts to contact headquarters for help give a poignant, optimistic flavor to the story. Each attempt seems futile, crashing against an invisible barrier, while the gunfire continues relentlessly. This results in one of the most captivating sniper films ever produced.

In an analysis for Insider, Iraq War veteran Jay Dorleus expresses his disapproval towards the apparent lack of tactical acumen displayed by some soldiers in the film. He particularly criticizes the questionable decisions made following an incident where a soldier is injured.

In their military training, they instruct us on self-care, which means if I’m injured, it’s my responsibility to attend to my wound. That’s exactly what he should have done in this situation. Instead of lying there dramatically after being wounded, he should have immediately attended to his injury. There was a Humvee nearby, so he could have crawled towards that for safety from the sniper. There’s no valid reason why his companion had to risk himself by making a hasty escape.

Indeed, studios need to dedicate more budgets to research and consulting experts.

Stream it on Prime Video

4 Red Tails (2012)

During World War II, the skies above Red Tails are filled with intense conflict, and a group of black cadets are diligently honing their skills, secretly longing for some thrilling action. This desire finds an unexpected outlet when the Civil Aeronautics Authority issues an order to assemble a team of black men to fly fighter planes. At first glance, this opportunity seems promising, but it’s not all that it appears. As these pilots strive to advance their careers, they encounter racial discrimination and are often hampered by bureaucratic hurdles.

Facts in the Movie Were Disputed by Actual Participants

Featuring a compelling screenplay by John Ridley (most famously recognized for 12 Years a Slave), this film is greatly enhanced by the outstanding performances of David Oyelewo, Ne-Yo, and Michael B. Jordan. These captivating characters are ambitious young men eager to delve into warfare, regardless of the repercussions. Stunning set designs also draw us into the distinctive atmosphere of the 1940s era. Regrettably, there are some inaccuracies in certain details.

In a set of discussions called “Tuskegee Airman Webinars – ‘Did the Film Get it Right’?”, veterans Colonel Charles McGee and Colonel Harold Brown pointed out discrepancies found in the film “Red Tails”. The main issues revolve around casualty numbers and individual war records. Contrary to what is portrayed in the movie, there were indeed losses among team members due to enemy fire, contradicting a pilot’s claim that no one was killed during combat.

Stream it on Disney+

3 Full Metal Jacket (1987)

In the movie “Full Metal Jacket,” a confident recruit named J.T., played by Matthew Modine, reports to a military training base in South Carolina. There, he is subjected to rigorous discipline under the tough Gunnery Sergeant Hartman, portrayed by Lee Ermey. The lazy soldier Gomer Pyle, played by Vincent Donforio, also attends this grueling course. Few trainees manage to survive and those who do eventually encounter the brutal realities of war in the Vietnamese cities Da Nang and Huế – as depicted in the film We Were Soldiers.

Some Combat Decisions Don’t Make Sense

In a nutshell, “Full Metal Jacket” offers an exhilarating blend of boot camp and warfare cinema that keeps viewers hooked from beginning to end, all while benefiting greatly from Stanley Kubrick’s meticulous direction. One captivating moment is when a Vietnamese teenager skillfully takes out soldiers one by one using a sniper rifle. Despite its entertaining nature, it should be noted that the film does not always provide an authentic representation of actual combat situations.

In a YouTube video, military history professor Bill Allison points out an error: Marines are shown charging into a location they had previously surveyed (a flawed tactic). Moreover, he mentions that Hue City appears quite different from its real-life likeness, primarily because the footage was shot in London.

Stream it on Paramount+ or Fubo

2 We Were Soldiers (2002)

According to the book “We Were Soldiers Once… and Young” by retired Lieutenant General Hal Moore and war reporter Joseph L. Galloway, the film “We Were Soldiers” recounts the Battle of Ia Drang in November 1965. This was the initial significant conflict between the United States Army and the People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN). Notably, it is recognized for being the first large-scale operation involving helicopters and Boeing B-52 Stratofortress strategic bombers.

The Film Mixes Up Two Groups of the Vietnamese Military

In contrast to many Hollywood films about the Vietnam War, We Were Soldiers avoids the bias often seen in such productions. Instead, it presents a balanced portrayal of both American forces and their enemies, emphasizing both their strengths and weaknesses. Moreover, this movie doesn’t shy away from depicting the harsh realities of combat, offering an unflinching look at warfare. However, it’s been pointed out by military history professor Bill Allison in a YouTube video that there are some factual discrepancies. For instance, the People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN) is portrayed as using extensive tunnel networks during battlefield operations. This, however, was more characteristic of the Viet Cong, not PAVN.

Stream it on MGM+ or Fubo

1 Saving Private Ryan (1998)

The film “Saving Private Ryan,” directed by Steven Spielberg, is often recognized for sparking renewed curiosity about World War II. This classic has paved the way for numerous other movies and television series set within this historical period. The narrative unfolds in Normandy, France, during 1944, amidst the ongoing war, and follows a determined squad of soldiers, under Captain John Miller (Tom Hanks), as they embark on a mission to track down Private James Francis Ryan (Matt Damon) and ensure his safe return home, following the tragic loss of his three other brothers in battle.

The Brits Were Ignored

As a passionate cinephile, I can’t help but reflect on the profound impact of “Saving Private Ryan” in 1998. Although it didn’t clinch the Best Picture award (losing to “Shakespeare in Love”), its defeat is often cited as one of the most surprising twists in awards history.

As a keen observer and supporter of historical accounts, I find myself in agreement with the sentiments expressed by British war veterans, as reported by the BBC. They seem displeased that a particular movie appeared to over-emphasize America’s role in the D-Day events, potentially overshadowing the significant contributions made by other Allied forces. A former member of the Royal Navy, Ron Massingham, echoed these feelings.

It was disheartening to notice that British craftsmanship wasn’t depicted, despite it being the pioneer, as the initial assault crews were actually British. Instead, the portrayal focused solely on American crews.

Nevertheless, Spielberg remains firm in his stance. In various discussions, the director repeatedly emphasized that no British troops were present at the specified moment.

Stream it on Prime Video or Paramount+

2024-09-14 05:02