Craig Wright Faces UK Prosecution Over Perjury Claims

by

As a seasoned researcher with a deep interest in the world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, I find the recent developments in the Craig Wright vs. Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) case particularly intriguing. The allegations that Wright has perjured himself during the trial are serious, and if proven true, would have significant implications for the Bitcoin community and beyond.

Craig Wright, who asserts himself as the true identity of Bitcoin‘s pseudonymous creator Satoshi Nakamoto, faces potential perjury investigations by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) due to disputed evidence submitted in a lawsuit initiated by the Crypto Open Patent Alliance.

In 2021, a non-profit organization named COPA, comprised of Bitcoin developers, initiated a legal action against Wright to prevent him from asserting copyright over the Bitcoin whitepaper and threatening lawsuits against Bitcoin developers under the false pretense of being Satoshi Nakamoto.

Some prominent individuals, including Jack Dorsey of Twitter and Coinbase, have advocated for a definitive decision that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto.

In a ruling made public in March, Judge James Mellor determined that Wright was not Satoshi Nakamoto. However, in a more recent decision in May, the judge strongly accused Wright of telling numerous untruths during the court proceedings. In a document submitted today, the judge recommended that U.K. legal authorities consider filing perjury charges against Wright.

According to the statements made by Judge Mellor in the court records, he plans to forward the case involving Craig Wright to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). The CPS will evaluate the evidence and determine whether to bring charges against Wright for suspected perjury and forgery. If they choose to proceed, they may also issue a warrant for his arrest or initiate extradition processes based on his present whereabouts.

As a researcher, I’d recommend reaching out to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for further information about Stefan Matthews, who testified on behalf of Wright during the trial.

According to Mellor’s declaration, Mr. Matthews indeed played a pivotal role in Dr. Wright’s long-term effort to be recognized as Satoshi. In this function, he acted as a substantial backer and disseminator of that false claim.

Read More

2024-07-16 23:16