Medal of Honor Walked So Call of Duty Could Run

by

The back-and-forth competition between Call of Duty and Medal of Honor is undeniably one of the most intriguing rivalries that has unfolded within the realm of video game history.

The back-and-forth battle between Call of Duty and Medal of Honor is certainly one of the most captivating rivalries to have emerged in the world of gaming over time.

The apprentice surpassed the master on this occasion, not because the master was less skilled, but rather due to perfect timing and circumstances aligning favorably for the apprentice.

As an avid enthusiast, I can’t help but notice that when it comes to groundbreaking innovations in the world of major shooters, there seems to be a shared pool of ideas that have been subtly influenced by their predecessors. It’s not about who did it first, but rather about how each game has built upon what was already established and added its unique twist.

Back in the day, before Call of Duty ruled the roost in first-person shooters, Medal of Honor reigned supreme. For quite some time, it stood as the epitome of World War II shooting games, offering immersive storylines, stealth-oriented gameplay, and a level of historical authenticity that made it stand out from the crowd. As a fan, I can’t help but appreciate its impact on the genre.

1) However, as COD continued to advance, MOH seemed to recede into obscurity. What factors led to this occurrence? And, above all, was any part of COD’s triumph attributed to the groundwork laid by MOH?

The foundation of the MOH (Medal of Honor) can be traced back to the heart of Hollywood. Following the triumph of “Saving Private Ryan,” filmmaker Steven Spielberg endeavored to develop a game capturing the raw passion and feelings of World War II.

1999 saw the introduction of MOH (Medal of Honor) on PlayStation, which stood out among shooter games by prioritizing historical accuracy and narrative. Unlike other first-person shooter games from that time, such as Wolfenstein, this game placed less emphasis on high-octane action and more on creating an authentic soldier experience for the players.

Right from the start, the MOH (Medal of Honor) had its unique identity. Titles such as Medal of Honor: Allied Assault and Frontline combined classic first-person shooter mechanics with undercover operation-like missions. The portrayal of surviving the war was made to feel both realistic and cinematic.

It wasn’t long before we found Call of Duty appearing in 2003. What some players may not know is that Call of Duty originated from the team behind Medal of Honor: Allied Assault. After completing that game, a team of developers departed to establish Infinity Ward and leveraged their experience from MOH to reach new pinnacles.

Activision recognized the game’s potential and wholeheartedly supported its launch, nicknaming it the “MOH Killer” within the company. Call of Duty (COD) took the squad-based combat from Medal of Honor (MOH), intensifying the experience by placing players in massive battles alongside AI teammates, making them feel like they were part of a larger war effort. It threw you into the deep end without much guidance to swim.

As a gamer, I found that Call of Duty (COD) knew its niche and excelled in it, while Medal of Honor (MOH) struggled to find its footing. It wasn’t about the series losing ground; rather, MOH seemed to overreach by trying too hard to emulate COD’s fast-paced, action-packed style. Instead of focusing on improving its core strengths, stealth and tactical gameplay, it ventured into territories that didn’t truly align with its identity.

By the time Call of Duty 2 and Modern Warfare revolutionized the genre, MOH was already playing catch-up, trying to adapt and evolve to keep pace with the shifting landscape of gaming.

During the latter part of the 2000s, there was a significant increase in the number of World War II-themed shooting games. Battlefield continued to broaden its scope, Brothers in Arms found a specific market, and Call of Duty ruled the sales rankings.

In 2010, Electronic Arts (EA) endeavored to update the Medal of Honor series (MOH), but this effort was too delayed and failed to leave a lasting impression. Instead of seeing it as an evolution of their beloved franchise, players perceived it as a poor imitation of Call of Duty (COD). This sparked discussions about who copied whom, which subsequently broadened the debate.

2012 marked the end for this series as “Medal of Honor: Warfighter” delivered the decisive blow. The game received unfavorable reviews, struggled with sales, and Electronic Arts’ focus on Battlefield led to the temporary retirement of this franchise from active development.

However, Electronic Arts (EA) attempted to resurrect the series in 2020 with Medal of Honor: Above and Beyond, a title exclusively for virtual reality developed by Respawn Entertainment. It successfully captured the World War II experience, but it encountered technical issues, appealed primarily to a specific audience, and failed to make a significant impact.

After the latest incident, Electronic Arts (EA) decided to fully commit to Battlefield, effectively ending their focus on Medal of Honor (MOH). What was once the most popular game, has now become something nostalgic that we often reminisce about.

Currently, Call of Duty (COD) dominates the gaming scene, but it’s important to acknowledge that much of its success is built on the groundwork established by Medal of Honor (MOH). Although MOH may no longer be at the forefront, its influence persists in COD. This is evident in how often COD revisits World War II settings and incorporates classic gameplay mechanics from MOH.

Primarily, the spirit of MOH continues through Respawn Entertainment, a studio overseen by ex-Infinity Ward developers now under EA, who were once associated with MOH.

At this point, it’s fair to say that Medal of Honor walked so Call of Duty could run.

While COD is still sprinting, some players should never forget where it all started.

Read More

2025-03-14 08:42