Actors Yami Gautam and Emraan Hashmi are preparing for a courtroom drama centered around the influential 1985 case of Shah Bano vs. Ahmed Khan. According to Hindustan Times, Yami Gautam, who takes on the role of Shah Bano, and Emraan Hashmi, whose character is modeled after her ex-husband Ahmed Khan, have finished filming. Continue reading below for more details about the 1985 Shah Bano case.
All you need to know about Shah Bano Case
The 1985 Shah Bano case marked a significant milestone in India’s legal chronicles. It sparked intricate debates concerning how a secular administration should manage religious affairs, the collision between religious dogmas and individual liberties within a democratic framework, and the necessity to reassess Muslim personal laws from an equality-in-gender perspective.
In the month of April, 1978, Shah Bano petitioned a court in Indore for financial assistance from her ex-husband, Mohammed Ahmad Khan, a well-known lawyer. This couple had been married since 1932 and were blessed with five children: three sons and two daughters.
As a dedicated follower, I based my petition on Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which obligates a man to offer financial support to his ex-wife, should she lack the means to sustain herself independently after our marriage has ended.
Instead, Khan disputed Shah Bano’s entitlement by stating that, according to Muslim Personal Law, his duty for financial assistance was limited solely to the iddat period.
The term ‘Iddat’ signifies a specific time frame, usually around three months, that a woman must abide by following a divorce or her spouse’s passing, before she may remarry again.
Khan’s viewpoint was supported by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, who asserted that it is inappropriate for the judicial system to meddle in issues regulated by Muslim Personal Law.
As a fervent devotee, I understand that the governing body asserted that abiding by their proposed action would contravene the principles established by The Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act of 1937. This Act dictates that matters concerning divorce, alimony, and other family-related aspects must be handled in compliance with Islamic law, or Shariat.
Following comprehensive trials, it was the Supreme Court of India that rendered its judgment on the matter in 1985. A significant question at hand was whether the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) of 1973, a law applicable to all Indian citizens regardless of faith, could be implemented under these specific circumstances.
Previously, the High Court had ordered maintenance for Shah Bano under the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). This decision was subsequently upheld by then Chief Justice Y.V. Chandrachud, and even more so, the Supreme Court augmented the initial maintenance amount that was due to her.
This ruling marked a significant milestone in Indian legal history, as it transcended the conventional method of resolving similar cases exclusively using religious-based personal laws.
The decision likewise highlighted the significance of implementing a Uniform Civil Code, underscoring the value of gender equity and uniformity across issues concerning religious observances and individual liberties.
Read More
- Ludus promo codes (April 2025)
- Cookie Run Kingdom: Shadow Milk Cookie Toppings and Beascuits guide
- ZEREBRO PREDICTION. ZEREBRO cryptocurrency
- Mini Heroes Magic Throne tier list
- DEEP PREDICTION. DEEP cryptocurrency
- Grimguard Tactics tier list – Ranking the main classes
- Fortress Saga tier list – Ranking every hero
- Seven Deadly Sins Idle tier list and a reroll guide
- Maiden Academy tier list
- Best teams for Seven Deadly Sins Idle
2025-04-23 09:39