A Spokesperson For Blake Lively Drops Claim About Justin Baldoni Wanting To ‘Scorch Earth’ As Mess Of Tangled Lawsuits Become More Intertwined

by

In the ongoing legal dispute about the novel “It Ends With Us”, a fresh twist has emerged. After Justin Baldoni sued The New York Times following their publication of an article about Blake Lively’s complaint against the director, the newspaper has now sought dismissal from the lawsuit. Moreover, a representative for Blake Lively has supported The New York Times’ decision, stating that Justin Baldoni and his team have employed a strategic social media campaign to destroy opponents.

Following the submission of a motion to dismiss, I, as a movie critic, find myself commenting on Blake Lively’s response to J.R. Baldoni’s lawsuit. In an interview with Deadline, a spokesperson for Lively characterized Baldoni’s legal document as a “publicity stunt,” asserting that it has no place in a court of law. The representative further expressed satisfaction at the publication’s decision to move towards dismissal, stating that this action aligns with their commitment to truth and justice.

For quite some time, Baldoni encouraged men to heed women’s voices and trust their stories. However, when a woman voiced her concerns about his actions, both Baldoni and his wealthy supporter Steve Sorowitz employed a harsh social media strategy aimed at discrediting and damaging her, as well as the journalists reporting on it. These aggressive tactics won’t hold up in court, and everyone should recognize their baseless accusations for what they are.

The explanation provided by Danielle Rhoades Ha, Senior Vice President of External Communications at The New York Times, clarifies their stance on a particular case. She stated that this case should not have been filed against The New York Times in the first place.

Based on our actions, it’s clear that the lawsuit against The New York Times was unwarranted. Blake Lively expressed significant issues regarding her treatment on set and post-movie release, which we promptly reported to the public. In line with journalistic responsibilities, we disclosed the complaint she filed with the California Civil Rights Department.

Besides clarifying her rationale behind crafting the story, she also articulated why Baldoni’s lawsuit won’t suppress them, expressing it as: “She made clear why they remain undaunted by Baldoni’s lawsuit.

Mr. Baldoni’s ill-conceived crusade against The Times, which includes challenging our integrity, trying to tarnish our journalism, and initiating a groundless lawsuit, won’t succeed in muting us.

Significantly, The Times’ recent action and Lively’s representative’s statement occurred approximately a month following an adjustment in Baldoni’s team’s case. They now allege that the actress and the magazine had been conspiring and preparing this article for publication several months prior to its release.

Currently, The New York Times is seeking dismissal from the case. In a document accompanying this motion (as reported by Deadline), the newspaper provided an explanation for their request.

In the heat of their ongoing disagreement with Lively, the Wayfarer Parties attempt to involve The Times in their broader conflict. However, what The Times stands accused of specifically is merely gathering news and publishing an article and video regarding the Wayfarer-Lively dispute.

This action further complicates the intricate legal predicament arising from multiple interconnected lawsuits stemming from the controversy surrounding the creation and distribution of “It Ends With Us“. Besides taking legal action against the NYT, Baldoni is also pursuing Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds. His attorney has been vocal about their aggressive approach towards managing these court cases.

As a supporter, I’m sharing that the actress involved in “Gossip Girl” is taking legal action against Baldoni. More recently, on February 28, a judge made a partial decision, granting her access to certain parts of Baldoni’s phone records while denying other requests as “overly intrusive,” according to Variety.

In summary, much like a lawyer forecasted, the dispute between Lively and Baldoni is becoming increasingly contentious with each new development regarding the progression of their interconnected lawsuits. Consequently, as further information emerges, such as The New York Times’ involvement in the legal struggle, we will continue to provide updates on this ongoing saga.

Read More

2025-03-01 20:08