Adam McKay Thinks ‘Wicked’ Could Be Banned For Being So “Radical”

by

As a long-time observer of societal trends and a passionate advocate for truth and justice, I wholeheartedly agree with Adam McKay’s assessment of Wicked as one of the most radical big studio Hollywood movies ever made. In my humble opinion, this film is a much-needed wake-up call in these trying times when misinformation and polarization seem to be on the rise.

Adam McKay, director of both The Big Short and Don’t Look Up, considers Wicked as “one of the most groundbreaking big studio Hollywood films ever produced.” He further commented that, considering the current trajectory of America, it would not surprise him if this movie were banned within 3-5 years.

On a fresh wave of posts on the revamped platform, once known as Twitter and now called X, the politically engaged and dynamic director expressed his astonishment regarding the stark contrast between the movie’s theme and its timely release, highlighting several reasons for his surprise.

To put it simply, McKay pointed out that “America has never been more conservative and influenced by propaganda.” It’s tough to dispute this claim, which might lead to an intriguing development for the movie’s plotline in the future.

Why Does Adam McKay Think ‘Wicked’ Could Be Banned Soon?

The core narrative in the musical “Wicked” offers a profoundly unconventional perspective. It reinterprets the tale of the Wicked Witch of the West, originally depicted in L. Frank Baum’s “Land of Oz” novels, serving as inspiration for the iconic film “The Wizard of Oz.” In his novel “Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West,” Gregory Macguire portrays Elphaba as a character widely misunderstood, who exhibits remarkable courage in challenging a dictatorial figure reminiscent of the Wizard (portrayed by Jeff Goldblum in the movie adaptation).

According to an interview with the novelist in 2022, the Denver Gazette described “Wicked” as a warning story about how societies can label those who don’t fit the norm as wicked. The author intentionally incorporated themes of terrorism, propaganda, and political corruption into the book, as he shared in a 2008 interview with Australian publication The Age, where he stated that he aimed to scrutinize the language and propaganda employed to mobilize violence against individuals or minorities who were against the war through “Wicked.

The book’s contemplation on good versus evil, and how people can be influenced to act against their self-interest and human welfare, seems perfectly suited to ignite the creative passion of a director like McKay, who consistently pushes beyond expectations in his work to reflect societal truths.

In a straightforward and engaging manner, the author stated, “From a narrative perspective, Wicked Part 1 stands out as one of the most groundbreaking big studio Hollywood films ever produced.” He further noted that while “Part 2 leans more towards the norm … Part 1 boldly explores the theme of radicalization in the face of ambition, fascism, and propaganda.” With the movie split into two parts, it’s hoped that some of its daring messages will endure.

Additionally, he noted that his “daughter shared with me her opinion that the book is thrilling and deserves attention,” which I hope the director will share in the future as well. Considering the current situation of America (and numerous regions worldwide), it seems increasingly crucial for people to listen to the message delivered by a movie or novel like Wicked.

While McKay suggests it might be prohibited, that doesn’t necessarily mean it will. He clarifies this point in his discussion. However, it serves as a crucial reminder for those who believe doing nothing while the world slips deeper into misinformation and division is a viable solution.

Read More

2024-12-27 04:01