Initially appearing on-screen can make it tough to conceive characters differently, but the fact remains that numerous cultural icons nearly bore no resemblance to their original forms. Ranging from early sketches to casting choices, significant aspects from many beloved movies were just a hair’s breadth away from having a drastically different look.
As a devoted fan, I can’t help but marvel at the intricate journeys that iconic movie and TV characters have taken, filled with creative clashes, lengthy production phases, technological advancements, script alterations, and even test marketing outcomes. It’s fascinating to think about how different these instantly recognizable figures might have been if their development hadn’t unfolded as it did, potentially vanishing from the pop culture landscape swiftly. Let’s revisit some of these alternate paths.
Ursula (The Little Mermaid)
The sea witch character named Ursula, who appeared in Disney’s “The Little Mermaid” in 1989, is considered one of the most memorable villains ever created by Disney. Her undulating tentacles and eerie, purplish, undead-like appearance give her a touch of unease without crossing into truly terrifying territory for family-friendly content. However, the original concept for Ursula was to resemble a lionfish, complete with multiple fins protruding from her body.
her current iconic appearance was influenced by the drag queen Divine. Who would have thought “The Little Mermaid” and “Pink Flamingos” shared such a connection?
Russ Cargill (The Simpsons Movie)
In the 2007 film “The Simpsons Movie,” Russ Cargill was the sole original character introduced, and the creative team found it challenging to find a suitable villain who would seamlessly fit with the cherished personalities within the franchise. Initially, Cargill was envisioned as an older EPA agent, slightly overweight, balding, and fond of sweaters, bearing a resemblance to the character Gil from the TV show rather than the quick-witted government official that appeared in the film. However, just before the animation phase neared completion, the team altered his character to better align with the movie’s dynamic.
As a gamer, I was caught off guard by the sudden change in the character designs for “The Simpsons Movie”. Originally, there was going to be a Burger King tie-in, but they had already unveiled the initial character designs before realizing that Cargill would undergo a makeover. So, unfortunately, any kid eager for a new toy of the latest Simpsons character ended up with the original design instead. If you watch the deleted scenes and commentary track on the DVD, you’ll get more insights into how Cargill evolved and catch a glimpse of the old Russ in action.
Arthur Read (Arthur)
In the past, Arthur wasn’t merely a popular internet joke – he was the main character in a collection of children’s books and an enchanting PBS show. If you’ve ever pondered why Arthur the Aardvark doesn’t resemble a real aardvark (or any other creature, for that matter), it’s because author Marc Brown has gradually changed Arthur’s appearance over time.
1976 saw the initial sketch of the character resembling an aardvark, characterized by a long snout and melancholic eyes. As Brown elaborated in his blog, he progressively humanized the figure, believing it to be more identifiable for children. Whether the “Arthur’s fist” meme would have flourished with the original drawing remains unknown.
Batman
As a devoted Batman fan, it’s widely acknowledged that Bob Kane and Bill Finger are the acknowledged creators of the iconic superhero. However, Frank D. Foster II asserts he was the one who truly brought him to life. In a 1975 interview with an attorney (as shared in Original Batman), Foster reminisced about the genesis of the idea, saying, “In those days, and even now, most comic strips featured heroes flying through the sky during the day, doing good deeds… I thought, why not have a hero do good at night? And thus, the concept of a dark knight was born.
According to Foster, he created the initial design for Batman and met with DC Comics about his ideas in 1937. After these discussions, he handed over his initial sketches to the company. However, as Foster tells it, DC returned his drawings, stating they wouldn’t be using his work. It was in “Detective Comics #27” that Batman first appeared in 1937. Despite having no resources to take legal action, Foster did not sue, leaving the story of Batman’s creation partially unknown and shrouded in mystery.
Elsa (Frozen)
Before Idina Menzel voiced the icy-powered Princess Elsa in the blockbuster movie “Frozen” by Disney, she underwent several transformations before making it to the screen.
Initially, the character Elsa was intended to be cold-hearted due to being jilted at the altar, mirroring the storyline of “The Snow Queen” by Hans Christian Andersen. Early designs for Elsa were inspired by Bette Midler, and Megan Mullally was set to voice the villain. However, the studio altered their plans – a change that led to one of their most successful films yet, earning over a billion dollars globally.
Buzz Lightyear (Toy Story)
Imagining “Toy Story” as it first was, Pixar might not have flourished as we know it today. Originally, Woody was envisioned as a large ventriloquist’s doll, which was later transformed into a stuffed cowboy, likely due to the inherent creepiness of ventriloquist dolls. Initial concept art depicted Buzz as a sleek ’50s astronaut with less warmth and character compared to the final version. Interestingly, Woody was significantly larger than Buzz back then, and he certainly wasn’t the most endearing character.
As reported in an interview titled “Black Friday: An Unexplored Toy Story”, John Lasseter, the director, aimed for the film to be bold with a touch of darkness. However, upon watching the initial half of the movie, he realized it was disastrous; his words were, “It was a tale brimming with the most miserable, cruel characters.” With merely two weeks at their disposal, the Pixar team strived to rectify the story, and subsequently, that period marked the beginning of an animation legacy.
Kermit the Frog (The Muppets)
Initially, Kermit the Frog emerged as a character with quite a different demeanor than we’re familiar with today, well before Miss Piggy and the rest of the Muppets troupe made their debut. Jim Henson, the mastermind behind the Muppets, initially designed Kermit and another puppet to star in a series of amusing Wilkins Coffee advertisements.
Hey there! Check out that picture on the left? It’s my favorite Muppet, Kermit, pulling the lever on an electric chair. Poor guy next to him didn’t take a sip from Wilkins, so he was out. Seems like all those ads show Kermit causing harm, or worse, murder. But thankfully, over time, Henson managed to keep Kermit’s voice familiar while also giving him more human traits. The once seemingly sociopathic frog is now a bit more relatable!
The Wicked Witch of the West (The Wizard of Oz)
In a new take, we can say that Margaret Hamilton’s portrayal of the Wicked Witch of the West in “The Wizard of Oz” is one of the most iconic villain characters ever; to this day, her depiction has boosted the demand for green face paint during Halloween. However, according to author Frank L. Baum, the witch was imagined differently.
Despite being a witch, she didn’t sport green skin but rather adorned three pigtails – a sign that even in the supernatural realm, one can enjoy hair styling. She was an unconventional older woman with an oversized hat and a skirt decorated with moons and frogs, resembling a creative art teacher more than a symbol of malevolence. As Baum described, she only had one eye, sometimes depicted as wearing an eyepatch or bearing a single cyclops eyeball in the middle of her forehead. Interestingly, this witch was never pictured with a broom; instead, she carried an umbrella – perhaps foreshadowing that Mary Poppins might secretly be a witch?
Despite deviating significantly from Baum’s original conception, the film portrayal of the Witch with her green skin, crooked nose, and black hat has become an iconic image that no umbrella-carrying elderly woman in a frog dress could aspire to replicate.
Yautja (Predator)
In the 20th century, The Predator stands out among well-known movie monsters, yet its appearance was nearly transformed drastically. Originally, Jean-Claude Van Damme was chosen to portray the character, and a costume tailored for him was designed. However, the creature appeared leaner, necessitating leg extensions and an extra leg joint. In prototype views, this design looked satisfactory, but it severely hampered JCVD’s ability to deliver expressive acting performances.
Additionally, as anticipated, it failed to function as intended and struggled in the jungle setting. JCVD had expected to display his martial arts skills, but found himself confined and deeply disliked the suit, particularly the cumbersome headpiece. He chose to abandon the project, which halted production temporarily. To resolve this issue, they enlisted the help of renowned special effects artist Stan Winston, who had previously designed the T-800 from “The Terminator” film.
Winston tailored the suit’s design by considering Kevin Peter Hall’s required movements and the environment where the suit would operate. Under the pressure of time, as each production day delayed meant additional costs, he developed a unique design that eventually graced the movie, giving birth to a fearsome creature that left an unforgettable mark on popular culture.
Xenomorph (Alien)
Among all movie monsters conjured up in our nightmares, maybe none stirs fear quite like the Xenomorph from the “Alien” series. Given that the movie leans more towards horror than science fiction, the creature isn’t heavily featured on screen, preferring to lurk in the shadows and gradually unveil itself – a technique reminiscent of “Jaws,” and echoing the same effect for “Alien.” However, as the central figure of the film, it was crucial that the monster be truly terrifying.
Before anyone considered seeking the assistance of Swiss artist H.R. Giger, pre-production stages led to several unconventional designs, some of which were downright amusing but none more so than a concept concocted by Robert Aldrich, originally assigned as director. During an interview on “WTF with Marc Maron” podcast, producer Walter Hill revealed that Aldrich had a vision, and he believed the film’s success or failure hinged on the creature design.
Aldrich proposed an unusual plan: “We need something exceptional,” he suggested spontaneously, “perhaps we could train an orangutan and shave it, just to get a glimpse of it occasionally.” Luckily, this idea didn’t catch on, and instead, Giger designed one of cinema’s most iconic monsters. At first, Giger’s design included eyes for the Xenomorph, but this too was discarded in favor of the final design.
Han Solo and Chewbacca (Star Wars)
George Lucas, the director of “Star Wars,” originally envisioned a very different movie compared to what we eventually saw. To bring his ideas to life, he collaborated with acclaimed artist Ralph McQuarrie who helped shape the appearance of various elements such as planets, weapons, characters, and spaceships. Some of McQuarrie’s designs made it into the final film, while others underwent slight adjustments.
In the 1977 film, Chewbacca’s design, which was based on Lucas’ dog Indiana and McQuarrie’s concept art, was not included. Instead, what we recognize as our beloved Chewbacca, portrayed by Peter Mayhew, was quite different. McQuarrie’s original idea presented a more intimidating figure with large eyes, an indistinct nose, a smaller mouth, protruding ears, and carrying a blaster and wearing armor. This version of Chewbacca was less friendly and more frightening compared to the one we know today.
In an alternate concept for Han Solo, Lucas envisioned him as a Yourellian alien, slimy and green-skinned, instead of the human-like character we know today. This idea was sketched out in Lucas’ 1974 draft script, which deviated significantly from the final movie “Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope.” Neither version made it into the film, but aspects of both have been incorporated into the franchise. The comic series “The Star Wars” follows Lucas’ original draft, while the design of Chewbacca by McQuarrie served as inspiration for the appearance of Zeb Orrelios in the show “Star Wars Rebels.
Dorothy Gale (The Wizard of Oz)
Dorothy Gale, portrayed by Judy Garland in “The Wizard of Oz,” is one of the most cherished characters in cinematic history. The movie has stood the test of time since it paved the way for Technicolor films in 1939, and despite numerous sequels, adaptations, and reimaginings, Garland’s interpretation remains unparalleled. Her character is easily recognizable with her classic attire – a blue dress, white blouse, and braided pigtails tied with blue ribbons – which beautifully complements her reddish-brown hair.
As a devoted admirer, I’d like to emphasize the significance of the on-screen appearance because the original concept envisioned striking differences that almost transformed the character into someone unfamiliar. To portray Dorothy, she was heavily made up and given a more glamorous look than a young girl from Kansas in the 1930s would typically have. This transformation was achieved with a blonde wig, and it was with this image that filming began in 1938.
During a halt in filming due to an injury on set and a cast replacement, the original look for Dorothy didn’t prevail. A new director, George Cukor, was appointed temporarily, and he felt that Dorothy should appear less like a Hollywood starlet and more as a girl from Kansas. Therefore, he discarded the blonde wig, reduced her makeup significantly, and allowed Judy Garland’s natural hair to grow out. The movie might have been successful without this change, but it’s challenging to envision Dorothy as a blonde, heavily made-up character.
Gaston (Beauty and the Beast)
In “Beauty and the Beast,” the characters named Beauty and the Beast are central, but it’s the character of Gaston (portrayed by Richard White) who stands out as the primary antagonist. He persistently pursues Belle, despite her clear disinterest, which eventually leads him to clash with the Beast. Ultimately, this confrontation results in Gaston’s downfall. Throughout the film, Gaston is depicted as a muscular, nature-loving, arrogant individual who prioritizes himself above all else. He views Belle not as a person he should win over, but as a possession.
1991’s movie adaptation draws inspiration from an 18th-century French folktale for its character design, particularly evident in Gaston’s case. Initially conceptualized by artist Andreas Deja, Gaston was not the rugged outdoorsman we see in the final film; instead, he embodied the opulent lifestyle of a 18th-century French aristocrat. In his blog post, Deja elaborated that Gaston was already self-absorbed and arrogant, but not the rough-and-tumble type portrayed in the finished product. Instead, this character reveled in luxury, sporting expensive clothing, employing servants, and never lifting a finger to work. In essence, he resembled a young Marlon Brando.
In the original concept for Gaston, he sported a white powdered wig, a blue coat, and other accessories typical of his era. However, these details were changed during production, and the animators opted for the version of Gaston seen in the film instead. Deja’s initial idea was closer to the fairy tale image, but the final appearance of Gaston suits the movie perfectly.
Ellen Ripley (Alien)
In the major part of the 20th century, action films were mostly led by male characters rather than females. Initially, when creating the script for “Alien”, it was intended to have the Ripley character be a man. However, changing her gender resulted in one of the most powerful female leads in science fiction. Sigourney Weaver’s portrayal of Ellen Ripley displays strength, intelligence, unyielding determination, and ultimately, emerges as the film’s heroine.
In an interview with the Los Angeles Times (as reported by CBR), director Ridley Scott revealed that he originally intended for the character of Ripley to be male. However, this idea apparently came from Alan Ladd Jr., then president of 20th Century Fox. Ladd posed the question, “Why can’t Ripley be a woman?”, which took Scott by surprise. He thought, “Why not? It’s a new perspective.”, and so they proceeded with the change.
One significant factor that contributed to the enduring appeal of “Alien,” upon its debut in 1979, was the portrayal of a woman as the main character. While it wasn’t entirely unprecedented, women in ’70s cinema were typically relegated to roles in Blaxploitation films or romantic comedies. However, the sci-fi genre stood apart: Princess Leia (played by Carrie Fisher) from “Star Wars” had already broken new ground, setting a stage for Ripley, making it more common to see strong female action heroes.
Genie (Aladdin)
Crafting characters for any Disney animated feature is a challenging task, and the team behind “Aladdin” experimented with numerous iterations while shaping the film’s beloved characters. It seems that the character who underwent the most transformations during development was none other than the Genie (originally voiced by Robin Williams). Initially, the Genie had a few unconventional designs, including one where he was green and somewhat plump, but far from the humorous look that eventually graced the screen.
In a different interpretation of the Genie character from Aladdin (1992), he was portrayed without facial hair, sporting a small ponytail, and resembling an infant in a diaper. This design might have fit well within a Disney film like “The Black Cauldron,” but it wasn’t the style that made the impact of Aladdin in 1992. Another design featured horns, a feathered hat, a Van Dyke beard without the mustache, and clawed fingers. Although distinct, this appearance is closest to the one seen in the actual movie.
In September 1990, Eric Goldberg was brought on board for the development of the Genie character. His early concepts were quite unique, as he described him as a whirl of smoke with a nose and eyes. This wasn’t much to work with for the animators, but luckily they envisioned a more friendly-looking, blue Genie, which is the one we see in the movie “Aladdin.
Snow White (Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs)
Making “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” was a risky venture for Walt Disney since it was his debut full-length animated film. He had no guarantee that it would succeed, as producing the movie demanded a considerable amount of time and funds, particularly in designing the characters. However, the storyline for the 1937 movie wasn’t completely original; instead, it was based on the 1812 fairy tale “Snow White” by the Brothers Grimm.
The initial sketches served as a guide for the artists on how to depict the characters, but they didn’t suit Disney’s standards. Designing Snow White was particularly difficult because Disney animators weren’t familiar with animating human women. Instead of resembling Snow White, the early designs looked more like Olive Oil due to their exaggerated eyes and diminutive features.
In some drawings, hair was an aspect that required attention, as it showcased red and blonde hairstyles in various fashions. A more detailed sketch by Grim Natwick incorporated numerous features later utilized in the finished product. However, Disney perceived her design as too reminiscent of Betty Boop and overly provocative, which led the animators to seek inspiration from 14-year-old Marjorie Champion for Snow White’s final appearance, as displayed in the movie.
Richard (The Amazing World of Gumball)
The Incredible World of Gumball” is often hailed as one of Cartoon Network’s finest series ever made, earning respect for its unique blend of animation techniques with live-action elements in its design. Every frame is a masterpiece, featuring adorable, expressive characters that are thoughtfully crafted.
One primary character, Richard Watterson, might not be the sharpest tool in the shed, but he’s a devoted father who tirelessly looks after his loved ones – and just happens to look like an endearing pink rabbit instead. This was quite different from Ben Bocquelet’s initial vision for Richard when creating “The Amazing World of Gumball”. Originally, Richard was envisioned as a blue dog with a slimmer build, and in some early sketches, he wore glasses. The canine version of Richard had long, sagging ears similar to Homer Simpson’s, and facial stubble. There is very little about the dog character that reflects Richard, except for wearing a collar and tie.
It’s uncertain why Bocquelet shifted away from the blue-dog concept for the character, but given their stark differences, it seems improbable to interchange their designs. This sentiment is shared by viewers, as one fan on the “The Amazing World of Gumball” Fandom page commented, “If Richard had been a blue dog, we’d have an entirely different character than the one we know today.
Maui (Moana)
In some instances, subtly altering a character’s portrayal can significantly impact the overall result, and this is particularly noticeable with the character Maui from “Moana”. The role was given voice by Dwayne Johnson, and the early concept sketches for Maui bore a striking resemblance to his voice actor. He’s bald, covered in tattoos from head to toe. Although Johnson doesn’t have as many tattoos, it’s clear that there’s at least a hint of similarity between the character and the man who gives him life in the film.
In numerous depictions of Maui, elements from Polynesian culture are present, such as earring designs, necklace styles, and clothing patterns. One illustration even shows him wearing a necklace adorned with shark teeth, a detail that found its way into the movie. However, it’s important to note that his facial structure in the film is rounder compared to traditional depictions, and his hair is long, curly, and majestic, unlike some more simplified illustrations.
In the movie, the hairstyle was added later, and at times, he sports a bun-like style called a topknot. Interestingly, in the live-action version of “Moana,” Johnson will need to wear a substantial wig that may prove unwieldy, as it is necessary for him to resemble Maui’s final design more closely. If they had opted for a bald Maui, Johnson could have easily appeared without any additional clothing and just worn a grass skirt instead.
WALL-E (WALL-E)
In 2008’s “WALL-E”, the animators beautifully transformed the setting into a desolate trash-filled world, but it was WALL-E, our main character, who truly made the film shine. With minimal dialogue, WALL-E stands out as one of the most emotive and impactful characters in animation, primarily through his movements. The way he conveys emotions is largely done through his eyes, which can reflect a range of feelings from joy and affection to fear and disbelief.
Before the animation process started, Pixar made numerous design adjustments for movies like “WALL-E”, and this was no exception with its characters. Many ideas emerged regarding WALL-E’s role in managing trash. In one sketch, he appeared overly similar to a bin with eyes, while in others, his appearance didn’t convey any emotions at all. However, the final focus was on his expressive eyes, which director and lead artist Andrew Stanton spent considerable time refining to make them perfect.
Through their tireless passion for their work, the artists transformed WALL-E into a compassionate character. The initial concept art fell short of what they ultimately achieved by refining WALL-E’s appearance to a point where audiences could connect emotionally with him on a profound level. Visualizing the movie with the original design on the left would reveal how ineffective that portrayal might have been.
Timon and Pumbaa (The Lion King)
The Lion King” is a retelling of William Shakespeare’s play “Hamlet,” with animal characters standing in for the human ones. For instance, Timon and Pumbaa assume the roles of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, providing comic relief throughout the movie. The creators certainly enjoyed developing these characters in their warthog and meerkat forms, and they are undeniably two of the most popular figures from this series.
In contrast to the 2019 CGI version, the original 1994 animated “The Lion King” portrayed its creatures in a more cartoony style, with exaggerated features. However, during the film’s initial design process, there were thoughts about presenting animals in a more realistic manner. Interestingly, Timon and Pumbaa originally resembled their real-life counterparts, a warthog and a meerkat, respectively.
As the movie progressed, the original concept was abandoned in favor of the over-the-top characters depicted in the film. However, certain aspects remained consistent, such as the relative sizes of the duo and Timon’s ability to emit an unpleasant odor across the Serengeti. Some illustrations even resemble Eeyore from “Winnie the Pooh” more than a realistic warthog, suggesting that it was wise to discard these ideas. Apart from shortening his snout and making his eyes more expressive, Timon’s overall appearance didn’t undergo significant changes.
Hades (Hercules)
In 1997, the Disney animators who brought “Hercules” to life on screen drew inspiration from ancient Greek artwork for a unique visual style unlike any other film produced by the studio. This approach proved effective and resulted in well-designed characters, although it seems that Hades, voiced by James Woods, was particularly challenging to perfect his appearance.
The ultimate portrayal shows Hades, the deity of the Underworld, having a blue complexion and flaming tresses. These flaming strands serve to convey his feelings, and when Hades gets enraged, he figuratively lets out a tempestuous outburst by blowing off steam, which wouldn’t have been achievable through the diverse ideas that surfaced during character creation. As detailed in “The Art of Hercules — The Chaos of Creation” art book, Hades was initially envisioned as a feminine take on the traditional Satan figure from Christian lore.
A fresh take on depicting Hades featured fiery hair, giving him a more skeletal, simplified appearance reminiscent of figures on ancient Greek vases. Unconventional renditions were also seen in Cerberus’ design, the three-headed dog guarding the Underworld, and monsters in the film that deviated significantly from traditional sketches. However, it seems Hades is the character from “Hercules” who is furthest removed from the initial conceptualization.
E.T. (E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial)
The heartwarming film “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial” is a cherished family favorite today, but its origins were quite different. At first, director Steven Spielberg intended to make a horror sequel to “Close Encounters of the Third Kind.” Initially titled “Night Skies,” this concept was abandoned in favor of the movie that eventually hit theaters in 1982. During the development stage, though, Spielberg collaborated with special effects artist Rick Baker on the design of the alien character.
In a different phrasing: Baker designed some genuinely frightening creatures that ultimately didn’t fit into the final movie. However, numerous of his concepts were later incorporated into different productions, and his work played a significant role in shaping E.T. Subsequently, Spielberg brought on Ed Verreaux to develop the character design. He presented an unusual idea using images of babies with Einstein’s and Sandburg’s eyes superimposed onto their faces. Verreaux utilized this concept and produced several preliminary sketches.
In Baker’s designs, certain features remained such as glowing fingertips, big eyes, and an elongated neck. Spielberg aimed for a character that wouldn’t scare kids too much, so he worked diligently to perfect the alien’s appearance. Baker showcased his sketches on X (previously known as Twitter), and while there are similarities, it’s tough to fathom Drew Barrymore not yelling even louder if she’d run into the creature depicted on the left.
Darth Maul (Star Wars: Episode I — The Phantom Menace)
In the Star Wars universe, I came across some mind-blowing character designs, and Darth Maul, portrayed by Ray Park in “Episode I – The Phantom Menace” (1999), is one of them. This hooded figure with a horned crown, piercing red and yellow eyes, and symmetrical red and black facial markings is far more terrifying than words can express. Maul is an incredibly fearsome character to witness, but it’s fascinating to know he almost looked completely different.
George Lucas collaborated with concept artist Iain McCaig to develop the character’s appearance. He handed over the script, which requested a “terror from your deepest fears.” When McCaig showed his initial Darth Maul design to Lucas, the director was shocked and closed the book abruptly. He asked McCaig (through StarWars.com), “Give me something less frightening,” leading to the visage that appeared in the movie. It’s not hard to understand why Lucas reacted that way, as McCaig’s original design is quite disturbing to behold.
In a different rendition, Maul is depicted with pale-blueish skin and fiery red dreadlocks. His eyes are recessed, dark, but they emit a faint glimmer that catches the eye of an observer. Contrasting McCaig’s portrayal, Maul might have been mere footnote in the “Star Wars” universe, but instead, he has become one of its most visually striking characters. The affection for Maul among fans was so profound that he was resurrected, yet it seems doubtful anyone would long to witness the unattractive face on the left more than a single time.
Read More
- DEEP PREDICTION. DEEP cryptocurrency
- CRK Boss Rush guide – Best cookies for each stage of the event
- Ludus promo codes (April 2025)
- Summoners Kingdom: Goddess tier list and a reroll guide
- CXT PREDICTION. CXT cryptocurrency
- Castle Duels tier list – Best Legendary and Epic cards
- Mini Heroes Magic Throne tier list
- Maiden Academy tier list
- Kingdom Rush 5: Alliance tier list – Every hero and tower ranked
- Grimguard Tactics tier list – Ranking the main classes
2025-05-15 02:04