Distributor Behind Acclaimed 2024 Horror Film Sues Marketing Partner For Strangest Reason

by

As a seasoned movie critic with over three decades of experience in the industry, I’ve seen my fair share of behind-the-scenes drama that never makes it to the silver screen. The saga of Strange Darling is one for the books – a horror film critically acclaimed yet underperforming at the box office due to alleged shady marketing practices by its distributor.

The critically acclaimed horror movie titled “Strange Darling” has been praised by many as one of the year’s best in the genre, earning positive reviews from critics who recommend watching it without knowing much about the plot to enhance the viewing experience. However, despite buzz within niche horror circles, the film didn’t make a significant impact on a broader scale, mainly reaching fans who had been anticipating its release. As a result, the box office performance was only average.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, Bob Yari’s production company, Magenta Light Productions, has filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court claiming that their marketing partner, Spellbinder, owes them $10 million. This is because Spellbinder allegedly failed to contribute its share of the $2 million spent on marketing an acclaimed horror release.

The lawsuit goes on to say that by June, Spellbinder did not deliver on providing a live dashboard on what they were spending on marketing, something that they were contractually obligated to do. The lawsuit accuses them of scaling back the marketing and that’s when Magenta demanded invoices to verify every dime that was being spent. Spellbinder ultimately brought in a third party called Myosin to assist with the marketing, which led to more mismanagement of the funds and revealed that Myosin and Spellbinder were linked under the same umbrella. So, to sum, there has been all manner of chaos and arguing behind the scenes.

The ‘Strange Darling’ Marketing Partner Is Accused of Buying Social Media Followers

In the lawsuit, Myosin is mentioned alongside other companies, including Spellbinder. Magenta contends that these entities are essentially owned by the same individual or group, but present themselves separately in order to avoid liability. If true, they would be operating as a unified entity under different names. The lawsuit also states that Sean Clayton founded both businesses, lending credence to this assertion. Regarding the social media following of their film, Magenta claims they found nearly 25,000 of its 27,000 followers were automated accounts, suggesting these followers did not represent an authentic marketing effort with genuine fans.

It seems clear that Spellbinder bought video views from the Plaintiff’s YouTube channel. These videos boast a large number of views, but they have minimal interaction, indicating that these views may be inauthentic. The comments on these YouTube videos appear to be automated. Furthermore, despite amassing millions of views on its top videos, this account has garnered fewer than 500 subscribers.

In its initial release, “Strange Darling” garnered exceptionally positive feedback with a 95% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. However, its performance at the box office was somewhat lackluster, even for an independent niche horror movie. The film premiered on 1,135 screens and earned only $1.1 million. Despite heavy marketing efforts, these returns were not as high as Magenta had anticipated, which indicated that “Strange Darling” would be a box office disappointment. By the end of its run, the movie had made a total of $3.6 million on a production budget of $4 million.

As a dedicated movie enthusiast, I can’t help but feel the disappointment that didn’t seem to find its way into the marketing campaign for JT Mollner’s directorial effort, “Spellbinder.” Star Kyle Gallner and I were vocal advocates for this film on various platforms. If Magenta had been satisfied with the promotion strategies, perhaps more resources could have been allocated towards our efforts to create hype around the movie, which also features Willa Fitzgerald. We became our own marketing force, striving to generate a groundswell of interest in the film. Despite generating some buzz among smaller circles, it never managed to break out, a fact that might suggest Magenta’s lawsuit holds some merit. Regrettably, Spellbinder and Myosin have yet to address Magenta’s lawsuit.

Read More

2024-12-13 16:02