Gamers Share Why They Leave Negative Reviews After Hundreds of Hours in a Game. Do They Really Dislike It?

by

As a seasoned gamer with decades of experience under my belt, I must say that the phenomenon of investing hundreds of hours into a game only to give it a negative review is something I find myself pondering quite frequently. It’s like buying a brand-new car, driving it for a few days, and then realizing it’s not the ride you were hoping for – but instead of trading it in, you decide to drive it across the country.

As a passionate gamer, I often seek out honest opinions when it comes to discovering fresh gaming experiences. Online platforms like Steam have a dedicated review section for each game they offer, and these player-submitted reviews tend to be reliable, offering genuine insights that truly represent what the games are all about.

On numerous instances, gamers within the community often ponder over an anomaly: users who have invested hundreds of hours into a particular game, only to give it a highly negative review on Steam. This leads to curiosity about how such extensive playtime could result in a highly unfavorable rating.

Initially shared on Reddit by the user u/SaveADay89, they posed a question to the community if anyone had invested hundreds of hours into a game without enjoying it, subsequently leaving a critical review on Steam. The user pointed out that many unfavorable reviews for games like Starfield, Diablo 4, and Assassin’s Creed series often cited a lack of content as their main concern.

One common explanation for this peculiar review scenario, as some gamers in the discussion suggest, is due to the sunk cost fallacy when purchasing video games. Essentially, consumers buy a game with a specific price tag, only to find out after several hours of play that it doesn’t meet their expectations. Despite realizing this, they continue playing because they have already invested money into it – a classic example of the sunk cost fallacy. Additionally, players often set unrealistic expectations for upcoming games based on early trailers and marketing materials, which can lead to disappointment when the final product turns out to be different from what was initially expected.

It was mentioned by another player that multiplayer games like Rainbow Six Siege often start off strong with high-quality gameplay but may deteriorate over time, leading to numerous unfavorable reviews despite players having invested considerable time into the game.

Many people expressed similar feelings, stating that when dealing with such situations, gamers often hold onto optimism about the improvement of these games. They gradually invest additional time, sometimes accumulating far more playtime than their initial expectation.

Despite numerous games potentially finding themselves in similar circumstances, No Man’s Sky stands out as an exceptional illustration of how a game can recover and thrive given enough time and continuous content upgrades. Following a very rocky debut, No Man’s Sky now enjoys mostly positive reviews on Steam. In fact, just last month, No Man’s Sky introduced its Aquarius update, which has left fishing enthusiasts in alien worlds ecstatic with anticipation.

To keep yourself informed about the freshest news and tales from the gaming community, don’t forget to sign up and keep an eye on Gfinity Esports.

READ MORE: You Can Play the Dino Crisis Remake Right Now

Read More

2024-10-09 21:42