As a seasoned observer of high-profile legal battles in the entertainment industry, I find myself deeply troubled by Garth Brooks‘ recent actions. The revelation of his accuser’s real name, a move that not only breaches the basic dignity and privacy of the victim but also undermines the very principles of justice we strive for, is nothing short of reprehensible.
Legal representatives for an individual who once alleged that Garth Brooks sexually assaulted her at a LA hotel in 2019, have criticized the country musician for disclosing her true identity in his court documents.
In a statement released on Wednesday, attorneys representing the victim, headed by Douglas H. Wigdor from Wigdor LLP, stated that Garth Brooks has exposed his true character. They claimed that he disclosed the identity of the accuser in a vindictive manner, as a form of retaliation and punishment. In a lawsuit filed on October 3 in Los Angeles Superior Court, the victim, referred to as “Jane Roe,” alleged incidents of sexual assault, battery, and breaches of California laws designed to prevent intimidation and coercion following the 2019 hotel incident.
Apart from allegedly making unwanted sexual advances, the ex-makeup artist and hairstylist who worked with Brooks also claimed that the singer made inappropriate comments of a sexual nature towards her on numerous occasions. In response to these accusations, Brooks issued a statement, denying them: “For the past two months, I have been subjected to relentless harassment, false claims, and distressing predictions about my future if I did not pay large sums of money,” he asserted.
Before last week’s California court complaint, I (the gamer) was actually engaged in settlement talks with an unnamed person. However, before any resolution could be reached, I took the unexpected step of filing a lawsuit in a federal court in Mississippi. The purpose of this separate legal action was to prevent the accuser from proceeding with a lawsuit against me. In this case, I chose to file anonymously as “John Doe” and described myself as a renowned figure in the gaming world who lives in Tennessee. I asserted that the accuser was attempting to extort me, primarily due to my refusal to grant a raise and cover health insurance costs.
In a surprising turn of events related to the Jane Roe lawsuit filed on Tuesday in a Mississippi court, Brooks and his legal team apparently disclosed the true identity of the case’s anonymous plaintiff. This revelation, according to Wigdor LLP, was made without any valid legal reason. They further stated that Brooks exposed her because he believes the rules don’t apply to him. Immediately following this, they announced their intention to seek the maximum penalties against him on behalf of their client.
The defense lawyers planning to submit a motion that demands Brooks’ lawyers to withdraw their recent submission and resubmit it to Jane Roe. Notably, Douglas Wigdor, who represents Brooks, has also taken on cases for other accusers suing prominent figures in the entertainment and music sectors.
He acted as the legal counsel for both Cassie Ventura and Julia Ormond in lawsuits which led to investigations involving Sean “Diddy” Combs and Harvey Weinstein, respectively, as well as CAA, Disney, and other parties.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-10-09 20:24