Gladiator II: Why We Desperately Need a Director’s Cut

by

Ever since the debut of Gladiator II a few months ago, I’ve found myself constantly pondering over the desire for a director’s cut. Finally, the long-awaited sequel from Ridley Scott is now accessible to watch at home and stream for Paramount+ subscribers. Although I enjoyed the movie (as expressed in my Gladiator II review), I can’t help but yearn for a more immersive rewatch experience through an extended version of the film.

In the theater, I watched the extended cut of “Gladiator II,” which lasted 2 hours and 28 minutes. For a blockbuster movie, this runtime is quite lengthy in my opinion. However, during my November viewing, I felt that certain story elements seemed missing, possibly trimmed to keep it under two and a half hours. Although Ridley Scott asserts this is the film he intended and his version, I’m intrigued by the prospect of a longer edition that appears less hurried and fragmented in comparison.

I’m Not Usually Into Director’s Cuts

While it’s true that there’s a vast market for extended versions of epic movies and director’s cuts, I must admit I don’t typically rush to watch these extended editions. Frankly, I find it intriguing when filmmakers can express more of their original vision when the initial cut was shortened by a studio. However, if a movie is stretching beyond three hours, I often wonder if it would be better suited as a miniseries instead.

On occasion, I may make mistakes in my judgments. For instance, I thoroughly enjoyed every moment of Martin Scorsese’s nearly three and a half hour film, “Killers Of The Flower Moon,” when I watched it in the cinema. Furthermore, I appreciate the return of intermissions, which was implemented in the Best Picture nominee, “The Brutalist.” However, director’s cuts are typically not my preference, but I would still like to see one for “Gladiator II.

But Immediately After Watching Gladiator II, I Wanted To See A Longer Version

Back in November, I eagerly watched “Gladiator II” at the cinema, having been excited about it since Ridley Scott’s original “Gladiator” was one of the standout films from the 2000s. Although it lived up to many expectations, especially with Denzel Washington’s captivating portrayal of a villain, I couldn’t help but feel that several plot points were insufficiently developed and overlooked. It seemed as though the movie moved quickly, even though its running time suggests otherwise. I suspect this might be due to the footage shot being more extensive than what could be included in the final version.

I found myself yearning for additional sequences that delved deeper into Macrinus’ past, thereby providing a richer insight into his character. A common critique seems to center around the underutilization of Connie Nielsen as Lucilla, particularly in her interactions with Pedro Pascal’s Acacius and Lucius. Her role felt somewhat marginalized in the film, but I believe she should have been one of its central figures. Moreover, certain scenes in the Colosseum seemed to pass by too quickly, leaving me yearning for more suspenseful and edge-of-your-seat moments.

There’s Been A Lot Of Chatter About What Was Removed For The Theatrical Cut

There’s been considerable discussion about additional scenes for the film “Gladiator II” that were ultimately trimmed, including a whole character that was deleted from the final version. Interestingly, May Calamawy, who impressed me in both “Ramy” and “Moon Knight,” was initially set to portray a significant character in “Gladiator II.” However, her role ended up being only a minor one. Although it’s not uncommon for actors to be removed from big productions like this, I believe Calamawy didn’t deserve such a limited presence in the movie.

Discussions have arisen regarding lost scenes from Gladiator II, such as the twin kings requesting adoption by Lucilla, which Washington suggested included a scene where Macrinus kissed another man, later removed from the film. Additionally, there appears to be deleted footage of Mescal and Pascal sharing a kiss. Beyond these romantic moments, it seems there might have been additional storylines in the movie. I’m curious about what a director’s cut of this film would entail.

Apart from Scott, there’s been discussion about the topic as well. In November, he revealed to The Hollywood Reporter that he’s considering releasing a 3-hour, 40-minute version, which I’m really eager to see. I believe an additional hour could potentially alter my perspective on the movie and provide the pace I felt it lacked initially.

At The End Of The Day, I Think I Just Wish I Liked Gladiator II Better

Currently, I’m really hoping for an extended cut of a Gladiator II, but to be candid, I think the original film could have been stronger. Numerous directors have created classics within a standard movie length of under three hours. My desire for a longer version is more due to my dissatisfaction with what was presented rather than a deep longing for more content.

It’s clear that it’s quite challenging for films to match up to some of Ridley Scott’s other masterpieces, such as Alien and Blade Runner. However, I strongly believe that with a little more focus on the script development, this movie could have been truly exceptional within its given runtime.

Regarding the sequel of “Gladiator,” while it’s natural to compare it with its predecessor, I find myself irritated when filmmakers stretch movies unnecessarily due to lack of restraint in trimming unnecessary scenes. It appears that Ridley Scott had a wealth of fascinating ideas for this installment, but they didn’t seamlessly blend together as one cohesive narrative. Perhaps an additional hour might have improved the flow, though I’m not certain. I’d undoubtedly be intrigued to see how it could have turned out.

Read More

2025-02-12 13:07