Is Twisters Better Than 1996’s Twister? What Critics Are Saying About the Sequel

Summary

  • Twisters
    currently registers at 80% on the Tomatometer based on 40 reviews.
  • Critics are torn when it comes to Glen Powell’s new film, but
    Twisters
    does have a much stronger Rotten Tomatoes score than that of its predecessor.
  • Twisters
    opens in theaters on July 19.

As a dedicated moviegoer with a soft spot for disaster films and a deep appreciation for the original “Twister” (1996), I’ve been eagerly anticipating the release of the long-awaited sequel, “Twisters,” starring the charismatic Glen Powell. The excitement was palpable when early reviews began to trickle in, but as a seasoned film critic, I knew better than to get carried away by the hype.


I’m thrilled as a fan to share that Twisters, the new film, has received an impressive 80% score on Rotten Tomatoes, which is significantly better than the original 1996 movie, Twister. As a huge fan of Glen Powell’s acting and his character “Tornado Wrangler” Tyler Owens, I can’t wait to join him on this thrilling journey as we prepare for the release of Twisters in theaters on Friday. However, it’s important to note that despite the promising start, not everything is smooth sailing for Warner Bros.’ latest production.

The new movie’s criticism is a blend of positive and negative assessments. Currently, it has an 80% score on the Tomatometer from 40 reviews. One critic, William Bibbiani of The Wrap, shares his enthusiasm for the chaotic and spinning disaster flick. He expresses:

In today’s blockbuster scene, “Twisters” is exceptional and reminiscent of the original “Twister” from 1996. This is a well-executed legacy sequel that sets itself apart.

Jordan Hoffman of Entertainment Weekly concurs:

Just about as good as a summer movie gets.

In the summer of 1996, Bill Paxton and Helen Hunt starred in the movie “Twister” together with an illustrious cast. However, this film received mixed reviews from critics, earning a Tomatometer score of around 63%. Despite the less-than-stellar critical reception, “Twister” hasn’t escaped criticism altogether. According to Nicholas Barber writing for BBC.com:

After more than two decades since the premiere of Jan de Bont’s Twister, movie executives have chosen to revive this successful franchise without bringing anything new to the table.

Twisters Touches Down with Some Critics, Fizzles Out with Others

As a devoted movie enthusiast, I was initially intrigued by the hype surrounding Twisters when it first appeared online. However, the reactions from different film critics can be quite polarizing. Some praised director Lee Isaac Chung’s disaster movie led by Glen Powell and gave it high marks, while others were less impressed. For instance, Jeff Ewing from Collider appreciated the film and awarded it a respectable 8 out of 10. In his review, he shared his positive experience with the movie.

The movie begins with an explosive opening, presenting significant conflicts, captivating personalities, and thrilling scenes designed for large theaters, providing a fulfilling continuation from the first installment.

Robbie Collin from the Daily Telegraph in the UK highly recommended “Twisters” with a flawless 5-star review! According to him:

Maverick.

At the same film screening, Damon Wise from Deadline had a slightly less intense experience than The Telegraph’s writer when the “Twisters” touched down. According to Wise’s account:

I find it challenging to picture who Twisters is intended for, as its dialogue feels outdated and stilted, except when it sounds like Satnav instructions. The chaotic spinning air hardly seems like an appealing investment with its bad behavior.

Owen Gleiberman of Variety adds:

In Twister, the excitement and enjoyment are diminished by the harsh realities that come with the experience.

Critics have varying opinions on the value of “Powell’s tornado movie,” but estimates predict that “Twisters” will generate between $45 million and $50 million in domestic sales during its debut weekend. However, this number pales in comparison to the film’s production budget of approximately $200 million, not including marketing and advertising expenses.

Read More

2024-07-15 19:01