Jello Biafra Revives Punk Anthem to Slam ‘MAGA Nazis’

by

Iconoclast punk legend, Jello Biafra, has always had the potential to engage in the ongoing cultural conflicts throughout the past four-and-a-half decades.

For quite some time now, the concept of free speech has faced repeated challenges. However, instead of joining the fray himself, the former Dead Kennedys lead vocalist chose to let others defend this right in accordance with the First Amendment.

In the West, there was a strong demand for individuals who could influence pop culture, but free speech took significant hits during this time.

Consider:

  • The Twitter Files revealed rampant attempts to censor right-leaning voices
  • Social media giants kicked a president off its platforms, hid the Hunter Biden laptop story and punished those who questioned pandemic protocols (and were mostly proven right)
  • Aging rockers like Neil Young pressured Spotify to fire Joe Rogan for sharing alternative views on the pandemic (that were mostly proven right)
  • Cancel Culture ran roughshod over comedy and the greater Hollywood community
  • The Biden administration sought to curtail speech on Big Tech platforms like Facebook
  • Terms like “misinformation” and “disinformation” targeted speech in the public sphere
  • “Sensitivity readers” erased passages written by Ian Fleming, Roald Dahl and Agatha Christie

That’s a partial list.

In which region did Biafra, a figure known for advocating for his freedom of speech in the 1980s, reside? If there have been any recent developments in this matter, they do not seem to have made headlines.

The punk rocker seemed perfectly suited to address the subject.

In 1985, their album titled “Frankenchrist” from his group contained an explicit artwork by H.R. Giger, which was considered obscene in certain circles. This led to a legal dispute that eventually reached the courtroom.

In dispute is an artwork that contributed to the storyline of the album, criticizing society’s increasing reliance on machinery, as suggested by the artist’s legal team. However, some contend that due to its controversial character, it may not be suitable for younger audiences.

In a sense, Biafra experienced a triumph, yet it had detrimental consequences for his professional path. This contentious battle over free speech is the foundation for a new play set in Los Angeles, titled “Porn Rock: The Obscenity Trial of Jello Biafra.

Currently, he’s expressing his discontent towards President Donald Trump in a similar vein as punk rock bands such as Green Day. Jello Biafra, a member of the Dead Kennedys, altered the lyrics of one of their songs to criticize the 47th president.

He changed the lyrics of a song, replacing “Nazi Punks F* Off” with “Nazi Trumps F* Off,” during a performance at the Marquis Theater in Denver.

For the very first time, we’re witnessing the emergence of a genuine authoritarian regime dressed in the colors of our nation – red, white, and blue – with individuals exhibiting behaviors reminiscent of brownshirts across the country.

Biafra is free to criticize President Trump’s executive orders as much as he likes. Likewise, Trump’s ongoing disputes with the Associated Press regarding the Gulf of Mexico merit a thoughtful discussion.

1. The rocker’s conspicuous lack of response regarding the recent limitations on free speech leaves a blemish on his opinions, and his music-centered activism comes off as politically biased.

2. The silence from the rocker on current free speech violations casts a shadow over his commentary, and his musical advocacy seems to be influenced by politics.

3. The rocker’s quietness about recent free speech issues tarnishes his viewpoints, while his music-related activism appears to be politically driven.

Period.

Then again, maybe he no longer resembles the free speech warrior of yore.

In this video, you’ll see him expressing longing for The Fairness Doctrine, which was abolished. The elimination of it sparked a surge in diverse media voices, such as Fox News, emerging since then.

Here’s how Brittanica described the Doctrine’s critics:

The fairness doctrine faced critics throughout its existence, as some people saw the equal time provision as a violation of the free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment. In 1985, the Federal Communications Commission concluded that the doctrine was stifling free expression.

Read More

2025-03-11 07:03