Joe Rogan Exposes Team Kamala, Legacy Media

by

Joe Rogan knows a thing or two about Fake News.

In 2021, the well-known figure on Spotify fell ill with COVID-19, but various media sources published incorrect details regarding his medical care plan.

Scribes once mockingly called Ivermectin “paste for horses,” despite its previous recognition with a Nobel Prize for human use. CNN has been accused of manipulating footage featuring the former “Fear Factor” host, making him appear more jaundiced and unwell.

On “The Joe Rogan Experience,” Rogan directly challenged Dr. Sanjay Gupta from CNN over his promotion of the “horse paste” theory.

Currently, Rogan clarifies the unsuccessful effort by Kamala Harris to be a part of his podcast during her presidential campaign’s later stages. The comedian claims he possesses supporting evidence to validate this claim.

The original account originated from the book “Fight: Inside the Most Contentious Election for the White House,” penned by journalists Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes. Allen serves as a Senior National Politics Reporter at NBC News, while Parnes is a senior political correspondent for The Hill.

According to interviews with Harris campaign officials, it’s claimed that Rogan deliberately made it difficult for the Vice President to appear on his podcast. The book implies that his team may have deceived her campaign in some way.

The unspoken reason? Team Rogan wanted Trump to win.

Now, Rogan is fighting back. And he’s calling Harris’ representatives liars.

Initially, I aimed to publish both interviews simultaneously. That was my intention and I even suggested doing it late on the same day. However, when Trump appeared, I thought, “What if we conduct hers after she finishes in Houston, if she arrives here?” But no one ever agreed to do so. It’s crucial to mention this because they continue to claim that I lied.

According to Joe Rogan, Harris’ team imposed various constraints on any potential interview, stipulating that it should last approximately an hour, despite Rogan’s usual three-hour show format. Moreover, they required a court reporter and representatives from Harris’ staff to be present during the recording.

Moreover, certain confidants were concerned over the program’s hasty editing decisions. Collectively, these concerns ensured that the intended interview did not materialize.

Now, Rogan is disputing the account from “Fight.”

Rogan also mentioned, “By the way, we’ve got all the receipts.” He continued, “I’ve got a record of our conversations… It seems to me that someone is attempting to protect themselves because she never did what was alleged, and if she had, it might have been beneficial. If our relationship was strong and it boosted the ‘young male vote,’ things could have turned out differently.

The most embarrassing part?

In simpler terms, Rogan implies that the authors didn’t reach out to him for his perspective when writing their book. While this oversight might be excused in a reporter working under deadline pressure as time is crucial and quick dissemination of important news to the public might mean not every detail can be double-checked.

The authors apparently had ample time provided by their book project, but as per Rogan’s account, they did not seek his perspective. However, it is unclear if they made an effort to contact him beforehand.

We’ll see.

According to Rogan, the authors claimed to have spoken to around 150 individuals regarding the events surrounding her appearance on the show. Interestingly, they did not speak with him, which is quite unusual. Remarkably, they didn’t even inquire about it, but they stated facts that were simply untrue.

The controversy surrounding the Rogan interview was another factor contributing to Harris’ loss against Trump on November 5. Despite her team’s efforts, they were unable to secure the critical interview that could potentially shift the course of the election campaign.

Read More

2025-02-05 03:03