Live From the Other Side With Tyler Henry Is Netflix’s Worst Live Show Yet

by

As a lifelong movie buff and skeptic of all things paranormal, I’ve seen my fair share of ghost hunters, psychics, and mediums. Netflix’s latest offering, “Live From the Other Side With Tyler Henry,” is just another disappointing addition to the list.

As Netflix ventures into hosting more live events, there’s been much anticipation: From watching a competitive hot dog eating contest to a hilarious comedy roast, it appears that this strategy has successfully drawn viewers for a shared viewing event. This interactive format seems crucial for Netflix’s future plans, as they aim to incorporate sports events in their offerings too. Consequently, the streaming world might be evolving into a blend of live and pre-recorded content.

Yet, one recent addition to the library is gaining traction, Live From the Other Side With Tyler Henry, which goes to show that Netflix may be looking more at maximizing profit than offering quality content. Employing a controversial practice and glamorizing it with stars from other Netflix shows, the recent live event is the worst offering yet from the streaming giant.

What Is Live From the Other Side With Tyler Henry?

On September 17, 2024, the first episode of the Netflix live event titled “Live From the Other Side With Tyler Henry” was released, perhaps overlooked by some. This event showcases popular psychic medium to Hollywood stars, Tyler Henry, who at 28 years old, alleges that he’s had the power to communicate with the deceased since he was 10. He has leveraged this ability to establish a notable career, including the E! show “Hollywood Medium with Tyler Henry“, the Netflix series “Life After Death with Tyler Henry“, and numerous live events. Additionally, he has penned two books.

In the latest Netflix live show, Henry conducts an intimate conversation with fellow Netflix personalities, reaching out to deceased loved ones as a way to find peace. The debut episode included Chrishell Stause from ‘Selling Sunset’, her sister Shonda Davisson, friends such as celebrity hairstylist Chris Appleton and television host Nina Parke. Within the 43-minute discussion, Henry managed to connect with Stause’s late mother, while Parke connected with a cousin who had passed away earlier in the year. The upcoming episodes will maintain this format.

Cold Reading Has Been Debunked Time and Time Again

It’s undeniable that Tyler Henry is charismatic and has built a thriving business based on his personality and talent for communication. However, it’s important to note that his methodologies have been repeatedly challenged. The primary approach, often referred to as cold reading, relies on making generalized statements to extract information from individuals. This technique involves using broad terms and then reacting to participants’ responses. For instance, one might begin with a vague notion like “a family has faced tough times recently” and gradually move towards more specific conclusions.

Henry doesn’t stand alone in adopting this method, as he typically initiates with extensive, wide-ranging ideas that lead him to his final conclusions. This technique has garnered criticism from many because it tends to be more effective on those seeking answers, and it flourishes when it encounters vulnerability for maximum precision. Some have even gone so far as to call him a ‘grief vampire.’ Although it may seem like he’s assisting people in the short term, there are also stories of individuals feeling worse after their readings. Rebecca Watson, part of the ‘debunker community,’ addressed this issue in a lengthy article for Future Tense. Her personal experiences with another psychic medium, the subsequent relief followed by anger at being deceived, had a negative impact on her mental health and prompted her to become an advocate against such practices.

Tyler Henry has faced allegations that he employs more targeted deceptions in his methodology. Given his celebrity clientele, there’s an abundance of easily accessible information to gather from social media and news articles. In a comprehensive analysis on Nicki Swift, it’s suggested that it seems highly probable that Henry researched his subjects before their meetings. This is indeed a concern in today’s digital age, as many people may not realize the extent to which their lives can be reconstructed based on online activities.

Netflix’s Unfortunate Choice to Include Questionable Content

It’s worth mentioning that Netflix has previously provided a space for debatable content, such as their series “The Goop Lab” which has faced similar criticisms about its suitability for the platform. While some aspects of “The Goop Lab” were controversial, Gwyneth Paltrow’s company has also been under fire for marketing unproven vaginal health products and potentially hazardous treatments like Bee Venom Therapy. This is significant because Tyler Henry isn’t the only questionable Netflix original that has presented contentious material.

As a movie buff who appreciates the supernatural, I must admit there’s a bit of skepticism when it comes to Tyler Henry. You see, he operates within the grief counseling sphere using an unverified method that feels rather questionable. The fact that he works with celebrities makes this practice seem more acceptable and even glamorous to those grieving and in search of answers. This trend could be setting a dangerous precedent for the acceptance of alternative therapies, some of which might do more harm than good.

It’s crucial to understand that being open-minded isn’t the same as having an empty or weak mind, but rather, it means being receptive to new ideas without prejudice.

It’s advisable to thoroughly investigate and maintain a healthy dose of skepticism towards individuals who provide solutions without solid evidence backing their methods. Many discerning viewers might perceive programs such as “Live From the Other Side with Tyler Henry” as questionable or potentially misleading.

Read More

2024-09-22 04:01