Mirroring The Industry: Bhool Chuk Maaf standoff between Dinesh Vijan and PVRInox could reshape the future of Hindi Cinema — And not for the better

by

The legal fight between Maddock Films and PVR Inox concerning the release of Bhool Chuk Maaf in the Mumbai High Court has stirred up the Indian film industry. What initially seemed like a disagreement over terms of release, has evolved into a case that might significantly influence the future of cinema screenings post-pandemic. If the outcome favors one side, it could bring about severe repercussions for exhibitors, producers, and the entire Hindi film industry’s supply chain in the coming years.

The main source of contention revolves around the change in the usual eight-week release schedule for the movie “Bhool Chuk Maaf” starring actors Rajkummar Rao and Wamiqa Gabbi. This shift undermines the longstanding cinema industry practice that protects Hindi film exhibitors from the competition posed by viewers consuming content at home on digital platforms. In this instance, the proposed conditions by PVRInox, such as a reduced window of just two weeks, forgiveness for virtual print fees (VPF), and a payout of 47.50 percent in the first week instead of the standard 50 percent, have not only sparked outrage among exhibitors but also unveiled underlying tensions between cinema halls and content creators. These power struggles can ultimately lead to a breakdown in the system.

The OTT Domination

Amazon Prime Video, one of the producers of Bhool Chuk Maaf, prefers a shorter theatrical release period for future films to quickly bring them onto streaming platforms, rather than the usual eight-week wait. If this approach proves effective, it could establish a potentially harmful precedent: streaming services might start compelling producers to bypass or reduce the theatrical release window entirely, using Bhool Chuk Maaf as an example. The exhibitors, who are also distributors, have found themselves in this predicament due to a dispute with the team of Bhool Chuk Maaf. A direct-to-digital release would have been more beneficial for the national chain than a theatrical release with a two-week digital window.

This action could potentially destroy the environment that Maddock Films has profited from – the same eight-week window during which their less-celebrity focused films such as Stree, Bala, Zara Hatke Zara Bachke, Munjya, Stree 2, & Chhaava were able to sustain a theatrical run before being released on digital platforms. This isn’t just ironic; it’s a self-inflicted undermining of their own success.

PVR Inox and Investor Confidence

As a lifestyle expert, I’d put it this way: For me, as someone deeply invested in the cinema industry, particularly with PVR Inox, India’s leading cinema chain, the stakes are significantly high. Our revenue and investor trust hinge heavily on a robust exhibition model. If film producers start reducing the theatrical exclusivity window, it could diminish the sense of urgency for audiences to catch a movie in cinemas. When compared to a monthly subscription service costing just Rs 149 more than a single Rs 150 movie ticket, offering instant access to the same content within days, the allure of cinema might fade away.

Slacking demand for large-screen content viewing might set off a chain reaction: decreasing audience attendance, plummeting stock prices, dwindling revenues for theater chains, and eventually, the demise of a theatrical premiere-centric culture that has been a hallmark of Hindi cinema for many years.

The Star System Collapse

One often overlooked yet significant danger lies in the potential failure of the star system prevalent within the Hindi Film Industry. Traditionally, the success of movies has been heavily reliant on star power, with ticket sales serving as a form of audience approval. However, in the era of streaming services, this dynamic shifts significantly. Viewers can now watch films at their convenience, and any individual could potentially headline a digital release, regardless of their box office appeal. For viewers, accessing content becomes as simple as a single click.

On OTT platforms, instead of selling tickets, they usually sell access. Removing the screening process gives less weight to a celebrity’s status, and decreases the motivation to create new stars. The idea of equal opportunities in casting may seem idealistic, but it actually disrupts a system that has been crucial to the Indian film industry for many years.

The Streaming Monopoly

Additionally, there’s a potential future where streamers may hold significant power over producers, potentially reducing them to just content providers following corporate directives. In this scenario, creative risks might be sidelined, and the dream of box office success could fade away. Instead, Indian storytelling would be shaped more for digital engagement and global streaming rather than traditional silver screen experiences. The rich tapestry of big-screen Hindi cinema, encompassing both large-scale entertainers and medium-budget genre films, might be overshadowed by a few dominant tech companies, who have publicly expressed their plans to phase out cinemas within the next decade.

A Call for Industry Unity

This matter extends beyond Bhool Chuk Maaf alone. It serves as a trial for the Hindi film industry to unite and safeguard its future interests once this issue is resolved. Everyone involved, including producers, theater owners, and streaming platforms, should bear in mind that immediate profits should not compromise long-term viability.

A pre-trial agreement that focuses on quick digital income rather than upholding cinematic tradition in theaters might look appealing to many, but it could potentially endanger the essence of Indian cinema – the grandeur of the big screen. Interestingly, it’s the major player in the theater industry who has put the exhibition community at risk by engaging in a dispute that was essentially a power struggle disguised as a fight.

Read More

2025-05-15 15:52