Quick Links
- Why Was Sazz Murdered, and Is It Someone Charles Knows?
- Is the Only Murders in the Building Killer From Hollywood?
- Only Murders in the Building Has Set the Stage for a Great Season
As a long-time fan of the witty and captivating world of “Only Murders in the Building,” I must say that the fourth season seems to be setting the stage for an absolute rollercoaster ride of suspense, humor, and Hollywood intrigue. With its knack for keeping us guessing and the ability to make us laugh until our sides ache, this show has consistently proven itself as a masterclass in storytelling.
The Arconia trio is once again reunited and heading off to Hollywood. Following their satirical take on Broadway musicals last year, the critically acclaimed comedy-mystery series Only Murders in the Building takes its meta element a step further in season 4. The action begins when a prominent film studio extends an offer to the trio, planning to transform their popular podcast into a movie. The season opener has already delivered several hilarious moments and unexpected celebrity appearances from Eugene Levy, Zach Galifianakis, and Eva Longoria, who will portray Charles, Oliver, and Mabel in the film.
Stepping into the realm of film criticism, let me share my thoughts on the latest episode of “Only Murders.” Much like its signature style, an unforeseen murder has sent shockwaves through the narrative. In the thrilling climax of season three, it was none other than Charles’ long-term stunt double, Sazz Pataki, who met a tragic end – gunned down by an unidentified sniper. This week, our investigative trio stumbled upon Sazz’s cremated remains hidden within the hotel’s incinerator. Upon closer examination, they were able to recognize her from her artificial bones. As texts under Sazz’s name started pouring in, Charles demanded to know the sender’s identity – only receiving a chilling response: “Not your so-called friend.”
Read Our Review
Why Was Sazz Murdered, and Is It Someone Charles Knows?
When contemplating potential culprits so far, it’s crucial to start by understanding what could motivate someone to kill Sazz. Since there were frequent mix-ups between her and Charles, it appears possible that Charles was the intended victim instead. The final episodes of Season 3, which depict Sazz urgently trying to meet with Charles privately, seem to support this idea as she may have been trying to warn him. However, if Sazz was merely a decoy, it’s still probable that the killer harbors a grudge against Charles and aims to make the situation personal.
It seems that Jan Bellows, the killer from the first season who is currently serving time, could very well be our prime suspect at this point. Her romantic interludes with Charles during the show’s initial run were undeniably amusing, but they took a dark turn when her homicidal tendencies surfaced, creating one of the most memorable plot twists in the series. In the second season, it became evident that she continued to harbor feelings for him despite being behind bars.
In the end, Charles opted to end their relationship, yet it appears his choice to have Sazz deliver the news was not wise in retrospect. What makes this situation particularly intriguing is that Season 3 unveiled that Sazz had formed a bond with Jan, which could suggest he intentionally drew her into a trap as a form of revenge against Charles. Interestingly, while Amy Ryan isn’t among the confirmed cast members for this season, it wouldn’t be shocking if she made an appearance in some capacity.
Although she appears to be an overt suspect, it’s intriguing that she could still be the culprit, given the potential for an unexpected plot twist by introducing a recurring murderer. The Season 3 finale may offer another clue, as one of its final scenes depicts Charles’ ex, Joy, receiving a text from Scott Bakula, whom she claims greets her. It seems unlikely that his appearance in this week’s premiere is merely coincidental or a hint at the revelation that Sazz also worked as a stunt double for him. Given the creator John Hoffman’s discussions about Season 4 revolving around doppelgängers, it could be a clever twist if the killer turns out to be another television actor. Recall the confusion between Charles and Scott in the pilot? Perhaps that was a subtle hint.
Is the Only Murders in the Building Killer From Hollywood?
Given that the fourth season of “Only Murders” is heavily centered around the Hollywood subplot, it would make the storyline more consistent if the murderer were connected to these new characters. With an even greater lineup of celebrity guests this year, it might feel underwhelming if the killer didn’t turn out to be one of the famous faces in the cast. While it could be amusing for Galifianakis, Levy, or Longoria to be the culprit, their characters haven’t provided any clues so far that would make us suspect them.
It’s highly probable that the main character in one of the subplots, Bev Melon, played by Molly Shannon, will play a significant role this season. She is actively working to get the movie produced and released before year-end, showing clear frustration with Mabel’s hesitance about granting her life rights. It wouldn’t be surprising if Bev secretly orchestrated the demise of one of the trio’s friends, planning to use this as leverage to force them into agreeing to the project.
Bev might have ulterior, darker intentions, similar to screenwriter Marshall Pope, the “Brothers” director duo, or any studio executives, as they manipulate real-life tragedy for artistic purposes. This upcoming season of “Only Murders” seems to be shaping up as its most confoundingly self-referential yet. What could be more self-reflective than a murderer prolonging their rampage merely to keep the storyline alive? Moreover, “Only Murders in the Building” has always been a spot-on parody of true-crime fanatics since its debut, and this development could push that theme to its extreme limits.
Surely, there’s a chance this plot twist may seem reminiscent of Season 2’s reveal that Becky Butler, Cinda Canning’s assistant, was behind the murder that year, attempting to implicate her boss and our trio. Yet, given the apparent focus on satirizing Hollywood and its ruthless dynamics in this season, it wouldn’t be entirely unexpected either.
Only Murders in the Building Has Set the Stage for a Great Season
To be clear, all of this is merely conjecture for now. But if past seasons have shown us anything, it’s that the real villain isn’t always who we initially suspect – a lesson the show has repeatedly taught us through its clever use of red herrings. In any event, with the stage set for an exhilarating fourth season, I can’t help but feel excited about what’s to come. If this week’s premiere is any sign, Only Murders in the Building continues to keep us guessing while tickling our funny bones. So here’s to seeing where things go next! Oh, and by the way, don’t forget to tune in on Hulu every Tuesday for new episodes of Only Murders in the Building Season 4.
Read More
Sorry. No data so far.
2024-08-31 00:31